• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Energy

Lessons Learned in 2012

How understanding three unexpected  events in the energy sector experienced in 2012 can make you a better investor in 2013.
By GLENN WILLIAMS Dec 31, 2012 | 03:30 PM EST
Stocks quotes in this article: ED, FE, PEG, POM, NU, DUK, EXC

In 2012, the energy sector experienced three unexpected events. Understanding these events can help investors join me in learning new lessons so we all can become wiser going forward.

Lesson 1: The Worst Case Scenario Is Possible

Hurricane Sandy was not only horrible for families and businesses; it was also the worst-case scenario for gas and electric utilities. Gas and electric distribution systems were destroyed. Repair and replacement costs are still unknown, but the final tally will reach historic levels.

Compared to transmission systems, distribution systems owned by local utilities including Consolidated Edison (ED), First Energy (FE), Public Service Enterprise Group (PEG), Pepco Holdings (POM) and Northeast Utilities (NU), are small, fragile and prone to outages. Natural events, such as Hurricane Sandy and June's derecho (a widespread , sustained wind storm), will destroy distribution systems, causing agony for millions of families and businesses.

Most electric distribution is overhead and gas systems are buried underground. In Sandy and the derecho, electric systems were damaged while most gas systems were left unaffected. This leads many to conclude that electric systems should be buried like natural gas systems are.

But burying electric systems could be a costly mistake. Flooding was the root cause of Sandy's power blackouts. Water and electricity do not mix. Burying distribution lines in areas prone to flooding makes matters worse, not better. Underground systems in flooded area could actually take longer and cost more to fix than above ground systems.

A lesson learned from the worst-case scenarios is not to simply bury infrastructure but to invest in smart grids and redundant delivery systems. Smart grids isolate problems, limit the affected area, dispatch crews and attempt to self-repair. The question remains if ratepayers are willing to pay the price. In suburban and rural areas, most are unwilling.

Lesson 2: It Takes a Village to Destroy a Great Company

Duke Energy's (DUK) management team sold investors and state regulators about the benefits of acquiring their neighbor, Progress Energy. They claimed the benefits would help consumers and shareholders by streamlining costs and avoiding unnecessary duplication. It would also make Duke the nation's largest utility and provided Duke's management team with unprecedented economic and political power.

The merger was also a poke in Washington's eye. The national trend was to deregulate and restructure local distribution companies. This included expanding Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs) and moving more power plants into the free markets. This had the effect of reducing utilities' influence over regional economic and political decision-making.

Duke took the other path. They and their state regulators wanted nothing to do with federally regulated RTOs. They wanted power plants regulated and they were fine with utilities having influence in regional decision-making.

But Duke's management team and its old board of directors overreached. They saw Duke as their own private club, not the shareholders' company. They believed they were bigger than the states regulating them; they thought they could do as they pleased. They were wrong.

By the close of 2012, the states won and the old management team lost. Duke's CEO and his top executives either left or they will be forced to leave. Duke's old board of directors was told by the state how to govern. The state not only stepped in to protected consumers, they also protected the company's shareholders.

It took a team to mess up a great merger. It will take time before shareholders will see all the benefits of this merger and alternative energy policy.

Lesson 3: Free Markets Can Harm Generating Companies

On the opposite side of the spectrum is Exelon (EXC). This company also undertook a huge merger by acquiring Constellation Energy Group. The management team also sold their shareholders about the benefits of the merger. But they took a big gamble with shareholders' money and they lost.

Before the merger, Exelon owned the nation's largest merchant fleet of nuclear power plants. Post-merger, they owned even a larger fleet. But unlike Duke's case, most of Exelon's generating revenues are dependent on the power markets. In 2012, those markets fell.

The economy wasn't the only reason power markets to fall. Savvy consumers learned to use new conservation technologies. Other consumers installed distributed energy systems. Utilities saw a net drop in nationwide consumption. With lower consumption came lower prices.

The interesting aspect of power markets is they are technology agnostic. Power markets don't care how power is produced; all they care about supplies and demand.

Exelon is not alone. All merchant plants, including wind, solar, and coal-fired power plants, depend on the markets and they are experiencing lower margins.

With lower market prices, it is difficult to see why anyone will build new generation without government assistance. Small wind and solar are possible, but capital-intensive generators seem unlikely.

Looking Forward to 2013

Learn from these lessons. Fundamentals matter. Companies do not run themselves. Leadership counts. Invest wisely. Most importantly, have a healthily and prosperous New Year.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Glenn Williams had no position in any of the stocks mentioned.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Energy

More from Energy

See That Down the Road? It's the Big 'Green' Bubble, Ready to Pop

Jim Collins
Jun 24, 2022 1:30 PM EDT

Environmental, social, and corporate governance has created a monster and gullible investors should hit the brakes on their EVs and run from the Washington technocrats while they have the chance.

Weber's Rally Was Cooked Up By the Shorts and Something I Experienced First Hand

Jonathan Heller
Jun 24, 2022 10:00 AM EDT

It should be an interesting ride from here.

Will This Year's Energy and Commodity Trades Become Last Year's Tumbling Tech?

Helene Meisler
Jun 24, 2022 6:00 AM EDT

I can't remember the last time anyone asked me about Apple. No one cares.

Here's What You Need to Know About Investing in Energy

Jim Collins
Jun 23, 2022 1:00 PM EDT

The rudderlessness in DC has created an environment that's downright hostile to domestic exploitation of hydrocarbons.

Occidental Petroleum Could See Its Charts Improve as Buffett Ups His Stake

Bruce Kamich
Jun 23, 2022 8:03 AM EDT

The stock of the oil giant has been sliding of late but should receive a boost as the Oracle of Omaha buys more Oxy shares.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 08:55 AM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    The 10 personality traits of successful traders an...
  • 12:08 PM EDT STEPHEN GUILFOYLE

    Stocks Under $10

    As a Portfolio Name Agrees to a Merger, Here's Our...
  • 10:44 AM EDT PAUL PRICE

    My Very Best Pick for the Next 12 Months

    American Woodmark . It rarely gets better than th...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2022 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login