• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Doug Kass
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Jim Cramer
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Stocks

A Review of Judge Nathan's Positions as Elon Musk's Contempt Hearing Kicks Off

Tesla's CEO is encountering an experienced jurist on Thursday.
By KEVIN CURRAN Apr 04, 2019 | 03:02 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: TWTR, TSLA, LYFT, SPOT

As Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk's hearing is expected to kick off at 2 p.m. in the Southern District of Manhattan, it is worth considering the woman holding his fate in her hands: Judge Alison Nathan.

Nathan has been on the bench in New York since 2011, after being appointed by President Obama amidst Republican protest.

Prior to donning the robes, she began her career as a law clerk in the office of former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens before embarking on a career at a private practice and becoming a well respected law professor in New York at such prestigious institutions as Fordham University Law School and NYU Law.

Re-entering the public sphere, she acted as special counsel to the solicitor general of New York and associate White House counsel and special assistant to President Obama just prior to being appointed.

In short, Musk is not dealing with a "green" judge.

If found guilty, Musk could have serious fines levied on him or see his beloved Twitter (TWTR) taken away. He could even be removed from his perch atop the automaker in what would likely be the most extreme punishment.

With such massive implications, it might be dutiful to review her recent cases to assess her temperament and judgment as a jurist.

Yellow Taxis v. Uber, Lyft

Apropos of recent stock news, one of Nathan's notable recent decisions involves ride-sharing options Uber and Lyft (LYFT) .

In a suit brought by yellow taxi medallion holders, Nathan ruled in favor of the ride-sharing operations on the basis that the two operate differentiated business models.

"The City's for-hire ground transportation industry - like its analogues in other parts of the country and the world - may well, as Plaintiffs allege, be rapidly evolving. And a notable feature of that evolution may indeed be that the Ubers and Lyfts of the world increasingly share important characteristics with traditional medallion taxicabs, including, as identified by Plaintiffs, the customers they serve, the drivers they employ, the manner in which they transact sales, and even the immediacy with which their services are delivered," she acknowledged in her decision. "But marshaling such similarities risks obscuring persistent (and undisputed) differences in the manner in which these industry participants interact with and relate to their consumers."

She cited the "spontaneous street hails" of the yellow cab industry as a key contrast with Uber and Lyft's app-driven services.

"Such differences, easily "justify" Defendants' decision to subject these participants to "differential" regulatory treatment on the basis of legitimate government policy to serve the sorts of interests discussed above," she said. "Under the deferential standards of rational basis review, nothing more is required for the challenged regulations to survive."

The implication is certainly favorable toward new age business models like Tesla's. What it means for a specific case like Elon's remains a stretch.

Ferrick v. Spotify

In another tech darling case, Judge Nathan ruled in favor of Spotify (SPOT) after a class action suit was brought against the company for not fairly compensating musicians and publishers.

The suit alleged that $43 million proposed to settle a suit for infringement on the artists and music executives was wholly insufficient for the Stockholm-based streaming service to atone for its infractions.

"The Settlement Agreement is procedurally and substantively unfair to Settlement Class Members because it prevents meaningful participation by rights holders and offers them an unfair dollar amount in light of Spotify's ongoing, willful copyright infringement of their works," a statement from a consortium of artists led by Wixen Music Publishing decried in the 2017 case.

The suit instead pursued a hefty $1.6 billion settlement ahead of Spotify's blockbuster IPO.

However, again Nathan sided with the industry upstart, citing the impracticability of the plaintiff's requests.

"The combination of the immediate and future monetary relief, along with the non-monetary benefits provided, constitutes a significant recovery," Nathan wrote in her opinion. "Ultimately, the Court is persuaded that determining how many infringements occurred or defining the exact size of the class at this stage would undermine the benefit of the settlement in reducing litigation burden. As noted, if Plaintiffs proceeded with litigation, it is far from clear that they would have been able to establish liability or damages - or damages as significant as the recovery established in the settlement."

Additionally, she noted that the group's decision to opt out of a settlement disqualified them from challenging the decision further, marking a big win for Spotify.

Again, not the greatest analogy to Musk, but it does again speak to Nathan's experience with high-profile cases, focused on much-discussed stocks.

SEC v. Anvil Partners, Inc.

Likely less high profile, but more pertinent to Elon Musk's case was Judge Nathan's ruling in the case of the Securities Exchange Commission v. Anvil Partners.

The judge ruled in late 2017 that the Buffalo, New York-based registered investment adviser Anvil Partners and its owner, president, and chief investment officer, Jeremy Beck, to be in civil contempt of court for not complying with the court's order enforcing a previously issued SEC investigative subpoena.

The case examined whether or not the firm inflated its assets under management in public filings, which subsequently came under subpoena. After failing to comply with the SEC's subpoena, Nathan ruled the firm in contempt of court and ordered Beck arrested and assigned hefty fines to the firm in early 2018.

Not the most heartening precedent for Elon.

SEC v. Benjamin Wey

In another SEC-involved case, Judge Nathan was more sympathetic to the defendant due to mitigating circumstances.

In a case against Chinese-American private equity tycoon Benjamin Wey, head of New York Global Group, the commission alleged that Wey typically structured reverse mergers between clients and publicly traded shell companies in such a way that he and other family members secretly obtained ownership interests of more than five percent of the newly listed companies.

It also alleged that he intentionally evaded regulation by hiding proceeds offshore, thus generating millions in illegal and untaxed profits.

Wey also had criminal charges brought against hm by the U.S. Department of Justice based on the actions.

Nathan ultimately ruled that prosecutors' case was built on overly broad and unconstitutional searches and dismissed the case, calling the searches "grossly negligent."

At the very least, she is not unfailingly sympathetic to the Feds in antifraud cases, such as the one in front of her with Musk.

How she decides in this case will be one to watch, but it certainly isn't her first rodeo and her leanings based on her relatively balanced decision history are far from certain.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

Employees of TheStreet are restricted from trading individual securities.

TAGS: Law | Litigation | Investing | Junk Bonds | Stocks | Automotive | Technology | U.S. Equity | Stock of the Day | Elon Musk

More from Stocks

Navigating a Market Correction

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
Feb 27, 2021 10:00 AM EST

The most critical factor in long-term market success is the ability to effectively navigate market corrections.

Corrective Action Produces Fading Confidence and Technical Damage

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
Feb 26, 2021 5:08 PM EST

It's dangerous to have too much exposure now, but the potential for a good recovery is there once interest rate issues are digested.

I'm Intrigued by the Recent Pullback in Aurora Mobile

Timothy Collins
Feb 26, 2021 3:30 PM EST

While the Chinese company is still not profitable, it is cash flow positive.

Salesforce Gets a Quant Downgrade on Top of Weakening Charts

Bruce Kamich
Feb 26, 2021 12:50 PM EST

Here's what investors and traders need to think about.

My Preference Right Now Is to Buy Pre-Deals

Timothy Collins
Feb 26, 2021 12:36 PM EST

I've added a few names that I see as a great risk-reward because of the limited downside.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 11:32 AM EST JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    Navigating a Market Correction
  • 11:29 AM EST GARY BERMAN

    Where Does the Nasdaq Go From Here?

    Where does the Nasdaq Composite (CCMP) index go fr...
  • 12:31 PM EST GARY BERMAN

    Has the Short-Term Top Come for the XLF/Banks?

    The has triggered a long-term overbought signal ...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2021 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login