• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Technology

Cramer: When They Are Down, Memory Stocks May Be Must-Buys

I think the growth in DRAM and Flash is more secular in nature this time.
By JIM CRAMER Nov 28, 2017 | 06:11 AM EST
Stocks quotes in this article: AMZN, TSLA, GM, MU, WDC, STX, AMAT, LRCX

Calling the top on anything is rough stuff. We have seen top calling in so many places at so many times in the last few years, that it becomes commonplace, noteworthy even if it is wrong. One look at Tuesday's robust housing number, as well as the recent auto figures, tell you that the long-called peak housing and auto theses have not played out.

Sure, you could argue the auto stocks haven't made you much money since the top-calling began in earnest. But General Motors (GM) has stirred, and the original equipment parts suppliers have seen their stocks roar.

We have endless top-calling in Amazon (AMZN) -- all for naught, given how the company's stock seems to be headed to $2000. Tesla's (TSLA) stock never collapsed as so many top callers demand to happen. Failure to comply with the conventions of financial metrics, Elon Musk style.

And then there's DRAMs and Flash memory prices, the subject of which caused some very real consternation among complacent owners after the highly accurate, very rigorous Katy Huberty, the doyenne of tech, on Monday called a top in flash pricing, rocking the group. Shareholders in stocks like Micron (MU) , Western Digital (WDC) and Seagate (STX) , Applied Materials (AMAT) and Lam Research (LRCX) among them, must all understand the dynamic that's now playing out before you pull the trigger.

Flash and Drams are two commodities -- although the makers of both of them would beg to differ --that frequently give you boom-bust moves of breathtaking proportions. The upside comes from a surge in demand without a concomitant increase in stock price, as canny investors suspect there is too much capacity coming on. Then, when demand exceeds supply long enough, the producers all gear up for new lines to grab the excess margin.

Most Wall Street analysts believe these competitors can put plants up fast enough to capture that marginal dollar without a peak developing. But they are always wary that we might have reached that tipping level. The companies themselves have been much more worried about trying to meet skyrocketing demand for every trickier-to-build device than they are about restraint on expanding their own product lines. That's what happens when a tidal wave of new devices, which tend to need storage, short and long term, cloud or no cloud hits a very small industry.

It's always hard to gauge when or even if that demand top is upon us, because near the top the clients all hedge their positions and take down excess inventory. This is the phenomenon known as double ordering, and it continues until you actually get what you want, and shortly before that prices tend to start going down, but they accelerate when the double orders evaporate.

Against the double-ordering threat is the lengthening cycle of building new supply, in part because, as I mentioned, these semiconductor equipment companies aren't stamping out auto parts. They are creating highly sophisticated devices that would never have been thought possible even a few years ago, as their complexities and size limitations make them incredibly difficult to build.

There have been many top callers in this cycle, in part because it's now been a couple of years of halcyon pricing, the usual half-life of these moves, and because the spending to build more machines is off the charts. It's just presumed that either situation will create a virtual crash of pricing, and that's why the stocks of Micron and Western Digital sell at such low price-to-earnings ratios, namely, around six times earnings for both.

Only the stock of General Motors rivals those feeble numbers. That's a sure sign that while Wall Street is exceedingly bullish, the investors and traders don't trust next year's numbers. Judging by the gap, it's almost as if they think earnings will be cut in half.

Now, in the most recent quarter DRAM pricing continued to accelerate without pause, despite a continual but disciplined amount of equipment spend. Not so with flash, which saw a slower rate of change of growth, dreaded because that bit of the second derivative, barring some glitch of complicated manufacturing, assures us of a top down the road.

Flash capacity spending is far exceeding DRAM spend this year, because of a perception that flash remains the storage of the future, even as both kinds of chips can play the role. But no one in the real world, where customers are worried about not meeting agreements, thinks about the stocks. They think about the prices and watch their profit margins shrink.

Management of all the companies in the supply chain are all on tenterhooks to see if those trends continue, as their revenues depend on the same calculus.

But here's the key distinguishing point: Micron has less on the line than Western Digital right now. That's because for most of the last decade, Micron has spent aggressively on building out and buying flash memory equipment makers to lessen dependence upon the historically more voluble DRAM component.

