• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Doug Kass
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Jim Cramer
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Financial Services

The Fed, Swans and Ugly Ducklings

Friday's job figures could be an interest rate factor.
By JIM CRAMER
Nov 03, 2015 | 04:07 PM EST
Stocks quotes in this article: JPM, EMR, ETN, CAT, CVX, XOM, SLB, DD, MRO

They were bad, they just weren't bad enough. They were disappointing but not so disappointing as to freak us out and inspire selling. That's been pretty much the entire theme of this earnings season and it is explaining a lot of the moves we are seeing every day.

Where is this pattern most evident? The industrials. Take Emerson Electric (EMR). This morning it reported what I would regard as one of the most disappointing numbers I can ever recall from this great American industrial: sales down 9%, earnings down, earnings per share off 15%.

If that wasn't enough, CEO David Farr took away any hope for the future saying, "we expect the difficult market conditions through at least the first half of fiscal 2016. " Man, that's just awful. But not so awful as to attract sellers.

So how is the stock of this 3.8% yielder doing? It's rallying. You might think that's insane. But you have to understand that this group, this industrial group, is simply under-owned. The big institutions were scared that the earnings would be bad. They are real bad. However, not only is that yield a good one but Emerson increased its dividend. Sure it was a meager half a cent. You have to think of it like this.

The stock is de-risked. You know everyone who owns this one doesn't expect much. So, what happens if something good has occurred? The bar has been lowered to the point that Emerson 's stock may go higher!

Emerson's not alone. I was bummed last week about the Emerson quarter. There were so many lines of disappointment in a whole host of industries. The only line item that didn't deflate me was aerospace. I had Eaton (ETN) CEO Sandy Cutler on and I knew it would have to be a tough interview.

At the same time, I saw that the stock was yielding four percent. That is where I first started recommending it as an accidental high yielder during the great recession. Unlike back then, I am not the least concerned that the company might report a loss or cut the dividend. In fact, the cash flow was bountiful, much better than expected. The result? The stock rallied, not sold off.

Take Caterpillar (CAT).The company had already pre-announced horrendous earnings going into the formal quarterly report. The number was worse. The guidance even more negative. But did the stock, at that point at $70, plummet back to $63 where it fell to after the original blast of negativity? Nope. In fact the stock rallied. It is now up five points from that hideous quarter. And, take it from me, that was a hideous quarter. There was admission that almost all end markets, particularly mining and oil and gas and the whole country of China, were terrible. This is an astounding move and a sense, again, that Caterpillar  represented a bargain, especially with a yield that was greater than 4%.

Or how about DuPont (DD)? Here was a company that reported a number that was so bad I didn't even deem it worth talking about. The degradation here vs. what I was looking for just a year before was astounding. I had no idea that a company could go from zero to minus 60 in a couple of quarters. Yet the stock? It's gone from $57 to $64. Some of that is because as absolutely gruesome as that quarter was, it could have been even scarier. But also because the company recognized it as repugnant, too, and the new management said everything was on the table for change. Everything. That's a statement that says get long and that's what people did.

It's not just the industrials. Take a look at the banks. At the beginning of this reporting period two banks reported what at the time were lambasted as weak quarters: Goldman Sachs (GS) and JPMorgan Chase (JPM).

I was on the set during the Goldman Sachs big swing and a miss. There was nothing in the quarter that made you think the number was anything but indicative of the state of things at my alma mater. I pointed out on air that the stock, which was dropping to $175 in pre-market trading -- off about five -- was now trading at its book value, which was absurd because it meant that the darned bank could close the doors and be worth more than it was selling for.

Sure enough, the stock's up 16 straight points since the quarter. I remember going back and forth with JPMorgan about how its quarter was perceived as disappointing -- even as there was only one line, the trading line that could be considered worthy of the term disappointment. Didn't matter. The stock dropped a buck from $61 to $60, putting it on a collision course with the September low of $59 or more. Maybe much more.

