• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • TheStreet Smarts
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Real Estate

Freddie Mac Hits Its X-Date

Preferred shares in the two GSEs have soared, but what's the next step?
By CHARLES GABRIEL Nov 08, 2013 | 04:00 PM EST
Stocks quotes in this article: FNMA

Freddie Mac announced that it will send the government $30.4 billion yesterday after reporting similar net third-quarter income and reversing deferred tax allowances.

Symbolically, Freddie has now repaid taxpayers on a cash basis, even though the controversial terms of its Preferred Share Purchase Agreements (PSPA) with the Treasury don't allow repayment of $71.3 billion in principal drawn from the government.

After similarly reversing DTA allowances earlier in the year, Fannie Mae (FNMA) reported an $8.7 billion profit, which it also largely transferred to the Treasury (after sweeping all profits above a minimum net worth of $3 billion per the PSPAs). Having remitted $114 billion of $117.1 billion borrowed from the feds, Fannie Mae is poised to also hit x-date, or the point at which it has technically repaid taxpayers, next March.

Elsewhere, preferred shares of both (FNMAS and FMCKJ) hovered above $8, still a 2/3 discount to par but up 300% since March. All this came while the Senate Banking Committee, at its eighth reform hearing, continued to encounter minimal dissent against its goal of forging a bipartisan bill to phase out and replace the GSEs.

I see a disconnect. But what's it mean?

I'd say that the Fannie-Freddie preferred investment remains speculative, but is more rational than consensus readings of Washington's toxic GSE politics might suggest. Meanwhile, shareholders' success or failure in an initial court decision landing as early as next spring could have big implications for the reform debate just ramping up on Capitol Hill.

Freddie's long awaited arrival at x-date seemed to win a more respectful-than-previously accounting from top industry news reporters. The Wall Street Journal's Nick Timiraos, for instance, cited nine reasons for how and why the GSEs have become such cash cows for the government, noting that "a few years ago, the conventional wisdom in Washington said that FNMA and Freddie Mac wouldn't ever be able to make taxpayers whole for (their) 2008 bailouts."

He also observed that home prices are up sharply, fewer homeowners are defaulting, and (my favorite): "(s)ome of the eye-popping profits have been driven by the same accounting rules that required the companies to take eye-popping writedowns five years ago."

The curing of the GSEs' collective book and balance sheets, and the still-solid prospect for nothing done in Washington, hasn't been lost on some investors, of course, as shares of Fannie and Freddie preferreds have reached four-bagger status since March.

Nevertheless, the x-date milestone went unremarked in the Senate Banking Committee, where Chairman Tim Johnson (D-S.D.), Ranking Member Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) and an interested/determined subsection of the panel's 22 members held their eighth hearing on GSE reform since mid-July.

Treasury and the Obama administration have been running Fannie and Freddie flat out as virtual wards of the state to sustain the mortgage and housing markets during and since the Great Recession  and also to keep from having to inflate the federal balance sheet with trillions of dollars in additional debt obligations.

Yet (via the PSPA sweeps) they are also now holding the two companies down, so to speak, giving Congress time to consider legislation to replace them.

As Timiraos wrote, "(i)f it sounds like Fannie and Freddie are making interest payments on a loan that can't ever be repaid, that's because they are."

But, of course, the dynamic could transform yet again. Nothing done this Congress might indeed only add to restiveness as the two companies continue to return cash with their lack of capital neglected. And even that latter point could change if the government loses its defense in court against the lawsuits filed by Perry Capital and other investment firms that have challenged the August 2012 sweep amendments to the PSPAs as unconstitutional.

According to a mid-September agreement  by the presiding judge and opposing counsel, Treasury and FHFA have already been compelled to post "administrative record" filings, as of Oct. 28, and additional motions will be due between now and Jan. 31, in support of a summary judgment motion by Feb. 28.

I have assumed this might yield a decision in the case by as early as 2Q 2014, which not only might have key implications for Fannie-Freddie shareholders, but the political/legislative debate as well. 

I offer no odds on plaintiffs' prospects. Nevertheless, I'd guess that an initial setback could deflate sentiment, but not end investors' quests.

Meanwhile, reinstatement of GSEs ability to retain profits, boost capital and resume paying shareholder dividends would do more than just reward shareholders. It would also test the ability of reformers to quickly respond with legislation to forge a new regime after all. And by that point, should that day ever come, voices in support of a retained role for a reformed/more-utility-like Fannie and Freddie might finally speak louder.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, the author had no positions in any of the securities mentioned.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Real Estate | Economy

More from Real Estate

Is the Tornado Over for Vornado?

Bruce Kamich
May 23, 2023 12:25 PM EDT

Let's check the charts of this Manhattan-based REIT.

My 'Druckenmiller' Investing Game Plan: 3 Ways of Adjusting to the New Reality

Bret Jensen
May 1, 2023 10:00 AM EDT

Here is how I plan to play a sideways market should the hedge fund manager's views turn out to be prescient.

'70s Redux? I'm in Druckenmiller's Camp, But Not Ready to Accept a 'Lost Decade'

Bret Jensen
Apr 28, 2023 12:30 PM EDT

It is eerie how this economic and political environment seems more and more like a previous era.

Don't Believe the Hype: Gladstone Won't Get Caught in a 'Vornado'

Jim Collins
Apr 28, 2023 11:00 AM EDT

Gladstone Commercial couldn't possibly be any less similar to Vornado Realty, and here's where the opportunities lies.

Market 'Addicts' Are Trading on Hope, Not Reality

Maleeha Bengali
Apr 11, 2023 1:15 PM EDT

In the new world of investing, market players will need to do more work picking quality companies than just playing the momentum.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 07:19 PM EDT CHRIS VERSACE

    AAP Podcast: This Company Is Not Going 'Solo'

    Listen in as I talk with the very diversified Solo...
  • 01:51 PM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    Adjusting Your Trading Approach to Shifting Market...
  • 06:54 PM EDT CHRIS VERSACE

    AAP Podcast: A Tongue -- and a Market -- Twister: 'Get a Debt Deal Done'

    Listen in as the Action Alerts PLUS Podcast tackle...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2023 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login