• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Doug Kass
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Jim Cramer
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Energy

Making Bets on Copper, Coal or Iron Is a Bad Idea

The idea that any of these commodity companies is out of the woods is just fanciful.
By JIM CRAMER
Oct 01, 2015 | 11:00 AM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: GLCNF, FCX, ANR, BTU, ACI, VALE, BHP, RIO

Of all the commodities to go nuts about, of all the commodities to make positive bets on, copper, coal and iron have to be the worst. And yet those are the three commodities that seem to have seen the most interest and attracted the most leverage, just when the great commodity boom ended.

I totally get the issues in oil. The U.S. took production up gigantically, from 5.6 million barrels a day to a staggering 9.3 million barrels a day from 2011 to 2015. That made sense. There's always going to be a fairly robust market for oil, and, most important, as prices decline, more does get used. We have terrific light sweet crude production, and we'd be getting a lot more for it if we could export it -- as right now the companies that produce it can't get enough refinery capacity domestically to be able to get as big a profit as they would like, although more is coming online.

But ramping up copper, coal and iron ore? These were uniquely stupid bets. Think about these lunkheads. Glencore (GLCNF), a trading firm that is light on assets, spends $41 billion for Xstrata to become a gigantic copper miner, just when copper was rolling over. Freeport (FCX), so confident in the cash flow of its copper mines, buys Plains and McMoran Exploration near the height of the oil boom at the end of 2012 for $9 billion.

The coal acquisitions? I can't even begin to understand what they were thinking. Alpha Natural (ANR) spending $7 billion to buy the totally hobbled Massey back in 2011 being perhaps the most unimaginable. And then there are the production ramp-ups at Peabody (BTU) and Arch (ACI) to meet world demand. Here is what Peabody Energy CEO Gregory Boyce said at a conference in June 2010: "We're in the early stages of a 30-year super cycle in global coal markets." He was confident that demand would accelerate for coal over the next decade. Accelerate! 

And finally there are the three stooges of iron ore: Vale (VALE), BHP Billiton (BHP) and Rio Tinto (RIO). All three have been boosting output, with Vale stepping up production massively, this most recent quarter being the second biggest on record. Iron prices have fallen by two thirds over the past two years and the glut is only intensifying. Anyone have a way out of Cliffs Natural (CLF), which has about $3 billion in borowings? In retrospect, the Casablanca Capital activist challenge was one of the worst I have ever seen. The winners just plain lost.

Now the high yield market is truly being crushed by all of these producers who need credit. More importantly, when you hear about the issues involving, say, Glencore, remember you are talking not about things they can do to save themselves. You are talking about the price of copper. When you think about Peabody trying to not have to restructure, you are thinking about the price of coal.

Which is why the idea that any of these commodity companies is "out of the woods" is just fanciful. You just aren't going to cut your way out of these situations.

So remember, there's been tremendous damage here, almost all self-inflicted, and the end of the quarter offers no respite at all to any of these companies, even if their stocks saw selling decrease. Demand, so muted for all of these, is showing no signs of getting better; in fact it is getting worse -- because, alas, it is their own darned fault.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust, has no positions in the stocks mentioned.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Energy

More from Energy

This Refinery's 5.8% Dividend Yield Is Betting on a Recovery

Bob Ciura
Feb 19, 2021 12:30 PM EST

Valero Energy's dividend has not been cut, despite hard times. There is the possibility for outsized returns from a quicker than anticipated bounce back in demand, but clear risk remains.

Looking for an Energy Boost? Try Royal Dutch Shell's 3.5% Dividend Yield

Bob Ciura
Feb 18, 2021 12:32 PM EST

Shell suffered along with the rest of the oil and gas sector last year. But it could be a good dividend play once again.

First Solar's Charts Are Showing Some Cracks

Bruce Kamich
Feb 18, 2021 10:05 AM EST

It looks like FSLR has started a move lower.

How Macro Flows Can Distort the Physical Oil Market Dynamics - But for How Long?

Maleeha Bengali
Feb 16, 2021 1:15 PM EST

The macro tailwind only works for the oil market until physical market dynamics take over. When they do, unwinds can be sharp and painful.

Are Higher Energy Prices the Next New Normal? A Look at the XLE Breakout

Bruce Kamich
Feb 16, 2021 10:25 AM EST

Stay nimble and focus on the bigger picture.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 08:36 AM EST GARY BERMAN

    Wednesday Morning Fibocall for 2/24/2021

    SPX (Long-Term View) The 2/16 HIGH @ 3950.43 is ...
  • 08:30 AM EST GARY BERMAN

    Tuesday Morning Fibocall for 2/23/2021

    SPX (Long-Term View) The 2/16 HIGH @ 3950.43 is ...
  • 04:52 PM EST CAROLYN BORODEN

    WMT Updated

    View Chart » View in New Window » Since we vio...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2021 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login