• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Doug Kass
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Jim Cramer
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing

When to Ignore the Insiders

Here's a prime example of why insider buying shouldn't be followed blindly.
By MEENA KRISHNAMSETTY Nov 29, 2012 | 10:00 AM EST
Stocks quotes in this article: SEE

On Tuesday, Sealed Air (SEE) board member Kenneth Manning bought 5,000 shares of the company's stock at an average price of $17 per share. Sealed Air is a company with $3.3 billion in market capitalization that makes food and protective packaging products (such as bubble wrap). Before this latest share purchase, his last one -- according to our database of 13-F filings -- came in November of 2011 at an average price of $17.44.

Manning had bought other shares that year at even higher prices, so overall he doesn't seem to have a good track record here. On average, stocks bought by insiders tend to outperform the broader market, but this isn't always the case, so we at least like to look quickly at how a particular insider's trades have performed in the past. With his latest purchase, Manning owns just over 100,000 shares of Sealed Air's stock.

In the third quarter, Sealed Air's revenue climbed 53% year over year. However, all of this growth came from the company's October 2011 acquisition of Diversey, a company that makes cleaning and hygiene products. If we leave out the results from that segment, sales were down 4%. Sealed Air also recorded a large impairment to goodwill from the takeout, which drove a large net loss. Without the goodwill impairment, operating income was 10% higher year over year -- but, again, that includes the results from Diversey, so it doesn't necessarily reflect much of an improvement at the company. We'd also note that share count is up close to 10% in the last year. In addition, cash flow from operations in the first nine months of 2012 was down significantly from the same period last year.

The stock price has dropped 3% year to date against a rising market, which has placed Sealed Air at a market capitalization of $3.3 billion. Wall Street analysts expect earnings of $1.29 per share for 2013, which implies a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 13x. We're not sure we would be that optimistic: Even stripping out the goodwill impairment, operating income does not compare particularly well with that of a year earlier, and interest expenses are up strongly.

Last quarter, Sealed Air's earnings before taxes came to about $50 million, or about $0.26 per share. That's roughly $1 per year annualized, pretax. In order for the roughly $17 stock price to make sense, we think the company would need to start growing its business organically or significantly reduce expenses. We'd also note that Sealed Air has a history of underperforming analyst targets: It has delivered a negative surprise in adjusted earnings each of the last four fiscal quarters, and in two of those cases the miss has been by greater than 40%. With that performance history, we'd be skeptical of the sell side's current earnings projections.

It seems to us that Sealed Air would need to start doing a number of things right in order to prove that the stock is undervalued at the current price. More likely, we feel, is that the shares will muddle through for the next few years with little change in its revenue and earnings -- or even decreases, perhaps. In this scenario, it wouldn't represent a good value.

It's possible management could actually deliver better earnings numbers, which would then lead to a substantial upside for the company, and that seems to be what Manning expects here. However, his purchases historically haven't performed well. We think that investors can likely find better values in the market, and so we would avoid the stock.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Krishnamsetty and co-writer Matt Doiron had no positions in the stocks mentioned.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity

More from Investing

I Got the 'SOS', So Here's My Take on the Stock's Saga

Timothy Collins
Feb 28, 2021 6:35 PM EST

Let's try to sort out the details of the complicated story of SOS Ltd. -- and why the short reports might be ... selling you short.

Bearish Bets: 2 Nasdaq Stocks You Should Consider Shorting This Week

Bob Lang
Feb 28, 2021 10:30 AM EST

These names are displaying both quantitative and technical deterioration.

Jim Cramer: What History Tells Us About Bond-Rate Scares Like This

Jim Cramer
Feb 27, 2021 2:01 PM EST

We could have some real pain ahead for some stocks. Five different kinds.

What's Next for Bonds, TLT and Interest Rates?

Bruce Kamich
Feb 27, 2021 12:30 PM EST

Thoughts and observations on Treasuries and the direction of interest rates.

Navigating a Market Correction

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
Feb 27, 2021 10:00 AM EST

The most critical factor in long-term market success is the ability to effectively navigate market corrections.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 11:51 AM EST REAL MONEY

    Watch Bob Lang and Doug Kass Discuss Short-Selling!

    Bob Lang and Doug Kass with an engaging and educat...
  • 11:32 AM EST JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    Navigating a Market Correction
  • 11:29 AM EST GARY BERMAN

    Where Does the Nasdaq Go From Here?

    Where does the Nasdaq Composite (CCMP) index go fr...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2021 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login