• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • TheStreet Smarts
  1. Home
  2. / Markets

Less Hawkish Hike? Fed Language Changes, Powell's Word Salad, PacWest Watch

What could be forcing futures traders to price in such an aggressive pace of policy easing despite absolutely no signaling in that direction? Simple.
By STEPHEN GUILFOYLE
May 04, 2023 | 07:20 AM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: BUD, BDX, DDOG, K, MLM, MRNA, W, ZTS, AAPL, TEAM, SQ, COIN, SHOP, PACW, JPM, XLE, XLF, XLB

Less hawkish hike?
 
That's how it sounded to me.
 
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) increased the central bank's target range by 25 basis points on Wednesday, to a range spanning from 5% to 5.25%. This, the tenth consecutive Fed policy meeting that culminated with a rate hike, brings that target up to the 5.1% Fed Funds rate that the FOMC, at the median, had predicted for year's end in their economic projections just this past March.
 
Taking a look at the official statement, the FOMC led off by replacing "Job gains have picked up" and are "running at a robust pace" with simply "Job gains have been robust." This was meant to get straight to the point of justifying this most recent rate increase. At that point, the statement gets more cautious.
 
The U.S. banking system is mentioned next. After telling us once again that this system is "sound and resilient" the messaging changed. The Fed tells us that "recent developments are likely to result in tighter credit conditions for households and businesses and to weigh on economic activity." The next sentence reminds us that the Fed "remains highly attentive to inflation risks." This keeps the look forward as flexible as possible.
 
Then it happened. A slightly less hawkish change in messaging. After announcing the 25 basis point hike, "The Committee anticipates that some additional policy firming may be appropriate" became "In determining the extent to which additional policy firming may be appropriate" as the lead in to the fact that the Fed is considering the "cumulative tightening of monetary policy" to include the much talked about lag effect as well as developing economic data.
 
Does that sound like a dovish hike to you? Not exactly, in my opinion, but it certainly is less hawkish. Not a pivot toward more accommodative policy, but certainly a setup for the pause we have been looking for should the FOMC go that way next month (June 14).

The Fed Chair

At the press conference that followed the statement, Fed Chair Jerome Powell referred to the change in language in that statement as "meaningful," while bringing up the "tighter credit conditions for households and businesses" mentioned in the statement. Powell went on to discuss the turmoil currently being felt across the regional banking space and even said "In principle, we won't have to raise rates as high as we would have had this not happened."
 
Still, though, Powell tried to be elusive, and probably succeeded in that. When asked if monetary policy was now restrictive enough, he answered, "That's going to be an ongoing assessment. We're going to need data to accumulate on that. Not an assessment that we've made -- that would mean we've reached that point. And I just think it's not possible to say that with confidence now."
 
Word salad. Said absolutely nothing.

Fed Funds Futures

As the wee hours pass, I see that Fed Funds Futures trading in Chicago are now pricing in a 99% probability for no rate hike on June 14. These markets are also pricing in a 55% likelihood for no change at the following meeting, on July 26. That's where the fun stops, or starts, depending upon one's perspective.
 
Futures markets are now adjusting for a first rate cut on September 20 (82% probability) and at least seven consecutive meetings culminating with rate cuts following that one. This market currently sees a Fed Funds rate of 4.25% to 4.5% by year's end, and a Fed Funds rate at least as low as 2.75% to 3% 12 months after that.
 
What could be forcing futures traders to price in such an aggressive pace of policy easing despite absolutely no signaling in that direction whatsoever by anyone at the Fed? Simple. The expectation for an outright recession, and perhaps not such a mild one at that.

On That Note...

Perhaps readers followed financial markets on Wednesday afternoon. Remember Wednesday's child? Full of woe? Well, markets fell out of bed late in the regular session on Wednesday. At least the stock market did. Treasury yields continue to fall as traders head toward perceived safety. Debt ceiling negotiations be darned.
 
By day's end, the U.S. 10-Year Note had paid just 3.34% at its highs, while the U.S. Two-Year Note paid just 3.81%. With the Fed pretty much stapling short-term rates in place, the U.S. Three-Month T-Bill continued to yield roughly 5.2% (give or take a couple of basis points).
 
The spread between what Three-Month and 10-Year paper yield reached yet another multi-decade record for negativity on Wednesday.
 
 
As often mentioned in this column, this spread is the most accurate predictor for economic recession at our (or the Fed's) disposal. -188 basis points is much worse than awful.
 
Maybe you caught Double Line Capital's Jeffrey Gundlach on CNBC Wednesday. Gundlach is not always right, but he is always smart and well thought out. Gundlach simply said, "Recessionary odds are pretty darn high right now." and added when talking about equities... "My suspicion is we'll break to the downside."

Equities

The Fed was not the only game in town on Wednesday. JPMorgan ( JPM) head of technical strategy, Jason Hunter wrote, "We continue to expect a sell off from that area (S&P 500 4100-4200 range) to retest medium-term support at the 3764 Dec low and 3760 Oct 61.8% (Fibonacci) retrace this spring, and look for an eventual extension back to key levels near 3500 by early summer."
 
