• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • TheStreet Smarts
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Stocks

Can Bitcoin Be Freed of Its Energy Addiction?

Even bitcoin's biggest bulls realize environmental concerns could curtail adoption. But is there an answer?
By KEVIN CURRAN Sep 17, 2021 | 02:00 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: V

Few investment trends have captured the broader imagination in the same way that bitcoin has. Similarly, few investment rules have overtaken institutional investment strategy as rapidly as ESG -- or environmental, social and governance -- guidelines have.

Unfortunately for bitcoin fans, these two trends appear at loggerheads.

Detailing the Damage

The environmental harm of bitcoin and its mining is by no means a novel discovery. Quantifying the damage, however, is difficult. After all, terawatt hours are not a common unit of measure for most people.

As a simpler reference, the University of Cambridge's bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index estimates that the bitcoin industry consumes about as much electricity as all of the refrigerators in the United States. That is considering a cut in mining activity both as a result of price decreases and shutdowns in bitcoin's most popular mining destinations like China.

Still, energy consumption spent on mining bitcoins is only slated to increase by the cryptocurrency's very design. As only 21 million coins are ever supposed to be available, the system gradually increases the computing power needed to mine a single coin as supply tightens so as to not make all coins immediately available.

In terms of the actual use cases, bitcoin's status as purely an investment does little to assuage worries of wasteful energy use. Meanwhile, the idea of use bitcoin as a currency is distressing to environmentalists as well. Per a Statista estimate released earlier this week, one bitcoin transaction uses over 10 times as much energy as 100,000 swipes of a Visa (V) card.

"At the time bitcoin was structured, it didn't use much energy, the number of users was small, and climate change wasn't exactly an everyday, headline issue yet," Sudhir Roc-Sennett, Head of Thought Leadership and ESG at Vontobel Asset Management, told Real Money. "So it's a new and big problem for bitcoin. There's just no way around the fact that it is a carbon-expensive thing to do."

In that sense, the "E" and "S" of ESG seem hard to marry with the secular shift professed by so many bitcoin evangelists. 

Assessing Opportunity Costs 

Yet, Roc-Sennett was quick to note that out-of-context assessments of environmental impacts are, at best, misleading. In the end, he clarified, one must take stock of the opportunity costs associated with bitcoin's environmental impact.

"It's really down to whether the energy is surplus or not," he explained. "If there really isn't an opportunity cost in utilizing energy for bitcoin mining, miners can generate some income and then pay tax on the income...that would really be a benefit."

Roc-Sennett added, however, that the power used would need to be renewable in itself. The negative indirect costs generated by use of fossil fuels like coal to mine bitcoin, regardless of their surplus nature, would obviously not be compatible with general ESG standards.

The arguments presented by Roc-Sennett support the idea that bitcoin can tap into "stranded" energy assets, or assets that are simply untapped by other industries and therefore wasted. In this sense, common resources are being used and, so long as they do not befall a "tragedy of the commons" scenario and are not inherently environmentally damaging, bitcoin is not a burden on the economy nor is it a burden on society.

Further still, some argue that even the use of some fossil fuels are worthwhile as they are emitting carbon dioxide to absolutely no end in the present system. Blaine Townsend, Senior Vice President & Director, Sustainable, Responsible and Impact Investing at Bailard, cited the practice of burning excess natural gas emitted as a byproduct of oil exploration, known as flaring, as a key example.

"Not only is bitcoin heading down the aisle with energy asset owners, but it could also have a hand in the reduction of gas flaring," he told Real Money. "The International Energy Agency calculated that in the year 2018 this gas flaring released about 275 million metric tons of CO2 emissions. That's more than the carbon emissions of the entirety of Argentina."

By harnessing this gas surplus for bitcoin, Townsend estimates that both CO2 and other harmful emissions of volatile organic compounds can be cut dramatically, while actually doing something with the energy rather than burning it into the atmosphere. 

Still, John Belizaire, CEO of Soluna Computing, a company that primarily seeks to use excess energy to power data centers, argued that bitcoin's still nascent stage leaves it vulnerable to use-case confusion.

"The technology does have a purpose, it is just yet to find its proper place in the world. People can still say, 'what is bitcoin really good for?'," he told Real Money. "Three percent of global energy is utilized by data centers, three times the amount used by bitcoin. The difference is that data centers have a clear purpose in society."

