• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Jim Cramer

Jim Cramer: We Can't Have It All

You can't have the banks and financial tech stocks go up, old and new tech rally simultaneously and the soft goods companies and industrial techs rise -- someone's wrong.
By JIM CRAMER Sep 12, 2019 | 03:44 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: MA, V, AXP, AAPL, SBUX, BAC, JPM, PYPL, CRM

Can everything be right? Can there be a moment when you can't even see what can go wrong?

We are in one of those moments when I believe that the buyers are too complacent and that you can't possibly have it all the ways you would like.

Hope can spring eternal, but Thursday, I think we saw too much hope spring eternal, and I think it can't be reconciled. You can't have the banks go up and the financial tech stocks go up. It is either one or other. You can't have both old and new tech rally. They tend to trade in opposite directions. And you most definitely do not have the soft goods companies go up, when many of the more industrial techs rally.

What's going on here? Where did the rotations go? Why is it that only the industrials are able to buck the upward trend --and that's because several of them gave some downbeat analyst presentations?

I think it's pretty simple: Someone's wrong. Everyone's presuming that things are good everywhere, and it's not going to pan out that way.

Let me explain.

For a very long time now this market has been hemorrhaging money. We have seen individuals leave the asset class for bonds seemingly at any level. I think stocks have become, in many ways, a discredited asset class despite their favorable tax status.

The marginal buyers tend to be pension funds, individuals buying index funds for retirement and the companies themselves. Who can blame them? Stocks are trading erratically. They are being revaluated on any bit of news. There is no consistency whatsoever, and we have now advanced for seven straight days, a rather long skein, and one that usually means buyers will soon be exhausted, more on that later.

The lack of money in has often meant that we have whippy rotations, where money leaves one sector for another or flits around from, say, the big banks to companies like Mastercard (MA) , Visa (V) , and American Express  (AXP) , depending upon whether interest rates are going up or down.

Not now. They are all rallying.

What's the cause? While I would love to believe that there is a new wave of money at last coming into the market, the statistics say otherwise. In fact, we are experiencing one of the largest migrations from stocks to bonds we have seen in ages.

No, I think that some of these buy factions will prove to be just plain wrong, and it could cause pain when the smoke from the battle clears and we see the winning side.

First, let's talk trade. Right now, buyers are under the impression that we may be having a thaw in our trade war with China, because President Donald Trump extended a goodwill gesture by pushing back the next bump -- 5% -- two weeks so as not to coincide with the founding of the People's Republic.

In return, the Chinese Wednesday night said that they would be willing to make an interim deal on trade, if we would be willing to separate purchases of goods with the other issues we think the Chinese should change, the ones related to intellectual property, bogus joint ventures and coercion against those that do business in China.

All that sounds rather rosy. Except that's a total misread of the situation. When the president first began to upend our decades-long trade practices of letting the Chinese pretty much have their way with us in return for hopes that they would become more democratic and more open, he was focused on our trading imbalance. Had the Chinese stepped up and bought a lot more goods from us, the tiff might not have escalated into a trade war.

But they didn't. And now the president is digging in his heels, insisting that the Chinese address all sorts of inequities, especially because the idea that the People's Republic has gotten more open and more democratic is just plain fanciful.

That's why the Chinese response to the president's two-week reprieve is so tone deaf. We're way too late in the game for him to be appeased by a soybean buy. The president's confident of winning the farm states anyway.

So those who think we are closer to a trade deal and are buying lots of companies that do well when we have great relations with China -- including semis, Apple (AAPL) and Starbucks  (SBUX) -- are being too rosy. I foresee disappointment.

How about the banks and the fintechs? Those who are buying the likes of Bank of America (BAC) and JP Morgan (JPM) are betting that the economy is going to get better, taking rates up with it. Those buying Visa, Mastercard and Paypal (PYPL) are wagering that the economy will slow, rates will come down and you will want to own companies that do just as well when things are fast as slow, because of the secular trends of paper to plastic and plastic to digital.

