• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Stocks

Pausing for Thought, Parsing GDP, Laying Out a Game Plan, Sizing Up Big Tech

Plus, we check out up the bevy of reasons for this week's negative market behavior.
By STEPHEN GUILFOYLE
Oct 30, 2020 | 07:54 AM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: AAPL, TWTR, FB, GOOGL, AMZN, ABBV, CVX, CL, XOM, HON, LHX, BCC

37 Minutes

That's how long I sat at my desk this morning before I typed anything. Equity index futures markets are trading decisively lower, but do seem to have rallied well off of the overnight lows while I did nothing. Maybe I shouldn't move at all.

No, I don't believe in superstition. Not much. I played ice hockey from high school through college and then in men's recreational leagues through age 38. More dislocated shoulders and broken ribs than you would believe if I told you. Team won? Scored a goal? Decent plus/minus? Just played relatively well? I wore the same tee shirt under my pads for almost every game played over approximately 23 years until it literally fell apart. Only changed shirts if I played poorly, and then it would not take much to change it back. Superstition? Don't believe in it.

Fact is that there are a bevy of reasons for this week's negative market behavior. I wrote to you on Thursday that traders would likely try to rally the markets ahead of the big tech (and tech-related) earnings releases. They did try, and for a while there all was well, especially after President Trump mentioned the size of a potential stimulus package that would magically materialize once he is re-elected next week. Keyword-reading algorithms picked up on this and markets accelerated to the upside.

Then something ugly happened that gave me the "queezies" going into Thursday night's Super Bowl of earnings. The very same algorithms (an assumption on my part, but it's not like I haven't been around the block a couple times) that ramped the indices higher turned around and took profits, picking off traders with slightly slower (or maybe outdated) algorithmic models.

The selling continued and became severe over the final 10 to 15 minutes of the regular session. It was then that I realized that earnings beats might not be good enough. "They" had schooled those less-sophisticated humans once again. As for those earnings reports? They were mostly very good. The guidance? Not really bad at all, unless not offered, as in the case of Apple (AAPL) . Just not overwhelmingly good on every level. Sold.

Of Course

Of course, the action that I just described is what occurs at a very granular level that likely goes unnoticed by investors who just might do something else occupationally. For those who spend their productive hours splitting atoms or lugging around 80-pound bags of cement, what you saw at day's end was a market that displayed some decent strength across most levels. Nine of 11 sectors traded higher. The Dow Industrials were a little sluggish, but everything else looked pretty good, from smaller to mid-caps, to the Transports, to the Nasdaq indices.

Breadth was excellent, but.... and this is the giveaway.. but aggregate trading volume tailed off significantly from Wednesday's terrific equity beatdown to Thursday's "not quite all the way back" day. Not quite all the way back to Wednesday's highs, not quite all the way back to the 50-day simple moving average (SMA), and miles away from where we went out last Friday. Ahh, the good old days. Back when the spread of this awful virus was worsening, but not quite like this, back when we could at least pretend that our elected officials might compromise for the good of the citizenry, and back when electoral risk seemed just plain less risky (or maybe just more distant).

A good day, but not quite all the way back. Kind of a microcosm of what we saw in third-quarter GDP. A very good quarter, but not quite all the way back.

Now, what does the spread of this awful virus do to what was supposed to be continued strength through the fourth quarter, in terms of both corporate performance and overall economic activity?

On GDP

Hey, let's not knock the third quarter. The economy is light years ahead of what most of us even imagined possible just a few months ago. What is at stake is the momentum, which has been excellent. While too many remain unemployed, and there is undoubtedly a broad uncertainty if not despair spreading across households and businesses that just cannot do "work from home" and still provide, regional economies have reopened quickly enough and fully enough to allow for a significant quarterly rebound.

Bright spots were seen in personal consumption for both durable goods and services, as well as in gross private domestic investment in new equipment and across the residential space. Then again, folks in trouble, and even businesses in trouble, were lent a helping hand through rapid and effective policy implementation. That was "yesterday's roast beef."

The tremendous third-quarter economic performance leaves the U.S. economy a rough 3.5% smaller than it was pre-pandemic. To get not just back to where the economy was, but back on (Trump years) trend, the fourth quarter will need to show annualized quarter-over-quarter growth of 4.5%, and then repeat that trick consistently for maybe eight or nine quarters in a row. What do you think? Yeah, me neither, with or without either of our two leading presidential candidates or no matter how the legislature lines up. There has been a (semi) permanent mark made on U.S. and global economies. Entire occupations have evolved, there will be no return to an old normal. Oh, FYI... the government in France just reduced that nation's estimate for full-year 2020 GDP here on Friday morning.

Know the difference

Zero Dark Thirty Mindset. Game plan. What do I think as we head into this Friday before Election Day trading session as Europe partially shuts down again, and as the virus spreads rapidly across the U.S.? I think the U.S. dollar once again threatens to become too strong. This will make it hard for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude to hold onto that $36 handle. The stars are aligned for another risk-off day to end a risk-off week.

