• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • TheStreet Smarts
  1. Home
  2. / Markets

Fed Strategy Is Having Unintended Effect

Activity that would warrant raising rates hasn't fully materialized.
By ROGER ARNOLD Sep 15, 2015 | 05:00 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: F, GM, HMC, TM, NSANY

One of the most often-cited rationales for the Fed to begin raising interest rates is that it will supply banks with a justification for increasing consumer loan rates, which will cause net interest margins (NIM) to increase at the banks, which will cause banks to become more aggressive in making loans. Simultaneously, as the theory goes, consumers will respond by increasing their borrowing before the rates head even higher. This increased lending activity and associated liquidity will allow for incrementally looser lending standards, which will in turn pull other consumers into borrowing, which will cause economic activity to increase and the virtuous cycle of consumption, production, job and income growth to begin.

The transmission for such is roughly that higher short-end loan rates and Treasury yields caused by the Fed increasing the overnight lending rate will cause 1) consumer loan rates tied to short-end rates, principally auto and revolving credit facility rates, to increase, thus pulling future demand into the present, and 2) that higher short-end rates will cause bond holders to shift to shorter maturity issues from longer term, which will cause long-end yields, especially the 10-year Treasury yield, to increase. This will drive up the cost of consumer loan rates tied to long-end rates, principally residential mortgages, and that will cause consumers to rush to purchase a home before higher rates price them out of the market.

The two most important issues with respect to this theory are that in order for the process to work as intended, NIMs must already be low enough that the banks are not motivated to lend and that there is pent-up consumer demand that's not been motivated to borrow because a "paradox of thrift" has become ingrained in the consumer psyche as a result of loan rates being low for several years, and has demotivated potential borrowers from actualizing that borrowing.

In essence, the theory is that a bid-to-ask spread has developed between lenders and borrowers, wherein the rate at which lenders are willing to lend, especially for residential mortgages, is higher than the rate at which borrowers are willing to borrow. The standoff between the two groups has gone on for so long, almost seven years now, that the Fed's zero-interest-rate policy has counterintuitively, counterproductively and unintentionally demotivated borrowers and is thus now the cause of economic stagnation rather than the opposite.

However, as auto loan rates have increased over the past few years, there's been an even faster deceleration in growth of auto loans and auto purchases, which implies that consumers are still rate-sensitive, will not respond well to increasing loan rates for mortgages, and that the "pent-up demand" and "paradox of thrift" arguments for raising rates are dubious.  

I last discussed this issue in the column, "The Changing American Dream: From House to Car," and it's been exhibited as well by Ford (F), General Motors (GM), Toyota (TM), Honda (HMC) and Nissan (NSANY) all having negative two-year returns on their stocks.  (Ford is part of TheStreet's Dividend Stock Advisor portfolio.)

Coming back to the NIM issue, although they have indeed steadily declined since the Fed funds rate target was lowered to 0%-25%, at the current industry aggregate rate of about 3%, they are very near where they were at the height of the housing bubble in 2006. Competition for the making of consumer loans precluded the banks from increasing their NIMs then, and it is most logical that the same ceiling would be caused to occur in the event that consumer loan taking, especially for mortgages, were to occur again.

It is also more probable that the hesitancy of banks and mortgage-backed securities (MBS) buyers to be willing to lower mortgage rates to the level at which marginal consumer demand would increase is that there is a fear of holding securities that would incur losses if rates rose.

The fear of rate increases that would cause losses to be incurred by the loan and MBS holders is being driven not by economic fundamentals but because the Fed has been telegraphing and promising that rates will be increasing.

The problem, of course, is that this prevents the loan activity and consumer activity that would cause economic activity to increase and warrant concerns about inflation by the Fed that would justify raising rates.   

The bottom line right now is that the most probable reason the economy is not evidencing rates of inflation the Fed models indicate should be occurring is that the Fed has been attempting to stick to a narrative and timeline for raising rates that is not warranted by economic activity, and in so doing preventing the activity that would warrant raising rates.  

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Arnold had no positions in the stocks mentioned.

TAGS: Markets

More from Markets

The Market is Hitting a Short-Term Peak

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
Aug 17, 2022 7:40 AM EDT

The intraday reversal Tuesday may have cooled off the momentum and will allow some consolidations and pullbacks to develop.

What Rally? Home Builder Sentiment, July Retail Sales, Fed, Hearing Aids, Costco

Stephen Guilfoyle
Aug 17, 2022 7:18 AM EDT

I think the most troubling data-point Tuesday was the analysis concerning contract or 'home-purchase agreement' cancellations.

Japan Rises Above Pre-Covid Levels, Set for 3 Years of Growth

Alex Frew McMillan
Aug 17, 2022 6:15 AM EDT

The tortoise of Japan may be far behind the hare in the West, but Tokyo is pacing itself for steady multiyear growth.

Doug Kass: We May Now Be Approaching Another Important Top in the Market

Doug Kass
Aug 16, 2022 1:30 PM EDT

To justify buying at today's prices means that one expects a new Bull Market leg - something I remain dubious of.

This Market Needs Some Corrective Action

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
Aug 16, 2022 11:18 AM EDT

It's likely to occur on a rolling basis and won't be that evident in the senior indexes.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 02:23 PM EDT STEPHEN GUILFOYLE

    We're Cleaning Out This Retailer From the Bullpen

    Check out the latest moves in TheStreet's Stocks U...
  • 10:24 AM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    To Improve Your Trading and Investing, Spend More ...
  • 08:44 AM EDT PETER TCHIR

    CPI Beats Expectations, But Maybe Not the 'Whisper'?

    Slightly better-than-expected inflation across the...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2022 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login