• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • TheStreet Smarts
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Stocks

Jim Cramer: Elon Musk's Contempt Citation Is Beyond the SEC

This is about an attack on the Judiciary, and Judge Alison Nathan is likely to act swiftly. How should Tesla shareholders respond?
By JIM CRAMER Mar 19, 2019 | 07:12 AM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: TSLA

Are we, who seek to know every twist and turn of Tesla's (TSLA) stock, not paying attention to the contempt of court fight between Elon Musk and the SEC? Are we not understanding of what could be the immense ramifications for Tesla shareholders of the riposte filed last night by the SEC in the federal court of Alison Nathan, Southern District of New York?

Right now, at this very moment, a serious jurist, Judge Nathan, is trying to decide exactly how it could be that there be not one, but two people in this country, who think they can post anything they want on Twitter, no matter what. The difference is that unlike Donald Trump, this one is before her court, and she can do something about it.

On the surface, there isn't much here. Musk is claiming that the SEC, with its contempt citation demanding adequate safeguards prohibiting him from discussing material aspects of Tesla's business on Twitter or elsewhere, is hampering his first amendment rights.

I don't know where Musk can get lawyers who write this stuff up with a straight face, because, when you go beneath the surface, they are abetting Musk in trashing the process, the process that not just the SEC, but also the Judiciary, live by.

First, this case has nothing whatsoever to do with the First Amendment. As part of the contempt agreement, Musk agreed to waive his First Amendment rights, putting the company in charge of policing him with a pre-approval process, a process we discovered was a total sham.

The SEC professed it was "stunning to learn" that Musk had not sought pre-approval for a single one of the numerous tweets he published in the months since the court-ordered pre-approval went into effect.

Second, even a cursory read-through of the SEC's brief shows that Musk tried to puff his stock by Tweeting on February 19, 2019 at 7:15 p.m. "Tesla made 0 cars in 2011 but will make around 500,000 cards in 2019."

That's why, the agency contends, after meeting with counsel, he came back on Twitter at 11:41 p.m. ET, that same night -- tweeting he "meant to say annualized production rate at end of 2019 around 500,000 cars, i.e. 10k cars /week, deliveries still estimated to be about 400,000."

The agency appends not one but two pieces of research, one from Wedbush from December 13 and one from Deutsche Bank from a year ago, explaining how run rates determine the valuation of the enterprise.

Now, again, I am astonished by the outrageousness of Musk's lawyers in arguing on behalf of the man that, even if there is no First Amendment right for Musk, he still has a right to determine what tweets are not material to the stock -- and if they are material and his counsel says they are material he can correct them as he did in the second Tweet on February 19 of this year.

That alleged process, the SEC argues shows a "brazen disregard of this court's order" and is "unacceptable and unworkable."

In other words, the SEC is saying "hey, we can't control this guy, but we don't have to anymore, it's your problem." Musk may think his beef is still with the SEC. He even told Leslie Stahl on 60 Minutes last December that he would respect the settlement because of the court. "I want to be clear I do not respect the SEC. I do not respect them," he told Stahl. She shot back: "But you're abiding by the settlement aren't you?" Musk replied: "Because I respect the Justice System."

And therein is why Musk is really in trouble. This contempt citation has nothing whatsoever to do with the SEC. It has everything to do with Judge Nathan, a distinguished Obama Judge, and I believe she isn't going to put up with this nonsense anymore. She, too, is a process persona, and this case is all about the process of the Judiciary -- and it cannot be attacked without pretty severe repercussions.

And here's where it gets difficult for Tesla shareholders. The whole contempt process is about having an orderly system of justice. The SEC is saying to the Judge Nathan that Musk represents a material threat to the settlement process that Nathan is overseeing.

How can he be stopped if a $20 million fine and the stripping of the chairmanship and a bevy of controls put on him meant nothing?

