• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Doug Kass
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Jim Cramer
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Stocks

Making Sausage: How the Fitbit Deal Got Done

A document filed with the SEC reveals the behind-the-scenes competition between Alphabet and another suitor for the hand of the smartwatch maker.
By JONATHAN HELLER
Nov 27, 2019 | 11:00 AM EST
Stocks quotes in this article: FIT, GOOGL, FB

I thought I'd finally written my final column that referenced Fitbit Inc. (FIT) , but not so fast. It looks like there's a postscript (hopefully the last) in the aftermath of the company's agreement to be acquired by Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) for $7.35 share that was announced Nov. 1.

On Tuesday, a Preliminary Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) revealed how the deal unfolded, and it was enough to create a small buzz in the markets.

According to the filing, there was actually a mini-bidding war for Fitbit. Here's the brief version: On June 11, the CEO of an entity referred to as "Party A" had dinner with Fitbit CEO James Park. Another dinner followed in July, with CEOs present, as well as members of respective management teams. A confidentiality agreement was signed in August with "Party A."

Meanwhile, by July, Fitibit had signed Qatalyst Partners as its financial advisor in pursuing a sale of the company. Late that month, Qatalyst contacted nine "strategic parties" to gauge potential interest in acquiring Fitibt. Three, referred to as "Party B", "Party C" and "Party D," expressed interest. In September, all three dropped out of contention.

Days later on Sept. 24, "Party A" expressed interest in acquiring Fitbit. Then, on Oct. 2, Alphabet offered $4.59 a share in a non-binding letter of interest. On Oct. 10, Fitbit's board of directors rejected Alphabet's bid but stated that it would consider a bid of $6.00 a share. The next day, Alphabet increased the offer to $5.05 a share.

On Oct. 12, the CEO of "Party A" made a verbal offer to Fitbit CEO Park of $5.90 a share. Qatalyst informed Alphabet there was a higher bid, and on the same day Alphabet raised its bid to $6.50 a share. Fitbit then approached Alphabet and "Party A" requesting that each submit their "best and final proposal," which would need to include a reverse $250 million termination fee, to be paid to Fitbit in the event a deal could not close due to antitrust rulings.

Still, the same day, the CEO of "Party A" reached out to Park, asking him to provide a specific price that would allow the two companies to enter negotiations. Park declined to do so, and "Party A" dropped out of contention, or so it appeared.

Later that day, Alphabet revised its bid to $7.05 a share and agreed to the reverse termination fee. That evening, the CEO of "Party A" again contacted Park and offered $7.30 a share, but did not address the reverse termination fee. Alphabet was then informed that another entity had made a higher bid. The next day, Alphabet submitted a written proposal, offering $7.35 a share, and agreed to the reverse termination fee. The rest, as they say, is history. The deal was announced Nov. 1.

The thing that made Tuesday's disclosure of this process so interesting is that Fitbit rose 3% in pre-market trading in reaction, almost as though some thought the bidding war might not be over. In addition, there was unconfirmed speculation Tuesday reported by CNBC that Facebook Inc. (FB) was indeed "Party A." (Alphabet and Facebook are holdings of Jim Cramer's Action Alerts PLUS charitable trust.)

I am just happy to move on from FIT. It ended up being a profitable trade, but with many ups and more downs. It was profitable because a good portion of the position was taken when the stock was near its lows. Little did I know, at the time, how low the initial bids actually were.
Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Heller had no positions in the stocks mentioned.

TAGS: Mergers and Acquisitions | Investing | Stocks | Consumer | Technology | Real Money

More from Stocks

PPG Has Come Roaring Back to New Highs

Bruce Kamich
Apr 22, 2021 9:44 AM EDT

A real company with real earnings and real growth.

Marvell Technology Now Displays a Bullish Picture

Bruce Kamich
Apr 22, 2021 8:40 AM EDT

We are no longer standing aside.

Netflix and Snap Charts Say Wait for More Pullback Action to Buy

Ed Ponsi
Apr 22, 2021 8:30 AM EDT

The stocks of the streaming giant and the social media company appear to have additional downside ahead.

Qualtrics International Sees Its Charts Greatly Improve

Bruce Kamich
Apr 22, 2021 7:52 AM EDT

The technical signals indicate a bit more aggressive buying of its shares of late.

Now Comes the Hard Job of Building on Wednesday's Bounce

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
Apr 22, 2021 7:36 AM EDT

The heavy selling pressure on certain areas of the market lifted, but generating more positive momentum will not be easy.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 07:35 AM EDT BOB LANG

    Join Me for a Special Earth Day Webinar, Talking Volatility and VIX

    After the close Thursday join me for a free webina...
  • 04:17 PM EDT REAL MONEY

    Wednesday on Real Money Pro

    Get-rich quick schemes offer little more than pipe...
  • 11:09 AM EDT GARY BERMAN

    S&P Futures

    FIBOCALL: The S&P futures was off 1.5 %... ...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2021 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login