• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Doug Kass
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Jim Cramer
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Energy

Entergy's Domino Effect in Nuke Closings

Behind Entergy press release, Pilgrim closure will follow Vermont Yankee without FERC changes.
By GLENN WILLIAMS
Sep 06, 2013 | 05:00 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: ETR, EXC, AEP, FE, GE

Either Entergy's (ETR) press release is incorrect or the company is warning that another nuclear power plant is about to be retired.

Last week, Entergy announced its decision to retire Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station or Vermont Yankee for short. This decision came after company spent years and millions of dollars to win a 20-year license extension from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.  

Vermont Yankee was unable to compete in New England's power markets. No additional capital investments or cost controls could improve the plant's economics. Entergy's only prudent decision was to cut its losses and protect shareholders.

Entergy's announcement made it clear the decision was about economics. The decision to close Vermont Yankee was based on a number of factors, including:

"A natural gas market that has undergone a transformational shift in supply due to the impacts of shale gas, resulting in sustained low natural gas prices and wholesale energy prices."

  • "A high cost structure for this single unit plant. In addition, the financial impact of cumulative regulation is especially challenging to a small plant in these market conditions."
  • "Wholesale market design flaws that continue to result in artificially low energy and capacity prices in the region, and do not provide adequate compensation for the fuel diversity benefits they provide."
  • Entergy was impacted by the deregulated power market where Vermont Yankee sells its wholesale power. The market, called ISO New England, is governed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

Entergy claimed ISO New England's market prices were too low. They also argued Vermont Yankee's production costs were too high. Low market prices and high production costs erodes Vermont Yankee's margins.

Nevertheless, Entergy's discussion of natural gas is a distraction. According to the Energy Information Administration, utilities have been paying an average price of approximately $5.00 per mmBtu for fuel, which is approximately 70% higher than last year. The trend is for higher prices. Using Entergy's argument, higher gas prices should improve market prices for their power.

Their argument is more puzzling considering New England utilities pay higher than average prices for natural gas. The culprit is constrained pipelines, which limit gas supplies into New England. When national prices are at $4.00, New England's hub prices frequently migrate above $10.00 and $20.00. In fact, New England imports costly Liquefied Natural Gas to supplement pipeline supplies.

Most shale gas cannot reach New England's markets. Consequently, shale gas has not overwhelmed New England with excessive supplies. Shale gas is not the primary issue.

Entergy's real issue is buried in its press release. It is their third factor: structural flaws in ISO New England's market design. Their third factor is really their primary factor.

FERC's market design is flawed. Entergy, Exelon (EXC), American Electric Power (AEP), FirstEnergy (FE) and other power suppliers have been complaining that FERC's market design ignores fuel diversity and punishes capital investment. To fix the flaw, suppliers like Entergy need guaranteed fixed monthly payments over extended periods.

Specifically, utilities dislike a single payment structure used by some markets. They need a range of capacity payments, which are economically linked to fuel sources. For example, nuclear would earn one level of capacity payment. Coal would earn a different level. Natural gas would earn different levels, depending on capital costs.

Entergy's real issue is the structural flaws found in FERC-regulated energy markets. Unfortunately, their message is lost when they introduce unrelated issues, such as shale gas prices.

Their explanations about retiring Vermont Yankee raise new concerns about its other nuclear facilities. It turns out that Entergy operates two nuclear plants in ISO New England's market. Entergy also owns Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, and Pilgrim looks a lot like Vermont Yankee.

Not only do they operate in the same market, Pilgrim and Vermont Yankee look like twins. Vermont Yankee and Pilgrim are single unit plants. Vermont Yankee and Pilgrim are General Electric (GE) Mark I designs. Both Vermont Yankee and Pilgrim produce approximately the same amount of power. Vermont Yankee and Pilgrim are 41 years old. Vermont Yankee and Pilgrim recently earned NRC license extensions to operate an additional 20 years.

Like Vermont Yankee, Pilgrim has had its share of financial challenges. Pilgrim is experiencing an unusual number of shutdowns: Five shutdowns in the past 15 months, which lowers its capacity factor and increases operating costs.

If Vermont Yankee and Pilgrim profiles are near equal, and if Entergy's press release is accurate, then Pilgrim should be one of the next nuclear plants to retire. Of course, this could be stopped if critical flaws in FERC-regulated markets are addressed and corrected.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication the author held no position in the stocks mentioned.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Energy

More from Energy

Jim Cramer: There's No Stopping the Electric Gold Rush

Jim Cramer
Mar 2, 2021 7:10 AM EST

You can't lip service electric vehicles anymore. Exxon's board moves indicate it knows its gasoline days are numbered.

Is Chevron Finally Ready to Make an Upside Breakout?

Bruce Kamich
Mar 1, 2021 1:44 PM EST

Let's check out some charts on the energy giant.

No Longer an 'Aristocrat,' This Dividend Stock Still Looks Pumped

Bob Ciura
Feb 25, 2021 2:30 PM EST

Suncor Energy has a bruised but energizing 3.0% yield.

As Plug Power Plummets, There Appears to Be More Risk Ahead

Bruce Kamich
Feb 25, 2021 2:03 PM EST

Let's check out the PLUG charts as traders react to the latest EPS numbers.

This Refinery's 5.8% Dividend Yield Is Betting on a Recovery

Bob Ciura
Feb 19, 2021 12:30 PM EST

Valero Energy's dividend has not been cut, despite hard times. There is the possibility for outsized returns from a quicker than anticipated bounce back in demand, but clear risk remains.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 08:50 AM EST PAUL PRICE

    Michaels: Close to a Deal?

    It appears that a deal could be announced soon. ...
  • 08:34 AM EST GARY BERMAN

    Wednesday Morning Fibocall for 3/3/2021

    SPX (Long-Term View) The 20 DMA @ 3889 with the ...
  • 06:05 PM EST PAUL PRICE

    Michael's (MIK) Up on Takeover Rumors

    The NYT says talks are underway regarding a buyout...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2021 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login