As I see it, Judge Nathan is boxed in. Her fine order and court ordered process to protect the public from his tweets to his 25 million followers meant absolutely nothing, as the process was never used and is a total sham. She can't fine him again. $20 million meant nothing to the man. She can't trust the attorneys involved in trying to rein him in; it was never invoked. She can't trust the board to do anything at all about him, or it would have removed him from the CEO job to spare the shareholders from his tweets.

So she can only trust herself to do something about it, because this one is now out of the SEC's hands.

As I see it, she has the following choices:

1. She can remove him from the CEO job so he no longer has the ability to even know what is material and can't speak for the company. That may be necessary, because it is obvious on the face of it that Musk can't control himself and doesn't even want to have a process that he agreed to.

2. She can make the violation criminal and actually sentence him to prison. That is a hard call, but one that would per se remove him from the right to be running a public company.

3. She can put a special master on the board to control him.

I can't see any other way out of this, because the attack on the court itself, and Nathan in particular, is so outrageous.

How any of this can be good news for stockholders is beyond me.

Remember, the SEC isn't even trying to say that Musk manipulated the stock. It isn't saying this is Musk versus the SEC. It's Musk versus a jurist, a real bad call for Musk himself.

Which brings me to the heart of the question. If you own stock, do you want Musk to be important to Tesla? Would you buy the stock without him running the place?

That's the real issue at stake in Judge Nathan v. Musk -- and this whole First Amendment dodge will be seen as both silly and repugnant to Nathan, as silly and as repugnant as the idea that this man and his toothless board and attorneys cares one whit about the process she ordered. I think it is fair to say that he's gone beyond the stage where he will just accept a Twitter block.

At this stage, a master would be a win for shareholders. Everything else a loss. This is the closest the company has come to losing Musk. The betting here after this assault on the Judiciary itself is that he's banned from anything more than operations, because he can't be counted on to be representative of the company itself, so he can't manipulate the stock even if he wanted to. He will be made into a pariah at his own company.

It's a shame. None of this matters. I think Nathan will find his Twitter addiction to be pathological -- and unless she wants to make a mockery of her own bench, he will soon be gone.

Will You Have Enough Money to Retire?

Want to learn about retirement planning from some of the nation's top experts? Join TheStreet's Robert "Mr. Retirement" Powell live in New York on April 6 for our Retirement Strategies Symposium. For a limited time, tickets are available for $99 for this full-day event. Check out the agenda, learn about the speakers and sign up here.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust, had no positions in the stock mentioned.

TAGS: Regulation | Litigation | Investing | Politics | Stocks |

More from Stocks

In a Week Full of Surprises, This Was the Market's Biggest

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
Feb 3, 2023 4:42 PM EST

We had the Fed's rate decision, jobs numbers, and mega-cap tech earnings land. But here's what was the wildest action.

3 High-Yield REITs for Safe Dividend Income

Bob Ciura
Feb 3, 2023 2:31 PM EST

These names have joined the ranks of the world's most elite dividend growth companies as Dividend Aristocrats and/or Dividend Kings.

Holy Fed, Batman! FAANG Has a Major Toothache!

Jim Collins
Feb 3, 2023 12:23 PM EST

Here's why the markets are sounding a lot like the campy 'Batman' show -- and how to make sure you don't succumb to the market's Joker.

Apple Is Far Better Positioned Than Amazon or Alphabet: Here's the Trade

Stephen Guilfoyle
Feb 3, 2023 12:20 PM EST

One thing is clear: Apple's disappointments are far more correctable, and their cash flow is more diversified than either AMZN or GOOGL.

Why Is Sector Allocation So Important Now?

Maleeha Bengali
Feb 3, 2023 11:00 AM EST

The fact of the matter is that the Fed knows as much as the market does, or perhaps even less.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 02:58 PM EST REAL MONEY

    Sarge Guilfoyle Breaks Down the Jobs Report, Fed Policy and Stocks!

    Watch it here!
  • 11:35 AM EST JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    Trading an Irrational Market
  • 02:10 PM EST REAL MONEY

    Fed Rate Decision

    Fed Lifts Benchmark Rate by 25 Basis Points, Sees ...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2023 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login