• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Doug Kass
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Jim Cramer
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Jim Cramer

Jim Cramer: Think Stocks Are Too Pricey? These Big Takeovers Prove They're Not

We're seeing lots of companies snapping up their peers, and the market is applauding.
By JIM CRAMER
Nov 25, 2019 | 04:14 PM EST
Stocks quotes in this article: SCHW, AMTD, GS, AAPL, LVMUY, TIF, EL, CRM, NVS, MDCO, KSS, GPS, M, FL, SPLK, NEWR, CYBR, FTNT, CRWD, FEYE, ZEN, RNG, FIVN, BMRN, BIIB, ABBV, BMY, SQ, UBER, GRUB, NVDA, MLNX, NXPI, QRVO, SWKS

Who keeps saying stocks are expensive? If they are so expensive, then why are we seeing such large takeovers and why do they make so much sense, at least if you judge the stock price of the acquirer. When the buyer's stock goes higher or at least stays in the realm, that's a sign that the market approved and applauds, and that's a big reason why we could rally now.

Sometimes deals make so much sense it's astonishing to think about why they didn't happen before. When discount broker Robin Hood eliminated commissions, counting on credit balances -- your assets -- to make money, it was a natural that all the discounters had to follow so, of course, their stocks were clocked.

Charles Schwab (SCHW) , with $3.8 billion in assets under management, took advantage of the sad state of the stock prices and swooped in to buy TD Ameritrade (AMTD) at a nice price of $26 billion and, voila, now they have $5 trillion under management. I remember a time when Goldman Sachs (GS) debated buying little Charles Schwab. Look out $80 billion Goldman, Schwab's only $20 billion less and gaining on you, although I have to wonder if a Schwab doesn't have a better business model than a Goldman right now and, unless the credit card with Apple (AAPL) turns out to be huge, Goldman has some real catching up to do, as it could double assets under management and still not be near the new colossus.

Lots of critics sneered at how much LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton  (LVMUY)  had to pay up for Tiffany (TIF) , $16 billion, or $135 a share, given it was at $90 a little more than a month ago. But if it were such a bad deal, why would the stock of the acquirer go higher like it did? I think Tiffany, which had pretty horrible numbers worldwide, didn't understand the new world, which is one of personalization and high touch. For years, Tiffany has missed numbers, frequently blaming the strong dollar, which hurts tourism. It went to extremes at one time when it blamed Trump tower traffic after the election.

What a crock. Do you think Estee Lauder (EL) , which sells a huge amount of expensive cosmetics in Hong Kong, used the riots as an excuse this quarter? They hurt sales, but EL has such good businesses around the globe it didn't matter.

Both EL and LVMH know about high touch. Now Tiffany will learn. What's really worth noting here is that LVMH was a marque account that was lauded at Salesforce.com's (CRM)  Dreamforce last week. LVMH salespeople seem to know everything about you when you shop at one of their stores. Tiffany seems to draw a blank when you walk in. I don't know a soul who, when you spend that kind of money at Tiffany's, doesn't want both recognition and help. Watch that store's numbers go way up all over the world.

How should the stock of an acquirer act after it agrees to a price for a company that's 340% above where it was trading at when the year began? How about higher? That's what happened when Novartis (NVS) announced it was buying the stock of Medicines Company for $9.7 billion this weekend. This is a huge one, because The Medicines Company (MDCO) has a shot that lowers your cholesterol that needs to be given twice a year. The current standard of care for how you lower cholesterol requires two shots a month and is very difficult to get insurance approval. Novartis is developing a considerable heart franchise and this one fits into that agenda perfectly.

Now here's what happens when other businesses see stocks go higher after buyers shell out big bucks. They get interested, too.

So you can expect more mergers going forward.

What industries are likely to have more activity? Let me give you some sectors that would make sense.

First: Retail. We are seeing a series of haves and have nots in retail, and you know we are overstored. No, that does not mean that Kohl's (KSS) , Gap (GPS) or Macy's (M) will get bids. They are cheap and profitable, but I don't know if any company can figure out how to reverse its fortunes. But there are some underperforming retailers that represent attractive opportunities. I can't believe how cheap Foot Locker (FL)  is, even as it had terrific comps. I know the Nordstrom brothers don't want to sell, but that quarter wasn't greeted with the love it should have gotten given that the company now has a very good off-line and online.

