• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • TheStreet Smarts
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Economic Data

The 6 Headwinds of the Apocalypse

An economist suggests that US economic growth per capita has peaked.
By GENE BALAS Oct 10, 2012 | 03:30 PM EDT

A simple way to explain how fast an economy can grow without sparking higher inflation is to deconstruct it based on the growth of the labor force plus productivity gains. Currently, the U.S. labor force is growing at about 1% annually, and productivity, which fluctuates from quarter to quarter, has often been seen around 1.5% to 2%. This yields annual, economy-wide trend growth of 2.5% to 3%. Let's take a midpoint of 2.8% and then express it on a per-capita basis, or 1.8% (given population growth of 1%).

What can change this equation is the amount of productivity gains and the difference between labor-force growth and population growth, focusing on GDP per capita. Lower productivity gains, or faster population growth vs. the labor force, argue for lower GDP per capita growth. In essence, that is how much living standards might be expected to improve.

Robert J. Gordon, an economist at Northwestern University, has an interesting take on how six headwinds can adversely affect living standards. In a paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research (the same group that dates the beginning and end of U.S. recessions), Gordon suggests that per capita GDP in the U.S. for coming decades could be as low as 0.2%. He asserts that economic growth has been this low as far back as the year 1300, using data for the U.K., and it wasn't until three major industrial or technological revolutions that we saw stronger growth. (He used U.K. data through 1906 and the U.S. thereafter.) These revolutions are railroads and steam engines from 1750 to 1830; internal combustion engines, electricity, petroleum, and communications from 1870 to 1900; and computers, the Web and mobile phones from 1960 to the present.

Gordon views the second group of technological advances as the most important to increasing productivity, including the eventual contributions of air travel, interstate highways and air conditioning. These coincided with demographic trends, such as increased urbanization and the role of women in the workplace, to create increased growth and prosperity.

He believes we are in a phase where these trends will no longer have an incremental benefit to the economy, as their benefits are already included in GDP, hence no additional growth from these factors. In other words, new technologies have already been widely adopted. Instead, we now have six headwinds:

  1. Demographics of retiring baby boomers and an end to growth of the number of women in the workforce. This leads to a decline in the hours worked per capita, thus leading to lower incomes taken together.
  2. A plateau in educational attainment, as college enrollment is challenged by high costs, while the U.S. lags other nations in math, science and reading (as measured by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development).
  3. Rising income inequality. Gordon says that the average growth in real household incomes was 1.3% annually between 1993 and 2008, but only 0.75% for the bottom 99%, while the top 1% saw income grow than the average. The top 1% captured 52% of income gains, according to Gordon's calculations.
  4. Globalization and information and communication technology (ICT) promote outsourcing of American jobs, and the elimination of some occupations.
  5. Energy and environmental legislation, even if necessary for ecological reasons, reduce economic output.
  6. High household and government debt divert funds that would have been devoted to consumption to debt reduction.

Together, he reckons that all of these headwinds could reduce U.S. GDP growth per capita to just 0.2% from 1.8% between now and 2100, though he emphasizes the direction, not the particular number. He acknowledges that some as-yet-unknown technological breakthrough could increase growth per capita, but not all of this might accrue to the U.S. because developing economies favor greater growth overseas as they catch up to ours and our wages adjust to factor in that competition.

While future outcomes are always unknown, that should not stop us from considering multiple viewpoints of the possibilities. While none of these headwinds seem unrealistic to me conceptually, Gordon admits his numbers are difficult to quantify exactly. Perhaps his pessimism is unfounded, perhaps not. Only time will tell.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.
TAGS: Economic Data | Investing

More from Economic Data

Treasury Pressure, Magnificent Flight, AI's Good and Bad, Five-Headed Fed Punch

Stephen Guilfoyle
Oct 3, 2023 7:56 AM EDT

While the Nasdaq has posted four consecutive winning sessions, the bottom fishing that has benefited the large tech names may be growing exhausted.

Tom Lee: Here's Why We Believe Stocks Can Rally Into Year-End

Tom Lee and the FSI Team
Oct 2, 2023 9:00 AM EDT

After a challenging few months, investors are skeptical at start of October. But we remain constructive on stocks into year-end, even with near-term risks.

FS Insight Weekly Roadmap: Q4 Shows Promise After 'Vortex of Pain'

Tom Lee and the FSI Team
Sep 30, 2023 9:06 AM EDT

Despite a high volume of noise, inflation remains the primary macro driver for markets, while a government shutdown could put the Fed on an automatic 'structural pause.'

Dip Buyers Should Check Out These 3 Stocks

Ed Ponsi
Sep 29, 2023 12:30 PM EDT

Let's go to the charts to create game plans for three names that have fallen into oversold territory.

What a Government Shutdown Could Mean for the Stock Market

Tom Lee and the FSI Team
Sep 29, 2023 8:33 AM EDT

In some ways, a government shutdown might actually automatically put the Fed on a 'structural pause.'

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 12:13 PM EDT BRUCE KAMICH

    8 Trading Rules from T. T. Hoyne

    You just read the header for this missive and prob...
  • 08:42 AM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    How Elite Traders Make Big Profits
  • 02:58 PM EDT BRUCE KAMICH

    Classic Trading Rules From Bernard Baruch

    Bernard Baruch listed the rules (below) in his aut...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2023 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login