Western Digital hails from a disk drive world, which suffers from its own notorious boom-bust cycle; so wisely, last year it spent $16 billion on Sandisk, a company with a key partnership with flash maker Toshiba.

By this point, you have heard about the wrangling by Western Digital to buy the other half of its joint venture with Toshiba, in part because Toshiba's in such trouble related to nuclear power plant construction, for fire-sale prices. Toshiba doesn't recognize WDC's ownership, claiming its deal with Sandisk was relinquished if Sandisk were acquired.

The fight seems to have died down now, even with Toshiba making a deal with a different entry than Western Digital -- something WDC tried mightily to prevent from happening and still questions its legitimacy.

With Monday's gigantic selloff, the market's reflecting that Western Digital will now be more of a hard drive maker than investors thought, which means a lower-price-to-earnings multiple, given that flash had the highest place on the hierarchy.

If we get a real peak, Huberty writes, you could see a dramatic decline in pricing and a tag-a-long crushing of Western Digital's stock, but not Micron's because, ironically, DRAM pricing is still firming. It's ironic, because it was always thought to be DRAMs that collapsed first, not flash, because the former is more quickly and easily made, so capacity is easier to add.

Is the call right? I think it's a judgment based on a holistic approach matched with empirical evidence which yields a belief that the upside will be constrained anyway and the downside dangerous. I think that's a decent calculus.

Several months ago, at around the price shares of Western Digital traded coming into Monday's session, we called a top for Action Alerts PLUS club members as part of a rare trading strategy when we try to teach longer-term, research-based investing. Perhaps it is telling that as the price increases continued in the real world for WDC's wares, its stock price stalled out and didn't go higher -- although, had it got Toshiba's portion of the Sandisk partnership, it most certainly would.

I do believe that this cycle is different, though, because of the speed with which the data center must be built out to meet demand coming not just from e-commerce, but every single industry's internet of things trail. In that sense, I think the growth is more secular in nature, something that Lam Research CEO Martin Anstice and Applied Materials CEO Gary Dickerson have emphasized when they came on Mad Money.

In some ways, their theories are hard to argue with. If the amount of data is exploding, so will the devices needed to service them. That's what makes me suspicious of the peak call. How can you think that this time isn't different, given the step function thinking embraced by pretty much everybody?

Would that mean I would buy Western Digital if it fell back to the low $70s, where we first started to accumulate it? Yes, if pricing it stable; no, if it's going lower.

Either way, just remember that my thesis, the secular growth thesis, is really only embraced by the people who have the most at stake, the equipment producers, even as I think they know more and will be right. The group's stocks may no longer go up with great ferocity, but then again, when they are down, they may be must-buys.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust, has no positions in the stocks mentioned.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Technology | Markets | How-to | Jim Cramer | Risk Management | Stocks

More from Technology

Love Starts to Bloom in the Face of Recession

Ed Ponsi
Jul 7, 2022 10:30 AM EDT

The company behind a popular dating app begins to see its shares make a move, so to speak.

A Few Thoughts on What to Do With ARKK and QQQ

Bob Byrne
Jul 7, 2022 8:30 AM EDT

The latter shows a bit of relative strength, while the former looks to break above resistance.

Can You Spot a Rally Coming for Spotify?

Bruce Kamich
Jul 6, 2022 1:26 PM EDT

Let's see where investors can go long on SPOT, according to my read of the charts.

Household Names Easily Could Abound in Next Year's Portfolio of Big 2022 Losers

Jonathan Heller
Jul 6, 2022 10:30 AM EDT

Target, eBay, General Motors and Facebook's parent could be among the stocks in the 2023 version of the Tax Loss Selling Recovery Portfolio.

Be Wary of VMware Based on Its Charts

Bruce Kamich
Jul 6, 2022 8:01 AM EDT

The technical signs are suggesting that the shares of the software provider could weaken.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 09:41 AM EDT STEPHEN GUILFOYLE

    Reweighting Portfolio Positions Through 5 Trades

    Check out what we're doing in the TheStreet's Stoc...
  • 12:01 PM EDT PAUL PRICE

    A Recent Director Buy in Children's Place (PLCE)

    Four of the most recent insider trades in Children...
  • 07:34 AM EDT PAUL PRICE

    A $525,000 Vote of Confidence on Macerich (MAC)

  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2022 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login