Belizaire surmised that once bitcoin can achieve the aims that its proponents have long forwarded, namely in upending the current financial system that itself is not overwhelmingly environmentally friendly, these qualms will be markedly quieter. The question that remains is how quickly it can overcome current questions about its true purpose.

Seeking a Solution

However, the endgame of shifting the conversation on bitcoin and therefore the crypto space more broadly in terms of environmental impact might necessitate an even more fundamental shift. In fact, the issue of environmental impact may actually push Bitcoin away from the very protocol that made it so popular in the first place.

David Blatt, CEO of financial advisory firm CapStack, told Real Money that a major paradigm shift is already in motion on the heels of amplified ESG importance.

"Many cryptocurrencies are now shifting from proof of work (PoW) that requires power to mine, to proof of stake that does not," he noted. "So we will start to see that become the norm as ESG is very front of mind, particularly for institutional investors that are beginning to adopt crypto."

The protocols cited by Blatt are worth elaboration. At present, bitcoin operates its distributed ledger technology via PoW, which employs mathematical and cryptographic puzzles to ensure peer-to-peer transactions can be performed sans an arbitrator. Additionally, it protects against sybil and denial of service attacks. 

However, this system comes with an inherent flaw not foreseen at its institution. 

"As the currency value and/or utility in a PoW network increases, the consensus mechanism can be problematic from a sustainability perspective," a recent paper from the UCL Centre for Blockchain Technologies explains. "This is because as the network becomes more popular and attracts more activity, the difficulty level of the cryptographic puzzle increases, causing higher energy consumption of the network." 

As a result, many crypto enthusiasts are pursuing alternative authentication systems that might ultimately make ESG and crypto investors arrive at an agreeable solution. Proof of Stake, a method endorsed by Ethereum inventor Vitalik Buterin, may be one of the best ways to do this.

"Rather than computers simultaneously racing to the finish line to complete a puzzle, the proof of stake model assigns one validator to the computation who is rewarded with ether if successful," Bailard's Townsend explained. "With this newly-adopted proof of stake framework, researchers believe that energy consumption could drop massively to 1/10,000th of the amount needed currently." 

The recent UCL study affirmed this optimistic outlook in its research model, while offering a critical message to the overall crypto industry.

"Applying this model to six different PoS-based [distributed ledger technology] DLT systems confirms the hypothesis and shows that their energy consumption per transaction is indeed at least three orders of magnitude lower than that of Bitcoin," the study concluded. "These results can be understood as an urgent call for the modernization of PoW systems and a shift towards PoS, as well as a recommendation to practitioners to consider appropriate, energy-saving hardware."

In a still-nascent industry, of sorts, that purports to change essentially the entire world, perhaps it should have been anticipated that the industry itself was likely to be in for a few of its own changes.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Curran had no position in any security mentioned.

TAGS: Bitcoin | Investing | Stocks | Renewable energy | Cryptocurrency

More from Stocks

Disney Is Firming Up a Bit Ahead of Earnings

Bruce Kamich
Aug 8, 2022 8:36 AM EDT

The charts of the entertainment giant are modestly positive before it reports fiscal third-quarter results after Wednesday's close.

Momentum Technology Traders Have a Big Day Ahead This Week

Bob Byrne
Aug 8, 2022 8:30 AM EDT

Traders should be aware that there are a number of favorite tech plays that will be reporting results after Tuesday's close.

Hong Kong Cuts Quarantine to 3 Hotel-Stay Days

Alex Frew McMillan
Aug 8, 2022 8:15 AM EDT

With its economy in recession, Hong Kong is finally recognizing that it must 'live with Covid' like the rest of the world.

Upstart Holdings Isn't a Stock to Hold on the Cusp of Earnings

Bruce Kamich
Aug 8, 2022 7:59 AM EDT

The charts and indicators of the operator of a cloud-based artificial intelligence lending platform are largely bearish.

Bulls Control the Market Narrative for Now

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
Aug 8, 2022 7:43 AM EDT

However, the July Consumer Price Index report later this week could change things.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 09:24 AM EDT PETER TCHIR

    Jobs Report Reaction: Incredibly Strong, But Questions to Ask

    An incredibly strong July jobs report. Not only d...
  • 08:54 AM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    The Secret to Dealing With FOMO
  • 03:51 PM EDT REAL MONEY

    AMD Second-Quarter Earnings Live Blog

    Real Money's Eric Jhonsa covers 's second-quarte...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2022 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login