Nope! It turned out to be a tremendous buying opportunity. The stock of The Bank, as they call in it the hallowed halls, then pirouetted and jumped 10 percent. It doesn't feel like it is done going higher.

Why? Again, I think this was the quarter where investors finally decided that even without the Fed raising rates, these banks are too cheap. And if the Fed ever gets around to doing so, well then these stocks will just go higher.

Perhaps the most amazing moves are saved for the oils. I think this group had not only been written off for dead and had been abandoned,  it was heavily shorted. That is because the chatter going into the quarter was one of credit crunches and dividend reductions. While it is true that a handful of smaller companies are really struggling, the only real dividend cut came from Marathon Oil (MRO), which was sliced from 21 cents to five cents.

My charitable trust had owned the stock in the mid-teens but we booted it. Why? Because we were afraid of the dividend cut. But the stock has subsequently rallied a couple of bucks since the cut. When the worst happens and a stock goes higher you can only imagine how high the best ones are going to go. And that's precisely the case with Exxon Mobil (XOM) and Chevron (CVX) which have broken out to levels that were inconceivable two months ago.

Exxon was at $68 the last week of August. It's now at $87. Chevron just ran from $69 to $98. What did these two behemoths do to earn those bragging rights? They actually reported better- than-expected earnings, even as it's worth noting that the projections had been brought down mightily ahead of the reports. A week ago, we did an off the charts suggesting the unthinkable: with oil headed rapidly to the low $40s, that you should buy Schlumberger (SLB) at $76. It seemed preposterous. Oil's up a couple of bucks since then but the huge oil service company's stock has ignited for 6 points.

In the old days people used to get so excited about the gigantic fields that Pioneer Natural Resources (PXD) had stumbled upon using new fracking techniques in the Permian. That was long ago and far away. Today, it reported and it simply didn't lose as much as people thought it would. The stock rallies ten cents on it.

So how can this be? How can all of these rallies be occurring? Sure, some of it is the gigantic portfolio manager underweighting as I mentioned. But there's also a sense that the Chinese consumer's on the mend and that Europe's turning and that the U.S. has some very strong markets, notably housing and autos.

In other words, the big worries are dissipating and yet the Fed's not about to have an emergency meeting to raise rates one week after it chose not to. In that environment these down and outers are as attractive as the safety stocks are unattractive.

How long can this rally last? I think it can continue right into Friday's employment number, where some of these moves should pause.

A strong number and the Fed will most likely move in December, which will keep propelling the banks but should cause the other stocks to stall. A weak number? We're back to safety first and the profits will be taken in these newfound ugly ducklings turned swans.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.
TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Financial Services

More from Financial Services

3M and Mastercard Continue to Trade Sideways

Bruce Kamich
Jan 20, 2021 10:55 AM EST

Both stocks may eventually do better when investors sense that the economy is indeed going to do better.

Here's Why You Should Keep an Eye on Upstart Holdings

Bruce Kamich
Jan 19, 2021 11:48 AM EST

Keep this newly public company on your shopping list for the first quarter of 2021.

One to Watch: A Strategy for PagSeguro Digital

Timothy Collins
Jan 14, 2021 2:55 PM EST

Here's where I'd look to be a buyer of the stock. On the options side, the market is a little on the thin side, but it is playable.

Why I'm Souring on Lemonade

Bruce Kamich
Jan 13, 2021 2:01 PM EST

LMND shares have tripled in less than two months

Let's Look to TLT to Chart the Future of Interest Rates

Bruce Kamich
Jan 12, 2021 11:56 AM EST

This is the direction the yield on the 10-year treasury looks to be headed.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 09:35 AM EST CHRIS VERSACE

    Another Big Winner for Stocks Under $10

    We're ringing the register Tuesday morning.
  • 08:05 AM EST GARY BERMAN

    Tuesday Morning Fibocall for 1/26/2021

    SPX (Long-Term View) The 1/21/21 NEW high @ 3861...
  • 09:52 AM EST GARY BERMAN

    INDU/DIA 20 DMA

    Fibocall: The DIA has the 20 DMA @ 307.81 and w...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2021 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login