• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • TheStreet Smarts
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Stocks

IPO Investors Should Take Note of Pinterest's Dual Class Share Structure

Pinterest isn't exactly bringing the power to the people.
By KEVIN CURRAN Apr 18, 2019 | 11:05 AM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: LYFT, JPM, GS, PINS, FB, TSLA, SNAP

IPO investors looking to pick up shares of Pinterest (PINS) on Thursday should be aware of what exactly they're getting.

In its initial public offering on Thursday, Pinterest is offering 75,000,000 shares of its Class A common stock, plus up to an additional 11,250,000 shares that the underwriters such as Goldman Sachs (GS) and JPMorgan  (JPM) among other big banks have the option to purchase.

The implied demand is already indicating a strong groundswell of support for the offering.

"People want to have a chit -- a name that's internet, that's fresh-faced, that's seen as friendly. .. We're itching for something that's new, that isn't Twitter, that isn't Facebook." - @jimcramer

Pinterest indicated $22-$23$PINS @NYSE

— Carl Quintanilla (@carlquintanilla) April 18, 2019

However, many retail investors might not actually understand what the "Class A" stipulation means and why it could be something that keeps institutions more cautious on the unicorn name.

Dissecting Dual Class Structure

The main factor separating Class A and B shares is voting power.

"The rights of the holders of Class A common stock and Class B common stock will be identical, except with respect to voting, conversion and transfer rights," a Pinterest company filing states. "Each share of Class A common stock will be entitled to one vote. Each share of Class B common stock will be entitled to 20 votes and will be convertible at any time into one share of Class A common stock."

The balance of power as such will largely be retained by those already atop the San Francisco-based social media company's structure, which is aimed at insulating management from activists and short-term pressures.

"All shares of our common stock outstanding immediately prior to this offering, including all shares held by our executive officers and directors, will be reclassified into shares of our Class B common stock immediately prior to the completion of this offering," an SEC filing explained. "The holders of our outstanding shares of Class B common stock will initially hold approximately 99.2% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock following this offering."

The structure is a target for scrutiny among institutional investors who typically want a say in how a company is managed before providing bedrock investments for emerging companies.

Many argue that a lack of activist and institutional investor oversight at companies like Facebook (FB) , Tesla (TSLA) , and Snap Inc. (SNAP) have led to lapses in good governance and shareholder protection as scandals have plagued each company. Uber, a notable upcoming IPO, moved to eliminate a potential dual class structure in 2017 after troubles with its former top man Travis Kalanick.

Wei Jiang, a Chazen Senior Scholar at Columbia Business School, told TheStreet that a dual class structure can make a company "instantly unpopular," especially among larger investors.

Lyft (LYFT) was most recently criticized for a share structure identical to Pinterest's proposed model, adding pressure to its shares that quickly eroded after its IPO.

The message [Lyft's S-1 filing] sends is that the Lyft founders can govern the company as supreme monarchs in perpetuity and also that they have a 'let them eat cake' attitude toward their investors," wrote Council of Institutional Investors executive director Ken Bertsch ahead of the listing.

Pinterest could receive even more pointed criticism for some of its more idiosyncratic stipulations, like the fact that CEO Ben Silbermann will retain his class B shares up to 540 days after his "death or permanent incapacity." A beneficiary for his super-majority of shares is not specified in the filings.

Tangible Example

Institutional investors not only seek to ensure good governance of companies they invest in, but also to achieve stated goals.

For example, the $354 billion California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) recently began an initiative aimed at achieving greater board diversity.

"Simply put, board diversity is good for business," said Anne Simpson, CalPERS investment director, sustainability. "It is essential in today's global economy that boards avoid 'group think' and ensure there is the breadth of experience, skills and knowledge necessary to meet complex business needs."

Pinterest could come under pressure from these types of investors, as 80% of its user base is populated by women, but less than one-third of board members are women. It's C-Suite is also majority male.

Whether this pressure to address gender parity is constructive or not is subject to speculation, but an investor willing to invest the amount that CalPERS can would likely not feel comfortable getting behind a company like Pinterest without the possibility of making its concerns known.

As such, some of the big boys might not be bellying up to the table any time soon.

Regulatory Wrinkles

In another important note for institutions, investors will be getting less information on Pinterest in the path ahead than is generally required for public companies.

"We are an "emerging growth company" as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and will be subject to reduced public company reporting requirements," an SEC filing reveals.

Specifically, the company will be exempt from certain requirements related to executive compensation.

That includes requirements to hold non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation and requirements to provide data on the ratio of total compensation of the CEO to the median compensation of all employees.

"We may take advantage of these exemptions until such time that we are no longer an emerging growth company," company filings state. "We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the completion of this offering, the last day of the fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.07 billion..[or] the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700.0 million as of the prior June 30 and the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period."

The company noted that the JOBS act also allows the company to delay the acceptance of revised accounting standards until such standards apply to private companies.

So, while the path to profitability and the niche market the company occupies could lead to rapid share growth, it might not be enough to assuage the concerns of institutional investors.

The devil is always in the details.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

Employees of TheStreet are restricted from trading individual securities.

TAGS: Corporate Governance | IPOs | Regulation | Potential Activist Target | Executive compensation | Investing | Stocks | Software & Services | E-Commerce | Stock of the Day

More from Stocks

Why Market Indexes Are Often a Poor Measure of What's Really Going On

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
Mar 27, 2023 11:55 AM EDT

We are witnessing one of the most extreme disconnects in decades between the Nasdaq 100 and Russell 2000.

What the Fed Has Wrought

Bret Jensen
Mar 27, 2023 11:00 AM EDT

Damage From the central bank's policy mistakes are likely to keep growing.

Movado Shows Now Isn't the Time to Issue Disappointing Guidance

Jonathan Heller
Mar 27, 2023 10:35 AM EDT

The watchmaker saw its shares hammered on its outlook, which is a cautionary tale for other stocks.

Workday's Stock Looks Ready to Make Further Gains

Bruce Kamich
Mar 27, 2023 10:34 AM EDT

Let's check the charts and indicators.

Caterpillar's Stock Was Hot, Now It's Not: Here's the Trade

Stephen Guilfoyle
Mar 27, 2023 10:15 AM EDT

Two downgrades by a highly rated analyst are not to be taken lightly.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 01:56 PM EDT PETER TCHIR

    Very Cautious

    I am very cautious here. I don't like how the c...
  • 08:58 AM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    How to Adjust Your Trading Style as Market Conditi...
  • 05:00 PM EDT CHRIS VERSACE

    AAP Podcast on the Fed Decision!

    Listen here!
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2023 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login