• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • TheStreet Smarts
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Stocks

Wall Street's Unhappy Thanksgiving

Technicals and fundamentals don't look so hot these days.
By DOUG KASS
Nov 24, 2015 | 09:05 AM EST
Stocks quotes in this article: NKE, ORLY, SBUX, HD, FB, AMZN, NFLX, GOOG, GOOGL

This commentary originally appeared on Real Money Pro at 9:49 a.m. ET on Monday, Nov. 23. Click here to learn about this dynamic market information service for active traders.

If you think that the market's recent rally is picture perfect, then I have a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn.

Economic news and corporate profits matter, and so does market breadth. Healthy bull markets have broad participation, but unhealthy ones have narrowing participation.

Here's a look at both the technical and fundamental issues that I see facing stocks:

The Technicals: The Rally Has Bad Breadth
The best gauges of market breadth are the advance/decline line and the number of stocks hitting new 52-week highs. 

Strong bull markets exhibit bold cumulative advance/decline lines and expanding 52-week highs, which confirm the highs reached in the broad indices (where large-capitalization stocks dominate). But weak bull markets show breadth that diverges from the big indices on these two measures, failing to confirm the new highs.

To measure this accurately, analysts often look at the relationship between an index's equal-weighted and capitalization-weighted versions. A rising relative line between the two denotes a healthy market, while a declining line means a few large-cap stocks are driving the advance.

This year, the New York Stock Exchange's common-stock-only advance/decline line peaked in May and lagged during the market's recovery from late-September lows.

Moreover, new NYSE 52-week lows have eclipsed new 52-week new highs for some time, as you can in the chart below (which is a bit small, but shows new lows in purple and low highs in black). This is a signpost of underlying weakness:

NYSE-52-Week-Lows-vs-Highs-Chart
Source: StockCharts.com
View Chart » View in New Window »

We can also clearly see a declining trend if we compare the S&P 500's equal-weighted and cap-weighted versions. This shows that the index's large-cap components have outperforming their smaller brethren since mid-April -- and remarkably, still made new lows in the face of a 12% recovery in the overall S&P 500:

This raises the question of whether investors should chase the FANGs or the NOSH -- Nike, (NKE), O'Reilly Automotive (ORLY), Starbucks (SBUX) and Home Depot (HD). These stocks could eventually get defanged because the rest of the market might be unusually vulnerable to a correction.

Large-cap quality holdings might work for a longer time. But without support from the majority of lesser stocks, attrition seems likely to eventually take a toll on the market's current leaders. As the old saying about Wall Street's traditional "Santa Claus Rally" goes: "If Santa Claus should fail to call, bears may come to Broad & Wall."

The Fundamentals:  Good News is Great, Bad News Is Even Better?
The fundamental front shows concerns about punk domestic economic data, as seen in weak retail sales, a manufacturing contraction and a possible peak in housing and autos. We also see the prospects for moderating operating profits, slowing Chinese and Eurozone growth rates and a new multiyear low in high-yield bond prices.

On that last point, high-yield bonds are definitely acting "junky." This chart amplifies just how significantly weak the sector has been this year:

CCC-rated bonds have underperformed BBs over the last 12 months by 700 basis points (and by over 450 basis points ex-energy). There are only three previous instances of such deep underperformance. Two coincide with the mature credit cycles of early 2000 and early 2008 and one was a "false positive" in late 2011.

On the point of slowing global economic growth, Goldman Sachs recently opined that the U.S. economy's natural state has deteriorated from the past and "will remain lower for longer." Indeed, some seven years of monetary easing have served to weaken the economy to the point where secular-growth prospects might be nearly half of what we experienced over the last three to five decades.

Deutsche Bank goes one step further, arguing that after decades of bubbles, reducing the equilibrium real rate of federal funds serves as a negative to growth:

"The real case for policy error -- equilibrium short real rates may be below zero. There are two interpretations of the macroeconomic data that have vastly different implications for the effect of imminent rate hikes. The first is the 'conventional' view, which the Fed subscribes to. This view posits that the short-term real equilibrium rate is around zero. Since the nominal funds rate is at the zero lower bound, policy is accommodative, and this is why the labor market has improved rapidly. Inflation has not picked up because it as a lagging indicator. ...

The alternative view is more worrying. In this view, the equilibrium nominal rate is at present much lower than the Fed thinks, and the equilibrium real rate is meaningfully negative. Policy at present is not very accommodative, and to the extent that it is, inflation is actually running above its equilibrium level, which is close to 1%. ...

This is the important policy-error scenario, because even a very shallow path of rate hikes might drive the real fed funds rate well above the short-term equilibrium real rate, further depressing demand. It is then plausible that the economy would be driven into recession, and the Fed would quickly be forced to abort the hiking cycle."

-- Dominic Konstam, Deutsche Bank

Moreover, there is simply too much debt. Unconventional monetary policy simply expands the debt load and  makes the U.S. economy extremely vulnerable to an interest-rate hike. So, the Fed is trapped.

Meanwhile, the conspicuous flattening in the yield curve is another possible signpost of slowing domestic economic growth and/or a Fed policy error:


Source: Zero Hedge

The Calm Before the Storm
The bottom line: The "Ah-Ha" Moment, where investors lose faith in central bankers, might be ever closer at hand. Both the technicals and fundamentals are conspiring to form a possible toxic market cocktail.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Kass was long NFLX puts and short SBUX, NFLX and FB, although positions may change at any time.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Stocks

More from Stocks

Traders Face the Fed Facts

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
Feb 8, 2023 4:26 PM EST

We've seen some denial about the level of Fed hawkishness, and the action now reflects a more realistic view of the economic situation.

Further Price Weakness Lies Ahead for Zoom Video

Bruce Kamich
Feb 8, 2023 2:35 PM EST

Here's what traders should avoid.

Here Are 2 Reasonably Valued Stocks Made for the 'Compression'

Bret Jensen
Feb 8, 2023 11:30 AM EST

These companies managed to produce solid results in a difficult fourth quarter.

Snap-On Is Close to a Major Upside Breakout

Bruce Kamich
Feb 8, 2023 11:18 AM EST

Here's what aggressive traders could do now.

'What Me Worry?' Market Is Ignoring Big-Time Wall Street Bears

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
Feb 8, 2023 11:17 AM EST

What is most notable about three of the most influential market strategists is how bearish they are.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 08:20 AM EST PETER TCHIR

    Powell, 0DTE Options and How I View This Market Right Now

    Fed Chair Powell is saying all the things I think ...
  • 08:22 AM EST REAL MONEY

    LIVE EVENT: Bruce Kamich and Todd Campbell Share Their Stock Market Insights

    This Monday, Feb. 6 at 12 p.m., our very own exper...
  • 02:58 PM EST REAL MONEY

    Sarge Guilfoyle Breaks Down the Jobs Report, Fed Policy and Stocks!

    Watch it here!
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2023 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login