Hunter added, "We believe that we'll ultimately set a cycle bottom, especially if that weak performance is accompanied by impulsive yield curve steepening. Until that setup emerges, we suggest maintaining a bearish bias and staying defensively positioned."
 
Wow. Tell us how you really feel. You know what would steepen the curve? Yes, higher longer-term yields, but also the Fed permitting the short-end of said curve to be priced according to supply and demand. Kind of what those Fed Funds Futures in Chicago are trying to tell us.
 
For the day, after having traded higher, most of your major equity indexes caved. By day's end, the S&P 500 had given up 0.7%, while the Nasdaq Composite had lost 0.46%.
 
The more specialized the index, the worse off it was. The KBW Bank Index surrendered 1.89% as the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index gave up 1.32%. The small-to mid-cap indexes all outperformed the broader equity market.
 
All 11 S&P sector SPDR ETFs shaded red for the session, with Energy ( XLE) , the Financials ( XLF) , and Materials ( XLB) , all at least 1% lower. Note that all of those sectors are cyclical in nature and cyclicals show weakness ahead of recession. Yes, that's why WTI Crude was taken out to the woodshed yet again.
 
The slope of the yield curve remains the driver behind banking weakness. That's at least understandable. However, weakness in Materials (and industrial commodities) as the U.S. dollar softens simultaneously? How ugly is this going to get?

Oh No!

PacWest Bancorp ( PACW) closed down 1.98% on Wednesday at $6.42. I currently see the shares trading with a $3 handle, down roughly 38% from that closing price.
 
Bloomberg News reported late Wednesday that the Beverly Hills-based bank (yes, another regional) is working with an advisor and considering either some kind of break-up or capital raise, though no formal sales process had yet begun.
 
PACW traded with a $28 handle as recently as this past March and as high as $51.81 back in February 2022.

At Least...

The ISM Non-Manufacturing Index for April was better than decent. Headline print of 51.9. New Orders at an impressive 56.1. Pricing at, oh, 59.6. That's not good.

Economics (All Times Eastern)

08:30 - Balance of Trade (Mar): Last $-70.5B.
 
08:30 - Initial Jobless Claims (Weekly): Expecting 240K, Last 230K.
 
08:30 - Continuing Claims (Weekly): Last 1.858M.
 
08:30 - Unit Labor Costs (Q1-adv): Expecting 4.7% q/q, Last 3.2% q/q.
 
08:30 - Non-Farm Productivity (Q1-adv):  Expecting -1.5% q/q, Last 1.7% q/q.
 
10:30 - Natural Gas Inventories (Weekly): Last +79B cf.

The Fed (All Times Eastern)

No public appearances scheduled.

Today's Earnings Highlights (Consensus EPS Expectations)

Before the Open: ( BUD) (0.60), ( BDX) (2.75), ( DDOG) (0.24), ( K) (0.99), ( MLM) (1.02), ( MRNA) (-1.74), ( W) (-1.71), ( ZTS) (1.26)
 
After the Close: ( AAPL) (1.43), ( TEAM) (0.35), ( SQ) (0.34), ( COIN) (-0.87), ( SHOP) (-0.04)
 
(Apple is a holding in the Action Alerts PLUS member club . Want to be alerted before AAP buys or sells this stock? Learn more now. )
 
Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Guilfoyle was long AAPL equity.

TAGS: Federal Reserve | Futures | Interest Rates | Markets | Rates and Bonds | Stocks | Trading | Treasury Bonds

More from Markets

FS Insight Weekly Roadmap: Q4 Shows Promise After 'Vortex of Pain'

Tom Lee and the FSI Team
Sep 30, 2023 9:06 AM EDT

Despite a high volume of noise, inflation remains the primary macro driver for markets, while a government shutdown could put the Fed on an automatic 'structural pause.'

Dip Buyers Should Check Out These 3 Stocks

Ed Ponsi
Sep 29, 2023 12:30 PM EDT

Let's go to the charts to create game plans for three names that have fallen into oversold territory.

Is Zscaler Giving Off a Buy Signal?

Bruce Kamich
Sep 29, 2023 11:44 AM EDT

Here's when investors may want to add.

Is There Enough Fuel in the Tank to Extend the Market Bounce?

Guy Ortmann
Sep 29, 2023 10:22 AM EDT

Index trends remain bearish.

What a Government Shutdown Could Mean for the Stock Market

Tom Lee and the FSI Team
Sep 29, 2023 8:33 AM EDT

In some ways, a government shutdown might actually automatically put the Fed on a 'structural pause.'

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 12:13 PM EDT BRUCE KAMICH

    8 Trading Rules from T. T. Hoyne

    You just read the header for this missive and prob...
  • 08:42 AM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    How Elite Traders Make Big Profits
  • 02:58 PM EDT BRUCE KAMICH

    Classic Trading Rules From Bernard Baruch

    Bernard Baruch listed the rules (below) in his aut...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2023 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login