• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Stocks

It's 'Active' Vs. 'Passive' and the Winner Is ...

Both, actually. But the one who came out way ahead might surprise you.
By JONATHAN HELLER
Oct 19, 2020 | 02:00 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: FIT, ASTE, HZO, JOUT, RAMP, NPK, CWGL, DRQ, GOOGL, CYBE, AMSC

The results are in for last year's Triple Net Active vs. Passive Portfolio experiment, and I am both surprised and pleased by the results.

My plan was to identify a group of companies trading at a relatively low level of net current asset value, to see if they could outperform selected benchmarks as a group -- the "Passive Portfolio" group. The idea was also to see whether a hand-selected subset -- the "Active Portfolio" group -- could outperform the Passive one. In this case, the level of net current asset value was between 2-times and 3-times -- I call these "triple-nets."

Both portfolios exceeded my initial expectations, but the Active one won by a landslide, going up 37.2%. Still, even the Passive Portfolio was up 20.3%, which was well ahead of the benchmarks I've used:

Russell 2000 Index: up 6.9%

Russell 2000 Value Index: down 9.3%

Russell Microcap Index: up 11.3%

Russell Microcap Value Index: down 5.3%

Six of the eight names in the Active Portfolio were in positive territory, led by Fitbit (FIT) (up 105%). Early on, FIT was doing all of the heavy lifting in terms of returns, but in the end, Astec Industries (ASTE) (up 87%), MarineMax (HZO) (up 84%), Johnson Outdoors (JOUT) (up 48%) and LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) (up 45%) all made significant contributions. National Presto (NPK) (up 8%) managed to limp into positive territory. The laggards were Crimson Wine Group (CWGL) (down 33%) and Dril-Quip (DRQ) (down 51%). I still own the disappointing (CWGL) , which now trades at just 1.51-times net current asset value, but sold FIT when Alphabet  (GOOGL) made its offer to acquire the company last November. This year, I will own all names in the Active Portfolio, which will be rolled out on Wednesday and Friday.

In the Passive Portfolio, 29 names were in positive territory, led in order by Cyberoptics (CYBE) (+160%), American Semiconductor (AMSC) (up 113%), and the top three names in the Active Portfolio, FIT, ASTE and HZO. That I ended up picking three of the top five overall performers for the Active Portfolio was, in my view, mitigated by picking two of the bottom five, CWGL and DRQ, the worst overall performer.

Still, this was a worthy pursuit, and may provide some small evidence that there are still areas of the market where active management can outperform passive. In a way, even the Passive Portfolio in this endeavor has some active qualities; namely that triple-nets are a subset of the small and microcap universes.

In late 2018, in a less formal Active vs Passive triple-net experiment -- in which I did not provide monthly updates -- the Passive approach ended up winning. That year, those singled out as my favorites were dominated by retailers, and underperformed. Last year's Active Portfolio was a bit more balanced in terms of sector/industry representation, and I expect that this year's will be as well.

The performance of "triple-nets" overall in the past year was stellar, and whether that was luck, or whether there is actually something to the concept is up for debate.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Heller was long CWGL.

TAGS: ETFs | Investing | Investing basics | Stocks

More from Stocks

Does the Big Bounce Mean More to Come? Let's See What Drove the Move

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
Jun 24, 2022 4:42 PM EDT

Much of the rally can be attributed to structural reasons, not fundamentals, technicals, or even macro ones.

MongoDB Is Poised for a Rally

Bruce Kamich
Jun 24, 2022 2:15 PM EDT

Here's our initial upside price target for MDB which provides a general purpose database platform.

See That Down the Road? It's the Big 'Green' Bubble, Ready to Pop

Jim Collins
Jun 24, 2022 1:30 PM EDT

Environmental, social, and corporate governance has created a monster and gullible investors should hit the brakes on their EVs and run from the Washington technocrats while they have the chance.

When Times Are Tough, These 3 Mega-Caps Should Deliver the Dividends

Bob Ciura
Jun 24, 2022 1:00 PM EDT

Here's why in recessions and bear markets, the right mega-cap stocks can offer security -- and good yields.

Atlassian Is Now in the Latter Stages of Its Decline

Bruce Kamich
Jun 24, 2022 12:22 PM EDT

Let's check the charts and indicators.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 10:48 PM EDT PAUL PRICE

    More Insider Buying in American Woodmark (AWMD)

    American Woodmark , which I've discussed here fre...
  • 08:55 AM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    The 10 personality traits of successful traders an...
  • 12:08 PM EDT STEPHEN GUILFOYLE

    Stocks Under $10

    As a Portfolio Name Agrees to a Merger, Here's Our...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2022 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login