• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Doug Kass
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Jim Cramer
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Stocks

As Iran Conflict Brews, Set Sights on Raytheon and Northrop Grumman

While perhaps not good long-term holds at these prices, Raytheon and Northrop Grumman may be good trades.
By JIM COLLINS
Jun 24, 2019 | 09:00 AM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: XAR, NOC, RTN, AVAV, KTOS, FLIR, INTC

As tensions rise in the Persian Gulf, several defense stocks may play to the current climate. To spot them, however, the first task is to determine the relative strength of the group, or, to use a relevant analogy -- see them from the view from 30,000 feet.

The S&P Select SPDR for Aerospace and Defense  (XAR)  has been on a tear this year, posting a 30.93% gain. The year-to-date figures use the base of a market that had crashed in December, so it can be somewhat misleading. But the one-year performance of XAR, an 18.88% gain, tells no lies. This sector is decidedly in favor, and thus it is unrealistic to expect to find hidden gems here.

But could an escalation between the U.S. and Iran into an actual shooting war rev this group up even further? Of course, and that's the move that traders want to consider.

Moving from the general to the specific, the U.S. drone that was allegedly downed by Iran Thursday over the Strait of Hormuz was an RQ-4A Global Hawk, manufactured by Northrop Grumman (NOC) . This drone reportedly carries an astronomical cost to the Department of Defense of $222 million per unit.

That said, the capabilities of this particular Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) are astounding, and the future of warfare is in unmanned smart equipment. I believe the "smartness" will come from the sensor systems, which in the case of the RQ-4A are produced by Raytheon  (RTN) .

So, while my knowledge of aerial combat ranges only as far as repeated viewings of "Top Gun," I think Raytheon might be a better trade on UAVs than Northrop Grumman.

Also, remember that war-fighting requires high-spec equipment that has been vetted by national defense agencies over decades. Smaller UAV companies like AeroVironment (AVAV) and Kratos Defense & Security Solutions (KTOS) certainly have intriguing niches, but they just can't compete for contracts for UAVs that would power a conflict between military superpowers like the U.S. and Iran.

Not to be a swords-into-plowshares kind of guy, but reading about the enormous sensing and imaging technology that is included in the Global Hawk's payload made me think about another societal problem. Yes, I went back to my old days as a sell-side auto analyst, and asked, Why isn't this military technology being applied to self-driving cars, otherwise known as AVs?

Raytheon worked with Cadillac on a primitive thermal-imaging system called "Night Vision" that was introduced in 2000, but the company doesn't feature in any of my conversations with auto and tech executives on the future of AVs, nor does Northrop Grumman. It seems that the defense giants are ceding the market for imaging for AVs to companies such as FLIR Systems (FLIR) and Intel's (INTC) MobilEye.

So, the ability to move from a very niche market -- there are fewer than 100 Global Hawks actively deployed around the world -- to the more general market -- there are more than 1 billion cars on the road around the globe -- is just not there for defense contractors.

Government agencies are just so darn picky about intellectual property concerns. So, I don't consider either Northrop or Raytheon, which are trading at highs, as buy-and-holds. I don't own either name now. As we have learned this June, though, any stock can always go higher, and RTN and NOC are good conflict plays. In this incredibly toppy market, however, investors should not confuse trading opportunities with long-term holds.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time publication, Jim Collins had no position on the securities mentioned.

TAGS: Investing | Politics | Stocks | Airlines | Defense | Middle East

More from Stocks

Price Targets: How They Mislead and How They Can be Used

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
Jan 23, 2021 10:00 AM EST

The main problem with price targets is that they are a static number in a dynamic situation.

Stock Market Continues to Defy Conventional Wisdom

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
Jan 22, 2021 5:04 PM EST

Concerns about the action being overheated remain, but rotational action keeps the momentum going.

AMC Is a High Risk, High Reward Play

Timothy Collins
Jan 22, 2021 2:15 PM EST

Short and sweet: This is based on the high running emotions of the markets. There's little to it beyond that.

GoodRx Needs a Shot in the Arm to Improve Its Outlook

Bruce Kamich
Jan 22, 2021 2:03 PM EST

IPOs in recent months have done extremely well -- not so GDRX.

GameStop and the Dangerous Game of Gamma Squeezes

Timothy Collins
Jan 22, 2021 1:26 PM EST

What happened after Citron Research posted a video about GameStop is very troubling.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 11:01 AM EST JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    I discuss price targets in my Saturday column.
  • 07:54 AM EST GARY BERMAN

    Friday Morning Fibocall for 1/22/2021

    SPX (Long-Term View) The 1/21/21 NEW high @ 3861...
  • 11:16 AM EST CHRIS VERSACE

    Worst Stocks to Buy for the Biden Presidency

    Biden's take on the minimum wage, likely moves on ...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2021 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login