• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Energy

A Tad Askance About Goldman's Oil Call

Why did Goldman's analyst sound the alarm on the oil price?
By JIM CRAMER Oct 27, 2014 | 11:24 AM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: GS, GS, CLR, APC

Maybe this time Goldman gets it right? I am looking at a piece of research from today saying that Brent crude, the worldwide benchmark, is headed lower, perhaps as low as $80 by the summer of 2015. This forecast is a radical change from its previous forecast of $100.  

And I am also looking at a note from last year when Goldman Sachs (GS) said oil could hit $150 by the summer of 2015.

Same analyst; different forecast.

Last year, when Jeff Currie, the "influential" Goldman Sachs oil analyst, made his super-spike call he said that despite the U.S. shale boom, the oil price will remain high because of sanctions-related supply disruptions from Iran. At that time the Saudis were pumping at a "30-year high," implying that the huge producer was giving it all she got, but while global oil demand has increased as a slower pace, it is still higher than the production increases in non-OPEC countries.

The Goldman client note from back then says "we are not out of the woods yet. Upside risks for oil prices include low inventory levels, limited OPEC spare capacity and geopolitical risks, which are really near an all-time high, with production in a very large number of countries at risk. All of this at a time when China growth is expected to improve. With oil at $110 a barrel at that time, it was a bold call implying a 36% increase in Brent price.

Oohhh, really scary.

How about this time though? After oil plunged more than 30% from its high of June of this year, and 23 companies of the 52% of the S&P energy sector components are down more than 20% in the last three months, it is time for Goldman to sound the alarm. Why? Let's tick them down.

In a piece entitled "The new oil order," the same analyst puts his name to a very compelling theory that, one, accelerating non-OPEC production will outpace demand growth, leaving the oil market oversupplied. Wow, I had thought that the non-OPEC countries couldn't make a difference. Two, the scale and sustainability of U.S. shale oil production "is driving the global cost curve lower." Wow, I had that that despite the U.S. shale gas "boom," we would still be oversupplied. In fact, U.S. production needs to slow to get the price stabilized.

Incredibly, it seems that the geopolitical tensions must have lessened despite the advancements of ISIS and the wild card of Russian oil. Looks like that China demand didn't materialize either.

OPEC core nations are losing pricing power, according to the note, the same core nations that seemed so important a year ago.

Of course, this call is wreaking tremendous havoc with the entire group, despite the horrendous pressure that it's been under. Continental Resources (CLR) and Anadarko (APC) in particular are under pressure.

Hmm, to me, perhaps I am being a little too cynical. But what happens if this year's call, which was close to the peak in the cycle, turns out to be as wrong as last year's call? What happens if the incredible declines in the big S&P oils, the worst performing part of the group, actually are just beginning to accelerate, which is implied in this note?

I don't know. Judging by the record of the firm, I guess you have to call me skeptical. Or, and you have to call me a gentleman, too, because there is a time I would have burned the whole oil group in effigy and ridiculed them. Now I just am a tad askance about this big bold call that is crushing the group long after it has already bent, spoiled and mutilated. 

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust, is long GS.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Energy

More from Energy

Can Generac Generate Enough Technical Power to Rally?

Bruce Kamich
Jun 29, 2022 11:55 AM EDT

Sometimes the fundamentals and technical indicators are on the same page and sometimes they are not.

Let's Look Under the 'Shell' of This ESG-Style Fund

Mark Abssy
Jun 28, 2022 2:00 PM EDT

One of the Nuveen Global Net-Zero Transition exchange-traded fund's largest holdings is Shell, so let's drill down on this supposedly environmentally friendly ETF.

The Fed Blinked and So Did We

Peter Tchir
Jun 27, 2022 9:30 AM EDT

Here's what we need to get a bigger rally.

See That Down the Road? It's the Big 'Green' Bubble, Ready to Pop

Jim Collins
Jun 24, 2022 1:30 PM EDT

Environmental, social, and corporate governance has created a monster and gullible investors should hit the brakes on their EVs and run from the Washington technocrats while they have the chance.

Weber's Rally Was Cooked Up By the Shorts and Something I Experienced First Hand

Jonathan Heller
Jun 24, 2022 10:00 AM EDT

It should be an interesting ride from here.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 04:51 PM EDT PAUL PRICE

    We should be in for better starting soon.

    Window dressing tomorrow, the last day of ...
  • 11:56 AM EDT STEPHEN GUILFOYLE

    Stocks Under $10

    Check out what's going on in the Stocks Under $10 ...
  • 12:04 AM EDT PAUL PRICE

    Two Good Signs -- Especially for Small-Cap Investors

  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2022 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login