As an equity trader, I head into this day with two themes in my mind. One, respect your panic points. Never allow a loss of greater than 8% on any position unless it happens overnight on gap lower. You can't help those. Usually, though, traders move panic points higher as stocks move higher, sort of a mental trailing stop. This is how professionals minimize losses, or even book profits when something they own takes a dive.

Two, be afraid to purchase new names where the trader has no prior history. I mean, you do what you want to. This is what works for me. That does not mean that I will be afraid to deploy any capital at all. I will feel free to add... to investments, but not to trades. Your job, if you play this sport for a living, is to know the difference.

What About Those Big Tech Names?

1) Twitter (TWTR) is lower after missing user growth expectations. I would not buy these shares, not just based on this metric, but based upon what is the expected electoral outcome next week. Does anyone really enjoy Twitter? Will any casual user even log on, if say on Jan. 20 someone new takes the oath of office? If I owned this one, I would sell it ahead of the election.

2) Facebook (FB) appears to have navigated the ad boycott (oh, yeah, forgot about that) quite well; however, user growth does appear to be wavering in North America. Hard pass on FB today.

3) Alphabet (GOOGL) crushed it, returning to revenue growth for the quarter reported. I should be long this name. I have not been. Today is not the day to chase the one of these names swimming upstream. Perhaps on some other, sunnier day.

4) Apple will show weakness today as iPhone sales missed estimates and demand slowed severely in the China region. No forecast is either a bad omen, or a perfect set-up. 5G-inspired Super Cycle? Can't count it out. Neither will the market. I will almost certainly add to this position this afternoon.

5) My favorite, Amazon (AMZN) , put together a simply fabulous quarter. The stock is trading lower for two reasons. Covid-related expenses are guided much higher than they were six months ago. This could pressure margins, despite robust (but maybe below whisper numbers) revenue guidance for the fourth quarter. I would like to add to his name, but not here. The stock still trades too far above net basis for me, and I am not sure how much capital I want to allocate to any one name. I am not even close to thinking about making a sale.

Economics (All Times Eastern)

08:30 - Personal Income (Sep): Expecting 0.4% m/m, Last -2.7% m/m.

08:30 - Consumer Spending (Sep): Expecting 1.0% m/m, Last 1.0% m/m.

08:30 - PCE Price Index (Sep): Expecting 1.5% y/y, Last 1.4% y/y.

08:30 - Core PCE Price Index (Sep): Expecting 1.7% y/y, Last 1.6% y/y.

08:30 - Employment Cost index (Q3): Expecting 0.6% q.q, Last 0.5% q/q.

09:45 - Chicago PMI (Oct): Expecting 58.7, Last 62.4.

10:00 - U of M Consumer Sentiment (Oct-F): Flashed 81.2.

13:00 - Baker Hughes Oil Rig Count (Weekly): Last 211.

The Fed (All Times Eastern)

Fed Blackout Period.

Today's Earnings Highlights (Consensus EPS Expectations)

Before the Open: (ABBV) (2.77), (CVX) (-.24), (CL) (.70), (XOM) (-.24), (HON) (1.49), (LHX) (2.74)

After the Close: (BCC) (1.69)

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Guilfoyle was long ABBV, AAPL and AMZN equity.

TAGS: Earnings | Investing | Stocks | Media | Technology | Advertising | E-Commerce | Real Money

More from Stocks

Fed Talk Prompts Some Buying

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
May 17, 2022 4:37 PM EDT

This is still just bear-market bounce, but that doesn't mean it can't run for a while.

J.B. Hunt's 18 Wheelers Are Ready to Roll Again

Bruce Kamich
May 17, 2022 1:15 PM EDT

Let's see what the charts and indicators look like.

You Don't Have to Takes Sides on Apple (If Your Timing Is Right)

Ed Ponsi
May 17, 2022 11:51 AM EDT

It appears that hedge fund owner Michael Burry is betting against AAPL and Warren Buffett is betting on the stock. But let's look at their strategies and why they might both turn out winners.

Home Depot Can Make a Recovery Rebound

Bruce Kamich
May 17, 2022 11:47 AM EDT

Let's take a look at the charts.

Walmart's Results Are Ugly, But For Now It's Tradable

Stephen Guilfoyle
May 17, 2022 11:20 AM EDT

Walmart is technically oversold, and deservedly so based on the fundamentals.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 03:07 PM EDT PAUL PRICE

    Why is Wal-Mart Down Big Today?

    Besides its poor earnings report Wal-Mart (WMT) wa...
  • 07:14 PM EDT PAUL PRICE

    A New, Very Scary Movie

  • 08:51 AM EDT PAUL PRICE

    Advice From the Future...

  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2022 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login