• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Doug Kass
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Jim Cramer
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Technology

Any Twitter Acquirer Could Be Taking a Flyer

Potential buyers should beware of the social media giant and its still-unproven business model.
By BRIAN SOZZI Sep 26, 2016 | 10:00 AM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: TWTR, GOOGL, CRM, FB, LN

Those reportedly licking their chops for a bite of Twitter (TWTR) may want to think twice before swallowing a potential poison pill.

Make no mistake: Twitter the platform does some great things. It's the first place where news breaks and the best place to track developments in real time. For example, on Sunday Twitter was the first platform I saw with photos of the boat that tragically took the life of baseball star Jose Fernandez. It was also the same place I heard of the passing of American golf legend Arnold Palmer. Twitter is also pretty good at connecting influencers with their fans and helping to drive healthy debates (although those debates could get way out of hand) on buzzy topics. But for all its good, Twitter has a ton of basic problems that go beyond being an outlet for potential criminals.

So buyer beware, Alphabet (GOOGL) , Salesforce (CRM) or whatever other party is stalking Twitter right now. Any company that would get Twitter would have a hard time justifying paying an exorbitant sum to its board. Here are three reasons why.

Business model still has not been proven

Considering the prices talked about for Twitter, it would be nice for the company to have earned a profit at one point since going public, no? Unfortunately for those on Twitter's board itching for a sale, profits have been non-existent and the platform hasn't shown it can generate profits at some pre-determined point in the future. As a result, a rational party doesn't even know if Twitter has a viable model. Right now it's a giant high school experiment that so happens to be a publicly traded company. In fancy terms, Twitter doesn't have proof of concept, and having that proof of concept is important when a deal that could alter the structure of a public company already doing well is presented to the board.

New ventures, so where is the money?

Twitter hasn't shown that its newest ventures could make money within the next five or 10 years. Take a look at Periscope. For starters, the user interface is horrible and should come with a 20-page digital user manual. But in terms of business model, how on Earth does Twitter think it can place ads on a platform such as Periscope? If a 15-year-old kid on Twitter has to wait 30 seconds for an ad to play before shooting a Periscope of an event in their life, it's going to turn them off. What will they do instead? Take a regular video using their iPhone and then upload it to Facebook. That is even if the 15-year-old is on Twitter instead of the way more popular Snapchat, WeChat or any number of services that this old millennial is aware of because all he does is write columns each day.

The primary takeaway is that Twitter is pouring money into ventures that may have no chance of viability at any point in its life. Why would a deep-pocketed tech giant pay a premium to gain exposure to that? For the sake of putting money to work on something other than stock repurchases? Twitter certainly could continue to invest in things such as Periscope, but in order to do so it has to cut costs more deeply than the ones made so far by Jack Dorsey. There still remains a ton of fat at Twitter. The company would benefit from the zero-sum budgeting practices employed in the packaged goods space.

Just where are all the eyeballs?

Bluntly, Twitter is for sports stars who have a team of people tweeting for them, journalists trying to drive clicks, frauds, and people who potentially want to cause us harm. In other words, the group is limited. Twitter just doesn't have the mass appeal that drove Facebook (FB) and Instagram to fame and, more recently, Snapchat. Despite enhancements to the user interface (Moments is horrible), Twitter is boring to use for most because it doesn't provide the instant gratification that an Instagram offers. Even if I have one follower on Instagram, I could still secure hundreds of ego-stroking likes by playing around with trending hashtags. Using myself as an example on Facebook, a video interview I did last Black Friday with the CEO of Toys R' Us for TheStreet got more than 2 million views. I have never gotten 2 million likes or retweets on Twitter, and am not even sure if it's possible.

Twitter's limited appeal shows up in user-number comparisons, which have been sluggish in recent quarters. Twitter's users tally more than 313 million (who knows if most of them are engaged users), badly trailing Facebook's more than 1.65 billion users. Instagram weighs in at more than 500 million. Newly minted public company Line (LN) has over 218 million users.

A person can't be on every app around the clock; they pick and choose based on what's cool and where their community exists. Looking at Twitter's stalled user numbers, folks are voting that their community isn't necessarily on Twitter, and therefore why should they be.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

Employees of TheStreet are restricted from trading individual securities.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Technology | Mergers and Acquisitions | Stocks

More from Technology

Palantir Technologies Looks Toppy and Further Declines Are Possible

Bruce Kamich
Jan 21, 2021 11:06 AM EST

Stand aside from the long side.

Tech Gives Push to Market's Rotation

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
Jan 20, 2021 4:49 PM EST

Money moved back into big-cap technology names, thanks to strong positive reactions to earnings from Netflix.

Netflix's Post-Earnings Surge Might Bode Well for Microsoft, Facebook and Amazon

Eric Jhonsa
Jan 20, 2021 2:40 PM EST

The streaming giant's numbers and commentary were arguably just good, rather than amazing. But with its stock having underperformed for months, that's all that markets needed.

Nano Dimension's Cash Raising Could Lead to Some Intriguing Scenarios

Timothy Collins
Jan 19, 2021 12:15 PM EST

In four months, NNDM will have raised $1 billion in cash.

Cybersecurity Stocks that Lagged in 2020 Could Get Boost from SolarWinds Hack

Eric Jhonsa
Jan 16, 2021 8:00 AM EST

The hack stands to drive an uptick in corporate and government spending to protect both on-premise and cloud assets.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 11:16 AM EST CHRIS VERSACE

    Worst Stocks to Buy for the Biden Presidency

    Biden's take on the minimum wage, likely moves on ...
  • 08:35 AM EST GARY BERMAN

    Thursday Morning Fibocall for 1/21/2021

    SPX (Long-Term View) The 1/20/21 NEW high @ 3859...
  • 11:38 AM EST CHRIS VERSACE

    Best Stocks to Buy for the Biden Presidency

    President-elect Biden's massive stimulus plan, int...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2021 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login