There are way too many cyber security, call center and data mining companies. Splunk (SPLK) just reported a fantastic quarter. It could be a consolidator. Should New Relic (NEWR) , Cyberark (CYBR) , Fortinet (FTNT) , Crowdstrike (CRWD) , FireEye (FEYE) , Zendesk (ZEN) , RingCentral (RNG) and Five9 (FIVN)  all be independent? I don't think so.

There are so many biotechs out there that have so much going for them with stocks that should be much higher. How does BioMarin (BMRN) stay this low, with a solid business and an amazing pipeline? If Biogen (BIIB) does have the answer to Alzheimer's, it is worth a lot more than $54 billion. Look at how great the stocks of AbbVie (ABBV) and Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY) have done after their acquisitions.

We have about a thousand more banks than we need. I know a lot of that is because of fear that the regulators won't allow the big dogs to buy anyone. But banks with terrific technology can crush it if they buy banks with inferior tech. Payments? We have too make payment companies and I think that if Square (SQ) doesn't get its price higher that's a natural to be acquired. It's got a fantastic installed base and is loved.

You know that there needs to be consolidation in the food delivery business. Can you imagine what would happen to the stocks of Uber (UBER) and GrubHub (GRUB) if GrubHub were to buy Uber Eats? It would be incredible.

I know that semi deals are problematic, because of the need for Chinese approval. If Nvidia (NVDA) were ever able to buy Mellanox (MLNX) you could take numbers up dramatically. But it sure would make sense for NXP Semiconductors (NXPI) , Qorvo (QRVO) , and Skyworks (SWKS) to make some combinations happen. There are just way too many of them.

They don't all have the beautiful synergy of Schwab-Ameritrade, where you can cut your ad budget, reduce your tech spend and fire an immense number of people. They don't have the elegance of marrying LVMH's sophisticated tech with Tiffany's brand name. You don't always get a whole new pipeline for $9 billion the way Novartis did.

But my first point remains the same. While it is absolutely true that a company that may have too big a market cap will never get acquired, there are thousands that don't and, after today, I am tired of hearing how expensive they are. Yes, many companies aren't worth anything to anybody, because they are doing so badly, but many, many more are doing well and we just need to open our eyes to know that's exactly where we are.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.
TAGS: Mergers and Acquisitions | Stocks | Jim Cramer |

More from Jim Cramer

Jim Cramer: Let's Win the Trade War With China

Jim Cramer
Dec 6, 2019 11:18 AM EST

If the Chinese really want a substantive deal, they must renounce their ways and start playing fair with our nation.

Jim Cramer: Five Below Is a Winner in Tariff Mitigation

Jim Cramer
Dec 5, 2019 7:42 AM EST

How companies talk about tariffs is becoming a defining characteristic going forward.

Jim Cramer: Why Yesterday's Hot Stock Is Today's Dud

Jim Cramer
Dec 4, 2019 4:28 PM EST

The purpose is not to shake you out, although it can feel like that; here's what's really going on.

Jim Cramer: How Salesforce is Seeking Truth, and Why It Matters

Jim Cramer
Dec 4, 2019 7:41 AM EST

Marc Benioff is aiming to become a trusted partner with client data, and that will win out over Mark Zuckerberg's manufactured arguments on free speech.

Jim Cramer: Trade Talks Just Aren't That Big of a Deal to U.S.' Advance

Jim Cramer
Dec 3, 2019 3:18 PM EST

Let me tell you why this China trade game is only an impediment a relatively small amount of the market, and what to expect going forward.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 01:06 PM EST CAROLYN BORODEN

    MRK and LVS Targets Coming Up

    View Chart » View in New Window »  LVS View C...
  • 12:01 PM EST BOB LANG

    Rolling up Apple

    just the other day we added some apple calls on th...
  • 12:24 PM EST GARY BERMAN

    Fibocall: The SPX-Cash Long-Term View

    You will hear from many analysts on TV screaming t...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2019 TheStreet, Inc., 14 Wall Street, 15th Fl, NY, NY 10005

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login