• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • TheStreet Smarts
  1. Home
  2. / Jim Cramer

Jim Cramer: Not Only Did Apple Win But Epic Games Lost Big

How come this decision was so opaque to so many?
By JIM CRAMER Sep 13, 2021 | 01:00 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: AAPL, MMM, JNJ

Wall Street's terrific at evaluating so many elements of a company that it's pretty much a darned good arbiter when the collective judgments made about a business.

Except, that is, when it comes to lawsuits.

Last Friday a decision was handed down by a federal judge in a dispute between Apple (AAPL) and Epic Games, the maker of Fortnite, that was widely hailed as a huge victory for the gaming company. The decision sent Apple's stock in a tailspin, sending it from $154 to $149, something that when you consider Apple has 16 billion shares outstanding is a darned big deal.

There's only one problem: Epic didn't win. It lost. In fact it lost big but because a bunch of analysts made cursory judgments about the judge granting an injunction against Apple using an obscure provision of a California antitrust law, a law that has a very low bar, we heard that it could be the end of the App Store's incredibly profitable gaming revenue. Had they bothered to read the whole opinion and consult with counsel they would have realized that Apple came out way ahead, hence why Epic, not Apple, appealed. Epic was arguing that Apple exerts monopoly power to exact exorbitant fees from developers, fess that discourage innovation that's specially outlawed by the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Had Apple lost on that issue the decline in the stock would have been deserving. It wasn't.

Now the judge did rule that Apple demonstrated incipient antitrust behavior on the very narrow notion of steering companies to the App store but the judge had to admit that Apple's just giving the customer - the actual user of the phone - what's best for them both in terms of convenience and security. To go one step further, Apple could have won on all counts except it would have disenfranchised the consumer had it prevailed in the element that the judge found in favor of Epic.

I believe that we will look back and realize that rather than Apple losing, companies that want to use the App store to sell product will have to comply with Apple's wishes.

So how come this decision was so opaque to so many? We have all become conditioned on Wall Street that if any plaintiff winds a temporary restraining order, the loser is pretty much done for.

Unfortunately for Apple, is it difficult to figure out what it can do to cure the judge's finding that it violated the state law on steering. Suffice it to say, though, it could inform people rather easily that if they want to, they can go outside the App store to buy anything it wants. The problem is, of course, who wants to do that?

One of the reasons I have said over and over is that you should own Apple's stock, not trade it, is because with Apple the customer is always right. The judge, Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, seemed to want to find against Apple because Apple is so powerful but being powerful does not mean being a monopolist and, in what can only be described as ridiculously ironic, Apple would have to side against its core customer in favor of a big rich company if it wanted to avoid any antitrust consequences.

Lawsuits are messy and not easily factored in. We have some in 3M (MMM) about ground water that we can't figure out the potential consequences. Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) has a boatload of suits against it for talc in baby powder and a possible linkage to cancer.

Nobody knows what those suits will be worth to the plaintiffs. But in this one, it's pretty easy: it's worth nothing.

Apple won.

Epic lost.

(Apple is a holding in Jim Cramer's Action Alerts PLUS member club. Want to be alerted before Jim Cramer buys or sells AAPL? Learn more now.)

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust, is long AAPL.

TAGS: Litigation | Investing | Markets | Stocks | Trading | Technology | Jim Cramer |

More from Jim Cramer

Jim Cramer: I'll Put My Money With 'Boring but Lucrative' Any Day

Jim Cramer
Sep 29, 2021 1:28 PM EDT

Let's look at that recent downgrade of 'dull' Morgan Stanley and see why exciting is best left for the stadiums and amusement parks -- and not stocks.

Jim Cramer: America's Toughest Job? Finding Workers

Jim Cramer
Sep 28, 2021 12:17 PM EDT

It's the question of our time: Where are the people willing to take on these better paying gigs? Let's see what's going on and what we need to happen.

Jim Cramer: Here's How Analysts Can Be Off By a Wide Margin

Jim Cramer
Sep 24, 2021 12:02 PM EDT

Let's look at the reactions to Nike, Costco and Salesforce to see what happens when they're viewed from a real world perspective.

Jim Cramer: It's Pure Insanity That We Don't Make Chips Here in the U.S.

Jim Cramer
Sep 23, 2021 11:05 AM EDT

While the big guns meet at the White House about the global chip shortage, the president and these companies are approaching this all wrong.

Jim Cramer: Go Ahead, Have a Cow, but I Say Powell and Xi Are Bulls

Jim Cramer
Sep 22, 2021 3:51 PM EDT

We rallied, because China's President Xi and Fed Chair Powell made decisions that they knew would lead to rallies.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 05:00 PM EDT CHRIS VERSACE

    AAP Podcast on the Fed Decision!

    Listen here!
  • 02:38 PM EDT REAL MONEY

    Fed Hikes Rates 25 Basis Points

    Here's what stood out in the statement.
  • 10:28 AM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    There are exceptions to conventional trading wisdo...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2023 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login