• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Doug Kass
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Jim Cramer
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing

Jim Cramer: What Matters After Today Is Earnings

A trade deal with China could certainly help as well.
By JIM CRAMER
Jan 03, 2019 | 03:55 PM EST
Stocks quotes in this article: AAPL, SBUX, NKE, AAL, DAL, MAR, HLT, CLX, PEP, KO

It's the economy, stupid. Or it's Apple (AAPL) stupid. We don't know which to finger.

And that's why everything went down today. Because in an environment where one of the largest companies on Earth reports a dramatic shortfall you have to leave no stone unturned to find out what the heck is going on. The problem is that when we turn over stones we keep finding poisonous nematodes and that's not exactly what makes for a good environment to own stocks.

Let's start with Apple and try, for a moment to be dispassionate about it. Apple pre-announced in large part because of China. It's funny, Apple expects to set all-time revenue records in United States, Canada, Germany, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands and Korea. By the way, if anyone cares, Apple will have an all-time record revenue for the U.S.

But China was weak and there are now two camps out there about Apple. One is that it lacks innovation and its iPhones cost too much money. The other says that the issue is China itself, and we aren't sure why, everything from a weaker Chinese economy to, I surmise, the possibility that the Chinese want to buy Chinese just as there are now plenty of people in this country who want to buy American and NOT Chinese. It doesn't matter whether the Chinese are making the product here or not, our president has gotten the country turned against China after years of China pretty much abusing us across the board, especially with bogus joint ventures and intellectual property theft.

There has to be such a thing as China pride aided by a belief that the Communist dictatorship may be watching your every move. In that case I would select Huawei phones over Apple phones any day of the week, even though Apple is a huge employer in China. Today's long-knives-are-out for Apple narrative says that cheaper phones are in vogue and Apple can't charge as much as it does. I rebel and say it is much more complicated than that.

So let's parse all of this out. If there really is no innovation in Apple land why is Apple crushing it in so many countries, and I am not even talking about wearables which are up 50% with the watch being constrained. If the ecosystem is dying, another thought put out there, then how did Srvices do $10.8 billion?

So where do I come out?

I think that China's Apple sales are weak by both design and by circumstance. The circumstance being a country that was once thought to be invincible that is now slowing down and it is slowing down because we are fighting back by recognizing there is more to China than a market for some companies to sell goods while others, mostly domestic, get crushed by them.

Which brings me to the bigger issue. When you combine the weakness in China with the U.S. PMI that's showing the worst plunge since that benchmark of all bad, 2008, you get a picture of utter weakness across the board.

That's producing bond yields that are defying anything that I have ever seen -- 2.5% when full employment should be giving us 3.5% minimum on the 10-Year.

So what should happen right now? In an alternative universe the Fed should be meeting to discuss whether the U.S. economy needs to have one cut or two cuts in 2019 now that the economic cycle peaked at the beginning of October of 2018.

Yep, that's when it all started going down hill from commodities like oil to factory orders to high-end retail sales to housing data.

There's only one problem. At the exact moment we were getting peak data we hear from Fed Chairman Jay Powell that the economy was accelerating at such a clip that maybe three hikes are necessary after the December Fed Funds boost.

I was apoplectic when I heard that because the data I was looking at, and I have gone over the indicators endlessly, no need to do it again, showed that we were on the verge of a slowdown that would take us back to other stressful periods that knocked stocks down 20% or more, the fabled bear.

Now we have the weakness I was looking for and what's the policy response? The Fed has to put through two hikes not three.

So you know what that means? It means that the Fed for all of its alleged policies and models is really only targeting one thing: job losses. It needs unemployment to go back to 5% because its models show that you don't need to raise interest rates anymore.

I am going to repeat that. Despite what you hear, despite what people say about the sainted Fed, it ain't stopping until the unemployment rate jumps and people are losing jobs all over the place. That's the win. That's the big W. They get lots of people thrown out of work and then their work might be done.

I emphasize might because if they are bone-headed enough not to adopt my "one and wait" prudent philosophy maybe they need unemployment to rise to 5.5%. That might be an even bigger win for these rich people who probably know no poverty and can't figure out what's so bad about it.

You know what's a byproduct of the "real goal" as I like to call it? What happened to Apple today: earnings shortfalls. International companies could be felled by China, with only some spared, like Starbucks (SBUX) and Nike (NKE) , at least for now. I think if the Chinese made real good sneakers than Nike could have a crummy next quarter, too. Starbucks hasn't been targeted that I can tell. Who knows, though, what's next.

Domestically? It's a Fed field day. We have layoffs galore in the energy patch where there are crashes in oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids. We have a slowdown in construction because of higher interest rates even and the possibility that some community banks may not be able to raise capital because they would be paying too much interest to get it. We have hideous auto numbers and housing numbers but the Fed hasn't even considered those companies. And we now have what I think will be some very big retail layoffs, particularly at the mall.

They must be so happy at the Fed. Just a couple more tightenings and its nirvana on ice!

As a stock picker I have to say that they've made it more difficult to make money. You have a collapse in oil, so do you reach for the airlines? Nope because the slowdown has already cut into their earnings. American (AAL) and Delta (DAL) just hit 52-week lows for heaven's sake. Do you go with travel and leisure because of the lower price of gasoline. You kidding me? You don't buy those stocks when the economy is slowing. That's why Marriott (MAR) and Hilton (HLT) have seen their stocks get annihilated today,.

So what do you do? You buy the stocks that do well in a recession that are bolstered by lower raw costs. They are the safe stocks. That's what's worth owning. Clorox (CLX) . Pepsico (PEP) , Coca Cola (KO) . You get the picture. If you can drink it or wash with it, Jay Powell just gave you a winner.

Is there a way out of this box? I think a trade deal sure could help. I do believe one can be obtained.

But let's save that for a later date. What matters after today is earnings and how bad the shortfalls will be. From the looks of Apple? Pretty bad. And that's worth considering as we go into the season that's not so jolly anyway.

 
 
 
Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

Jim Cramer and the AAP team hold a position in Apple for their Action Alerts PLUS Charitable Trust Portfolio . Want to be alerted before Cramer buys or sells AAPL? Learn more now.

TAGS: Investing |

More from Investing

Marveling at the Market's Move? It's All About Momentum

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
Jan 19, 2021 4:41 PM EST

No news can explain the action -- whether the bears believe it or not.

Surface Oncology Is Set for Further Gains - How to Buy It

Bruce Kamich
Jan 19, 2021 3:25 PM EST

Here's our price objective.

My Preference With OneSpan Is Calls So I Can Define My Risk

Timothy Collins
Jan 19, 2021 2:36 PM EST

The last few post-earnings beat downs were greeted with optimism once traders got over the initial disappointment.

A Top Biotechnology Play for 2021

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
Jan 19, 2021 2:07 PM EST

Forte's sole clinic candidate is FB-401 for the treatment of atopic dermatitis, which is the scientific name for eczema.

Boot Barn Gets a Quant Upgrade: Do the Charts Fit?

Bruce Kamich
Jan 19, 2021 1:53 PM EST

Here's our latest analysis and trading strategy for the shares.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 11:09 AM EST GARY BERMAN

    Is Copper About to Turn to Rust?

    Below is a very long-term copper chart.  As you...
  • 08:02 AM EST GARY BERMAN

    Tuesday Morning Fibocall for for 1/19/2021

    SPX (Long-Term View) The 1/8/21 high @ 3826.69 i...
  • 09:01 AM EST JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    When it's time to sell, will you act or freeze?
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2021 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login