• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • TheStreet Smarts
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Energy

Victors and Victims of $80 Oil, Part 2

In part two, we look at possible problem players in the Bakken.
By DANIEL DICKER Nov 06, 2014 | 02:00 PM EST
Stocks quotes in this article: CLR, EOX, AMZG, MHR, NOG, HK, OAS, TPLM

This column continues my series on $80-per-barrel oil and U.S. shale winners and losers.

In going over third-quarter reports from the U.S. E&Ps, Continental Resources (CLR) was the most interesting to me.  Harold Hamm, CEO of Continental, was virtually alone in cutting 2015 capital expenditures and production guidance, a move obviously designed to help weather what I'm calling an $80-oil winter of sustained low oil prices.

In contrast, virtually every other CEO has "whistled through the graveyard" in refusing to adjust spend and production targets as part of their third-quarter conference calls. Considering that Continental is by far the best positioned Bakken E&P and Harold Hamm perhaps the smartest oilman ever, I tend to think his lone honest assessment will be far more on target than everyone else's.

We are going to see some major production and spend declines caused by $80 oil, and they will be financially forced upon some players that don't have the resilience of Continental Resources.

Let's look at some of the possible problem players in the Bakken.

In part one of our series, we isolated some of the attributes of producers likely to show strain from sustained low oil:  rickety balance sheets, high-yield debt, holdings outside the core of the Nesson Anticline, and behind-the-curve technology and efficiencies, being a few. With this in mind, a couple of companies working in the Williston Basin appear likely to be in trouble over the next six months. Again, my thanks to Michael Filloon of Shaletrader.com for his excellent research help in isolating these likely "weakies:"

Emerald Oil (EOX): Higher well-completion costs and tough debt position. Its upper three forks acreage just won't produce fast enough to deliver a reasonable payback period in an $80 oil environment.

American Eagle (AMZG): Northern acreage is slow producer and can sustain only four wells per sector. 

Magnum Hunter (MHR): Acreage is similar to American Eagle's and it is continually looking to shore up the balance sheet. Survival is dependent on the company's Utica natural gas play and it could make it, but not without jettisoning its Bakken holdings.

Northern Oil and Gas (NOG): Biggest problem, of course, is that the company doesn't own much of its acreage. This non-operative position puts it at the mercy of other operators and their scheduling, sure to decline with a low oil price. Plus, looking at its acreage you'd need much higher oil to deliver a reasonable payback. Six months of prices at this level will hurt a lot.

Triangle Petroleum (TPLM): New acquisitions in the North couldn't have come at a worse time. It has the advantage of its own completion and midstream assets and decent results, but still will likely need an exploration and production slowdown to weather the storm.

Halcon (HK): Good acreage in the Bakken is overridden by a miserable debt position, a race that Halcon will begin to quickly lose in an $80 oil environment. CEO Floyd Wilson has made one too many bad calls with this one (particularly in the Utica) and burdened the company with too much paper. It'll fight to the end, but is in a tough spot. Run, Forrest, run. 

Oasis (OAS): In no danger of folding, but much of the company's acreage is outside the "sweet spot," including some poorly timed new acquisitions. It will have to hunker down in its solid plots in Mountrail, Williams and Mackenzie counties.

I've outlined these players not to predict any of their demises -- all we are seeking to find out is how much production growth is at risk and how soon that production slowdown might appear. Even larger producers like Continental will ultimately see production reductions if oil remains this low for longer than a year. At the end of this series, Michael and I will try to assess how much U.S. production is likely to come off line and when -- which will really mark the opportunity in the space for the future.

Next in the series, we will be attempting to find other stressed producers outside of the Williston Basin. In case you need a teaser, we'll start out in the Mississippi Lime and Tuscaloosa Marine Shale areas.   

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Dicker had no positions in any of the securities mentioned.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Energy

More from Energy

The Pendulum Swings Back, but Don't Look for Things to Stabilize

Peter Tchir
Aug 15, 2022 11:00 AM EDT

It could swing past the point where things look normal or OK to a point where things look bad again.

Where Are Crude Prices Heading, and Could They Clog Up a Recovery?

Bruce Kamich
Aug 12, 2022 11:00 AM EDT

Let's check the charts to see where we can expect oil prices to flow.

PPI Cools, Home Prices Don't, Fed in the Dark, Technical Battle Lines, Chevron

Stephen Guilfoyle
Aug 12, 2022 7:29 AM EDT

Just when is the Federal Reserve going to reduce the cash slosh, anyway?

This New Energy Fund Sounds Dirty, But Could Help Investors Clean Up

Mark Abssy
Aug 11, 2022 1:33 PM EDT

The Strive U.S. Energy exchange-traded fund is billed as an anti-ESG ETF. Let's see how it stacks up against the similar Energy Select SPDR Fund.

CorEnergy Is a Pipeline to High Yield

Jim Collins
Aug 11, 2022 1:15 PM EDT

It's the best of both worlds, a hydrocarbon company that also has a green component.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 02:23 PM EDT STEPHEN GUILFOYLE

    We're Cleaning Out This Retailer From the Bullpen

    Check out the latest moves in TheStreet's Stocks U...
  • 10:24 AM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    To Improve Your Trading and Investing, Spend More ...
  • 08:44 AM EDT PETER TCHIR

    CPI Beats Expectations, But Maybe Not the 'Whisper'?

    Slightly better-than-expected inflation across the...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2022 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login