Someone's wrong.

I think that buyers of the banks could be off-base, because I don't see a much stronger economy occurring. Here's why. To get that to happen, we need the Fed to cut rates and cut them soon. That will re-accelerate the economy for certain. I fear, though, that Jay Powell, will want to be measured and say that he needs to see a further slowing before he cuts when they meet next week. Of course, he might really not want to cut rates, because he doesn't like being called a bonehead, the president's precise term for raising rates too far too fast and then taking them down at a much slower pace, disadvantaging us vs. the rest of the world, especially the European Union, which has a bias toward less than a less-than-zero monetary policy.

I think the president's dead right about cutting rates to keep the economy hunting, and I see nothing wrong with trying to take unemployment even lower by bringing in the formerly thought of as unemployables. But the Fed can't cut and not cut at the same time. Count me as a buyer of the Mastercards and the Visas.

Then there's the retailers vs. the consumer-products companies. We buy the former when the economy is humming. We buy the latter when the economy is sluggish. I think the retail stocks have had too much of a good thing and can be trimmed. And I think that the consumer-packaged goods stocks are too expensive vs. their historical levels.

Finally, there's old tech vs. new tech. Old tech is typically about supporting personal computers and cellphones. New tech is about the cloud. I believe the former is rallying because of a trade deal that I don't believe is happening this soon. The latter's taking off, because the sellers are exhausted and yet the numbers for the cloud companies, like those recently reported by Salesforce.com (CRM) are stellar. I trust the cloud, and I am suspicious of cellphone sales. Remember, I think this remarkable rally in Apple is all about the watch and the service stream growing to the point where the company can smooth out revenues and ultimately raise margins and earnings per share.

In the end, it is possible that both sides could be right, one after another. But both at the same time? It's been known to occur periodically, but not last for long.

(AAPL, JPM, CRM and CRM are holdings in Jim Cramer's Action Alerts PLUS member club. Want to be alerted before Jim Cramer buys or sells these stocks? Learn more now.)

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.
TAGS: Stocks | Jim Cramer |

More from Jim Cramer

Jim Cramer: I'll Put My Money With 'Boring but Lucrative' Any Day

Jim Cramer
Sep 29, 2021 1:28 PM EDT

Let's look at that recent downgrade of 'dull' Morgan Stanley and see why exciting is best left for the stadiums and amusement parks -- and not stocks.

Jim Cramer: America's Toughest Job? Finding Workers

Jim Cramer
Sep 28, 2021 12:17 PM EDT

It's the question of our time: Where are the people willing to take on these better paying gigs? Let's see what's going on and what we need to happen.

Jim Cramer: Here's How Analysts Can Be Off By a Wide Margin

Jim Cramer
Sep 24, 2021 12:02 PM EDT

Let's look at the reactions to Nike, Costco and Salesforce to see what happens when they're viewed from a real world perspective.

Jim Cramer: It's Pure Insanity That We Don't Make Chips Here in the U.S.

Jim Cramer
Sep 23, 2021 11:05 AM EDT

While the big guns meet at the White House about the global chip shortage, the president and these companies are approaching this all wrong.

Jim Cramer: Go Ahead, Have a Cow, but I Say Powell and Xi Are Bulls

Jim Cramer
Sep 22, 2021 3:51 PM EDT

We rallied, because China's President Xi and Fed Chair Powell made decisions that they knew would lead to rallies.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 02:46 PM EDT STEPHEN GUILFOYLE

    We're Shedding Some of This Holding on Strength

    Check out the Stocks Under $10 portfolio here!
  • 11:33 AM EDT PETER TCHIR

    Thoughts Ahead of the Fed Minutes

    Recent economic and earnings issues are convincing...
  • 02:24 PM EDT PAUL PRICE

    An Interesting Chart

    I'm betting heavily that stocks will be way up aga...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2022 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login