• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Financial Services

Hey Volcker, Thanks For Nuthin'

The former Fed chair didn't break the back of inflation; he broke the back of the economy.
By MIKE NORMAN Oct 19, 2016 | 12:01 PM EDT

One of the most enduring clichés is the following: "Paul Volcker broke the back of inflation." Whoever came up with this is a marketing genius because people are still walking around today, 36 years later, repeating this ridiculous lie.

Every time I write an article about how higher rates equate to price increases and, thus, raise the level of inflation generally, people comment or email to "remind" me that Volcker broke the back of inflation by raising interest rates. Volcker did not break the back of inflation. He didn't break any backs. Just about the only thing he did was cause a major recession that needlessly put lots of people out of work.

I can't believe that no one has debunked this yet because the data is very clear. I am going to do it now. To do this analysis I will use the discount rate because that was the policy rate the Fed used in the 1970s and 1980s.

Starting in November 1970 when Arthur Burns was the Fed chairman the discount rate was 5.75% and inflation was running at 5.6% annually. By 1974 Burns had jacked up the discount rate to 8% -- a 60% increase -- and inflation had gone from 5.6% to 10% annually.

By November 1976 Burns had reduced the discount rate to 5.25% from 10% and inflation had fallen to 5% annually. Then by August 1979, which is when Volcker was appointed as Fed chairman, the discount rate was all the way back up to 10.5% and inflation had jumped to 11.8%.

Volcker continued to raise rates, pushing the discount rate to 13% by February 1980. The economy entered a recession in March of that year, but inflation was still running at 14%. Inflation would have kept on going and the recession, which at the time was the most severe in post-WWII history, would have deepened if rates had gone higher. However, other factors drove down prices: the deregulation of oil and gas industries; major oil discoveries in the North Sea and Alaska; and Ronald Reagan's firing of air traffic controllers plus the period it ushered in, which was the breaking of the labor unions.

By 1992 the discount rate had fallen to 3% and inflation was running at about 3%. Then, when the discount rate was raised to 6% in 2000, inflation bounced back, too, and came in at just under 4%.

As you can see there is a total correlation between rates and inflation and it is certainly not the inverse correlation that most people believe. It's a direct correlation. Raise rates and that raises the cost of goods and services and therefore it raises general price levels.

I have done articles showing that higher rates do not impede the growth of loans and credit. For example, in November 1976, when the discount rate was 5.25%, year-over- year loan growth was 7%. Yet in February 1980, when the discount rate was 13%, year-over-year loan growth was 13%.

The chart below, which tracks the Fed funds rate and annual changes in the Consumer Price Index, shows clearly that the relationship between interest rates and inflation are highly correlated and not in an inverse way.

So you see, it's practically a one-to-one correlation. You could pretty much superimpose these two lines.

Volcker did not break the back of inflation. He just broke the back of the economy.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.
TAGS: Financial Services | Investing | Economy

More from Financial Services

The Best House in This Neighborhood Is on Sale

Brad Ginesin
Jun 24, 2022 12:15 PM EDT

The buying opportunity here below book value is compelling.

Affirm: Will Investors Buying Now, Pay for It Later?

Bruce Kamich
Jun 22, 2022 3:12 PM EDT

Let's see what the charts and indicators suggest.

American International Is Breaking a Longer-Term Uptrend Line

Bruce Kamich
Jun 13, 2022 1:51 PM EDT

Is there more risk than reward?

Investors Are Losing Interest in Mortgage Lenders as Interest Rates Rise

Ed Ponsi
Jun 9, 2022 8:30 AM EDT

The charts of a number of the nation's largest mortgage lenders indicate more pain to come for holders of those stocks.

Looking to Lehman for Lessons About Today

Ed Ponsi
Jun 2, 2022 10:00 AM EDT

Let's review what happened to this financial giant in 2008 and what it could tell investors about the current market.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 04:51 PM EDT PAUL PRICE

    We should be in for better starting soon.

    Window dressing tomorrow, the last day of ...
  • 11:56 AM EDT STEPHEN GUILFOYLE

    Stocks Under $10

    Check out what's going on in the Stocks Under $10 ...
  • 12:04 AM EDT PAUL PRICE

    Two Good Signs -- Especially for Small-Cap Investors

  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2022 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login