• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Energy

Contractors Eye Military's Energy Needs

But until the Pentagon is willing to pay a premium for renewable sources, business opportunities in this sector may remain thin.
By GLENN WILLIAMS Sep 12, 2011 | 03:15 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: BA, SI, LMT, SAI, BAH

The U.S. military has an energy problem. It's the nation's largest individual consumer of petroleum, has a mandate to consume less, has another mandate to use alternative fuels and has no money to conform to either mandate. As a result, the U.S. military is looking for a free lunch.

According to the Department of Defense (DoD), the federal government consumes approximately 145 million barrels per year of petroleum. Of that, the military consumes 92.5%, or approximately 135 million barrels per year. The DoD is the nation's largest consumer, but is not the market maker; its overall consumption represents less than 2% of the national demand.

Of the three branches, the Air Force consumes approximately 57% of DoD's fuel. Next is the Navy at 34%. Finally, the Army consumes the remaining 9%.

The Pentagon wants to buy less petroleum, natural gas and electricity. In their place, the military wants to take advantage of energy efficiency opportunities and use more renewable energy. There has been a collective awakening within the U.S. military. They have been aggressively seeking ways to become less reliant on petroleum and more on renewables.

Two drivers have become mandates for the nation's generals. One is a set of federal statutes and executive orders and the other is the result of experience in warfare, including lessons learned in transporting fuel in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Three statutes mandate energy efficiency and renewable energy. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 requires specific amounts of renewable energy to be the source of all electricity consumed by the military. The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 reasserts the requirement to use renewable energy for electricity, to include renewable energy sources for hot water, and to reduce the amount of fossil fuels in new and renovated buildings (fuel oil, coal and natural gas are fossil fuels). The National Defense Authorization Act of 2010 directs the Secretary of Defense to consider renewable fuels in aviation, maritime and ground transportation fleets.

Two executive orders from two separate administrations direct how energy is to be consumed in federal buildings and transportation fleets. Executive Order 13423 requires certain energy efficiency goals will be achieved, requires the use of renewable energy as a resource, and directs alternative fuel use in government vehicles. Executive Order 13514 directs the reduction in production of greenhouse gases, requires new federal buildings to achieve net zero energy, requires a reduction in net water consumption, and directs waste minimization on federal bases.

If the will of Congress and executive orders from President Bush and President Obama weren't enough to motivate the nation's generals, the nation's experience in war is the final straw. According to Sierra Magazine (http://tinyurl.com/3dspwm6), "The U.S. military is embracing alternative energy -- but not because of climate change. Up to half of the yearly American casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan have been incurred guarding fuel convoys, and the Pentagon will no longer tolerate oil's burden in blood."

Faced with declining revenues, the nation's government contractors are looking at the energy sector, seeing an opportunity, and are offering the military energy services. The low hanging fruit is energy efficiency.

According to Energy Daily, The Boeing Company (BA) and Siemens AG (SI) recently announced a strategic alliance for the joint development and marketing of "smart grid" technologies to improve energy access, energy security and energy efficiency for DOD.

Lockheed Martin (LMT), SAIC (SAI), Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and other federal integrators are competing in the same space. The problem is the Pentagon does not have extra funds for new projects, particularly energy projects.

One key to success with the Pentagon is a contractiaction of energy performance. The contractor has to invest money to save the government money and the contractor can share in the savings. Alternatively, the contractor may have to examine the military's items and prove that the proposed investment will save the government money or soldiers' lives year over year.

Until the Pentagon is willing to pay a premium for renewables, business opportunities in the military's energy sector may be thin. However, should petroleum prices exceed biofuel production costs, there could be a bonanza for government contractors.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Glenn Williams had no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Williams does sit on the Secure Sustainable Group (SSG), which evaluates energy programs within the federal sector.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Energy

More from Energy

Oil, War and Inflation: Here's Where Prices Are Likely Headed

Carley Garner
May 18, 2022 1:00 PM EDT

Oil has a war and inflation hedge premium, but those aren't permanent.

Occidental Petroleum Continues to Target Higher Prices

Bruce Kamich
May 16, 2022 2:52 PM EDT

Here's our first price target and our long term objective.

Diamondback's FANGs Could Dull in the Short-Term

Bruce Kamich
May 13, 2022 9:30 AM EDT

Let's check out the charts of this oil producer.

Trading for a Bounce -- Not a Bottom

Peter Tchir
May 10, 2022 10:00 AM EDT

Here's my thinking on the Nasdaq, bonds, energy, commodities and crypto right now.

If You Insist on Trading This Brutal Market, Don't Get Lazy With Your Stops

Bob Byrne
May 10, 2022 8:30 AM EDT

That word of warning applies to ETFs and individual stocks such as Intercept Pharmaceuticals, which we outline a trading strategy for here.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 03:07 PM EDT PAUL PRICE

    Why Is Walmart Down Big Today?

    Besides its poor earnings report Walmart was way...
  • 07:14 PM EDT PAUL PRICE

    A New, Very Scary Movie

  • 08:51 AM EDT PAUL PRICE

    Advice From the Future...

  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2022 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login