• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Energy

Energy Pricing Conflicts

Investment in power plants is being discouraged even though new facilities are desperately needed.
By GLENN WILLIAMS Aug 22, 2011 | 03:00 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: CPN, GEN, DYN

Free markets are wonderful when they work. They are efficient in pricing energy for North America's 10 Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs). But using the same technique to price other utility services has failed and is causing a rift between the states, the federal government and the RTOs.

The RTO market-based approach has failed New Jersey in three ways. First, an RTO is not designed to deliver the best possible price for energy. Second, the RTO's market-based approach for capacity discourages investment. Third, the RTO attempts to preempt states' sovereignty.

RTOs, like PJM Interconnection, determine energy prices using a uniform price auction. In this type of auction, all units are traded at a uniform market-clearing price, where the price for energy will always be pegged at the most expensive resource clearing the auction.

The alternative is used by regulated states where the price for energy is indexed to the auction's average price. The average price will always be lower than the market clearing price and, therefore, regulated states price energy lower than deregulated states.

The state is not the only party affected by PJM's pricing policies. Generators are also squeezed. The market-based approach provides each generator with different gross margins. Those with low production costs will earn the highest gross margins. The energy market ignores the generators' capital costs and punishes the most flexible plants, intermediate and peaking facilities.

To manage the hourly swings, PJM needs intermediate and peaking facilities even though they earn thin gross margins in the energy market. So PJM and other RTOs will pay rent or a capacity payment for their generators who clear a capacity auction (some grids do not pay for capacity). The capacity markets ignore plant efficiencies and reward generators with lower capital costs. Specifically, for a new build, the capacity markets reward gas-guzzling, turbine generators over solar farms.

PJM's market approach toward capacity has two problems. The most troublesome issue is the terms. Most generating assets are 30-to-50 year investments. PJM's commitment is a maximum of three years. In this situation, investors are not hedged; they are being asked to speculate on future capacity auctions. Third-party investors do not speculate on power plants.

The second problem with capacity payments is fungibility. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and PJM's market-based policies assume power plants are fungible. They are not. There are at least five categories of power plants: (1) must-run plants, (2) base-loaded plants, (3) intermediate plants, (4) peaking plants and (5) plants in reserve. These categories rarely compete with each other because they serve different functions. Surprisingly, the FERC and PJM treat these broad classes as if they were fungible commodities. It is a fundamental and unexpected misunderstanding of power plants and commodities.

Capacity auctions reward peaking and reserve plants, which conflicts with energy auctions that reward mostly base-loaded plants. Combining these separate auctions creates a financial mess for generators and for states. As a result, few developers will build new generation in RTO markets.

The only companies that can win in this scheme are independent power producers who own depreciated assets. Even some of these companies struggle to reach the bottom line. Just check the last several quarters for Calpine (CPN), GenON Energy (GEN) and Dynegy (DYN); you will notice horrible earnings.

New Jersey figured this out. In 2010, the state decided to bypass PJM's capacity markets and provide the financial hedge investors had been requesting. According to Reuters, "The state has blamed PJM's capacity and other charges for adding over $1 billion a year to consumers' power costs." Last January, Governor Christie signed a bill providing state-backed, 15-year power purchase agreements for 2,000 new megawatts. That is when the war between New Jersey, PJM and the FERC began.

The FERC immediately tried to scuttle New Jersey's plans by siding with PJM. FERC and PJM argue that New Jersey's building 2,000 new megawatts disturbs PJM's capacity markets and lowers incumbents' gross margins. In addition, the FERC does not want individual states breaking away from federally approved policies.

The state believes that it is their duty to protect their ratepayers. Further, the state does not believe it forfeited its sovereignty when PJM became the regional transmission operator.

This issue is not limited to New Jersey. Reuters reports other states with competitive power markets are watching the battle closely, because they too are struggling to find ways to build new generation.

This issue may reach the crisis stage. The FERC is now in the position of regulating assets that were once in the domain of state utility commissions. States found themselves forfeiting their sovereignty to regulate intrastate commerce. And the markets, as they have been constructed by FERC, are discouraging investment in power plants at a time when new power plants are desperately needed.

 

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Glenn Williams had no position in any of the stocks mentioned.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Energy

More from Energy

See That Down the Road? It's the Big 'Green' Bubble, Ready to Pop

Jim Collins
Jun 24, 2022 1:30 PM EDT

Environmental, social, and corporate governance has created a monster and gullible investors should hit the brakes on their EVs and run from the Washington technocrats while they have the chance.

Weber's Rally Was Cooked Up By the Shorts and Something I Experienced First Hand

Jonathan Heller
Jun 24, 2022 10:00 AM EDT

It should be an interesting ride from here.

Will This Year's Energy and Commodity Trades Become Last Year's Tumbling Tech?

Helene Meisler
Jun 24, 2022 6:00 AM EDT

I can't remember the last time anyone asked me about Apple. No one cares.

Here's What You Need to Know About Investing in Energy

Jim Collins
Jun 23, 2022 1:00 PM EDT

The rudderlessness in DC has created an environment that's downright hostile to domestic exploitation of hydrocarbons.

Occidental Petroleum Could See Its Charts Improve as Buffett Ups His Stake

Bruce Kamich
Jun 23, 2022 8:03 AM EDT

The stock of the oil giant has been sliding of late but should receive a boost as the Oracle of Omaha buys more Oxy shares.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 08:55 AM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    The 10 personality traits of successful traders an...
  • 12:08 PM EDT STEPHEN GUILFOYLE

    Stocks Under $10

    As a Portfolio Name Agrees to a Merger, Here's Our...
  • 10:44 AM EDT PAUL PRICE

    My Very Best Pick for the Next 12 Months

    American Woodmark . It rarely gets better than th...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2022 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login