• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • TheStreet Smarts
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Financial Services

Jim Cramer: Trim, but Don't Abandon, Surging Bank Stocks

Unlike so many other groups where valuations are stretched, the bank group appears to have room to run under a different government regime.
By JIM CRAMER Nov 30, 2017 Updated Nov 30, 2017 | 08:22 AM EST
Stocks quotes in this article: C, XLF, GS, BAC, JPM

I despise parabolic moves in anything, whether it be bitcoin, or tulips, or the Nasdaq, or oil, or blockchain, for that matter.

I particularly don't like parabolic jumps, the kind with the huge slopes up, when it comes to slower-growing groups because that just cries out "unsustainable."

Yet that's exactly what has been happening with the bank stocks over the last few days -- parabolic moves that can't be justified by the fundamentals.

So, do you need to sell the banks? Do you need to trim them?

The most imperative dictum in stock investing is much like the ultimate imperative for a doctor -- first, do no harm, which I always have translated, loosely I admit, into, "No one ever got hurt taking a profit." Our Action Alerts PLUS portfolio sold some Citigroup Inc. (C) yesterday when it was $75 and change simply because we were up so much that I felt piggish. Bulls make money, bears make money, but hogs get slaughtered. These rules do not get repealed during a romp like the bank stocks are having. It's the opposite; they are embossed on my forehead like the yellow Post-it note we used to wear in that exact spot if we screwed up. 

I can imagine Karen Cramer taping a Post-it to my forehead saying, "I didn't take profits in Citi when I had them and I deserve nothing less than total contempt." Thank heaven those Post-its were never stapled, but they can make for awkward stares when she would make me walk outside to get her a fresh hot pretzel. It's all in "Confessions of a Street Addict," if you really care.

Anyway, when I look at these bank stocks I know they can't keep going up with this velocity. More important to ask, though, is, "Where should they be valued?" Are they galloping to where they ultimately are going to trade, or is this just an outlier move that can be repealed when earnings are reported seven weeks from now?

That's really the questions, and it's a lot harder to answer because the group is controlled by the Fianncial Select Sector SPDR (XLF) , the ETF that traders use to blast in and out of the sector. It most certainly is the tiny tail that wags the big dog, an ETF with a capitalization that isn't even a tenth of the largest bank stock in it, that of JP Morgan Chase & Co (JPM) .

The homogenization makes for some rather difficult judgments for a group that's considered pretty much of a commodity controlled by the Fed and its short-rate tool for stimulating or cooling the economy.

Of course, the homogenization makes no sense because some of these stocks are dramatically undervalued on certain metrics -- Citigroup on tangible book, which is barely below the current stock price; Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) , which is two multiple turns below its average from before the Great Recession; and Bank of America Corp. (BAC) , which has a higher price-to-earnings ratio than most, but its earnings have been depressed by so many different restrictions put on it by the Fed.

Now, if you ask me where the XLF should be, I can justify at least another 5% move, conservatively, based on the belief that we could get four hikes within the next year, including a December bump-up. That's about a concomitant increase to the revenues that come from these hikes, with Bank of America being the biggest beneficiary because it has the largest deposit base.

Bank of America's stock is the most interesting object lesson here. It sells at 15 times earnings versus an average of about 12 times in the years before the Great Recession, so it seems classically overvalued. But when the Fed takes the rates up, the bank will take your borrowing rate up but not move up your CD rates anywhere near commensurately with the Fed's moves. No lockstep here.

Now consider some history. Bank of America's stock traded at $54 back in 2006 before the crash. It has about 4.4 billion shares outstanding. Now it has 10.4 billion. It paid out $2.40 in dividends going into the Great Recession. It currently gives you 35 cents, which is up nicely from 12 cents in 2014 but way below what it has the capacity to pay even with the explosion in its share count.

Here's the hard part: The XLF will make this stock trade with JPMorgan, which is far more expensive, and with Goldman Sachs, which is now historically incredibly cheap versus the crash. But I could easily argue that if you strip the regulations that were piled on during the President Obama era, the earnings power goes up much more than people realize and so does the buyback and the dividend. So it is very difficult to argue that Bank of America is expensive. I can extract different ratios for different bank stocks, but all come out the same except for JP Morgan. They are too cheap to worry about versus both before the deregulation era began under Trump and before the Great Recession.

My conclusion: You can trim them, but unlike so many other areas where stock valuations are historically stretched, a look at this group says you have room to run, maybe much more room to run now that the sector is out from under a punitive regime by a different, and I mean really different, government.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

Action Alerts PLUS, which Jim Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust, is long C.

TAGS: U.S. Equity | Financial Services | How-to | Markets | Risk Management | Stocks | Investing

More from Financial Services

American Express: Leave Home Without It

Bruce Kamich
Oct 3, 2023 1:55 PM EDT

The charts show further declines ahead for the credit card company.

AllianceBernstein: The Window Is Open for a Recovery Rally

Bruce Kamich
Oct 3, 2023 8:02 AM EDT

Let's check the charts and indicators.

Trading Coinbase Is More Than Just a Flip of the Coin

Bruce Kamich
Oct 2, 2023 1:30 PM EDT

The stock rallied early Monday, but those gains are fading.

This Company Grows Like a Tech Stock, but Is Bargain-Priced

Paul Price
Sep 29, 2023 7:00 AM EDT

Let's see why Axos Financial is an excellent play.

Doug Kass: My Real Money Pal Just Picked Berkshire for Q4. I Disagree

Doug Kass
Sep 25, 2023 2:34 PM EDT

Here's why I'm shorting the very stock that Stephen 'Sarge' Guilfoyle picked as his stock for the remainder of the year.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 12:13 PM EDT BRUCE KAMICH

    8 Trading Rules from T. T. Hoyne

    You just read the header for this missive and prob...
  • 08:42 AM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    How Elite Traders Make Big Profits
  • 02:58 PM EDT BRUCE KAMICH

    Classic Trading Rules From Bernard Baruch

    Bernard Baruch listed the rules (below) in his aut...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2023 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login