Prev Close | 45.42 |
Day Low/High | 45.14 / 47.22 |
52 Wk Low/High | 35.71 / 48.22 |
Prev Close | 45.42 |
Day Low/High | 45.14 / 47.22 |
52 Wk Low/High | 35.71 / 48.22 |
Exchange | NASDAQ |
Shares Outstanding | 97.68B |
Market Cap | 4.44B |
P/E Ratio | N/A |
Div & Yield | N.A. (N.A) |
Three months into its existence, the 2022 Double Net Value Portfolio is in sync with the Russell 2000.
The 2022 Double Net Value Portfolio is a diverse bunch and includes a few carryovers from the 2021 version.
The 2021 Double Net Value Portfolio started strong but ran out of gas in the second half of the year as small-cap stocks in general faded.
The charts of the supplier of electronic components indicate higher prices for its shares are on the horizon.
While the big guns meet at the White House about the global chip shortage, the president and these companies are approaching this all wrong.
The shares have been weakening since late May.
I build a Double Net Value portfolio every year that's comprised of companies that have three attributes.
Fifteen of the 18 names in my 2021 Double Net Value Portfolio are in positive territory.
This tracking portfolio is comprised of companies that have three specific attributes.
Perhaps for the first time since I've been doing this annual experiment, all names are in positive territory.
The 2021 Double Net Value Portfolio has had a great first two months as small-cap stocks in general have been hot.
The aggregate return of the 2021 Double Net Value Portfolio one month since inception is outpacing a handful of Russell indices.
Eighteen stocks make the cut for the 2021 portfolio, which is comprised of seemingly cheap names relative to net current assets.
As a sometimes 'dumpster-diver', I'll look for situations where names appear to have been beaten up well beyond what they deserve.
The 22 stocks in the Double Net Value Portfolio collectively outperformed the value components of the Russell 2000 and Russell Micro indices.
Most of the 22 largely small-cap stocks that make up the portfolio are now in positive territory, with Hibbett Sports leading the way.
The portfolio of 22 smaller names has slid into negative territory, showing the pressure the market has put of late on smaller-cap stocks.
As we enter the dog days of summer, with lower volume and perhaps more volatility, portfolio performance may get interesting.
This is the first inception-to-date period that the portfolio has not outperformed its benchmarks.
These 22 stocks in the aggregate are still outpacing the Russell 2000 and Russell Microcap indices, but by a narrower margin than before.
These 22 stocks in the aggregate continue to outpace the Russell 2000 and Russell Microcap indices as all but three are in positive territory.
Titan Machinery is the top performer so far in 2019, up 38% since portfolio launch.
The 22 names in the portfolio as a group are outpacing the value components of the Russell 2000 and Russell Microcap indices.
Despite disappointing performance this year, the strategy has shown solid return in the past.
It was not a great year for this value portfolio, with only 5 stocks in positive territory for the year.
This mix of 20 deep-value names was outperforming a couple Russell indices three months back but is trailing them now.
This portfolio of 10 eclectic names has pushed higher since the start of 2018 and is up 40.5% since inception just 14 months ago.
Fossil Group has done most of the heavy lifting among the small stocks in the portfolio, though there are other winners, too.
FOSL is up 92% since I launched this group, while HIBB is ahead 27%.