• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Doug Kass
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Jim Cramer
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Technology

'Patent Trolls' Look to Skin Apple and Others

A federal court ruling keeps Apple's money from patent trolls, but others wait to capitalize on all the tech giants.
By ANDERS KEITZ Aug 02, 2016 | 06:09 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: VHC, BBRY, AAPL, AMZN, GOOGL

Patent trolls have been targeting technology giants for at least a decade, but given the latest patent-infringement case in the courts, it looks as if the trolls won't be able to grab at Apple (AAPL) the way they plucked BlackBerry (BBRY) .

Late Friday, U.S. District Court Judge Robert Schroeder tossed out a verdict that required Apple to pay internet security and technology company VirnetX (VHC) $625.6 million for patent infringement. The judge said it was unfair to Apple that two VirnetX lawsuits had been combined into a single trial, with confusing references to the earlier case resulting in an unfair trial, according to a Reuters report.

VirnetX's cases involved unresolved issues related to damages owed to VirnetX for infringement by Apple's original VPN-on-demand product and an alleged infringement of Apple's original FaceTime product. The judge ordered both cases to be retried separately, with the first beginning Sept. 26.

"My understanding of the VirnetX holding is that it's a procedural holding. That means that it will delay any ability for VirnetX to collect on the verdict, and gives Apple more chances to have the verdict overturned," said University of Pennsylvania law professor Polk Wagner in an email to Real Money.

Apple stock reacted to the ruling, gaining slightly more than 2% on the Friday of the decision and on the following Monday. Apple is a holding in Jim Cramer's Action Alerts PLUS portfolio. 

And this is not the first patent infringement case for the tech giant -- Apple was the subject of 92 lawsuits by patent assertion entities (PAEs) from 2010 to 2013. The Federal Trade Commission labels PAEs, sometimes referred to as "patent trolls," as firms with a business model based primarily on buying patents and then attempting to generate revenue by asserting them against businesses that are already using the patented technologies.

Canada-based BlackBerry was nearly shut down in its prime thanks to another patent troll, NTP, which has mobile email patents. It took legal action against what was then Research In Motion, now known as BlackBerry Ltd. In March 2006, after a five-year legal battle and the possibility of a court-ordered shutdown, Research In Motion agreed to pay $612.5 million to NTP, according to a Wall Street Journal report. The day of the settlement, Research In Motion shares jumped nearly 19% to $85.40 in after-hours trading, the Journal reported.

Now e-commerce giant Amazon (AMZN) is gearing up for several patent cases of its own. In July, two patent infringement cases were filed against Amazon. Virginia Innovation Sciences claims that the online retailer violated several of its patents and demanded a trial by jury. Amazon has been ordered to file its responsive pleadings no later than Sept. 14. And a complaint by Global Equity Management for patent infringement was dismissed Monday.

While one case was dismissed, Amazon still faces other suits. But Chris Versace, co-manager of Growth Seeker, a model portfolio that includes Amazon, said in a phone interview that these patent lawsuits are nothing new for Amazon or the entire smartphone industry.

According to data compiled by Unified Patents -- a self-proclaimed "anti-troll" that collects data and advocates on behalf of patent troll victims -- 2015 saw the most patent disputes in history, the majority (64%) of which involved high-tech patents. That includes fellow tech giant and Action Alerts PLUS holding Alphabet (GOOGL) , which faced suits relating to its Android operating system in 2015. The company has already has seen three patent-infringement complaints just since the beginning of June this year.

The real question, according to Versace, is whether the companies actually violated the patent.

Brooklyn law professor Johnathon Askin said in a phone interview Tuesday that it all comes down to the invention. The patent troll undermines a constitutional mandate for innovation, Askin explained, but noted that the U.S. Patent Office has been trying to make patents more tangible.

"The development of software ideas need to be tethered to hardware," Askin said. He also said  it has become increasingly  difficult for investors to patent certain ideas.

This plays into the notion that there is a greater patent problem in general.

"There are substantial problems with the patent system, mostly surrounding the uncertainty associated with the scope and validity of patents themselves," said Wagner. "This then leads to opportunities for strategic litigation -- sort of like 'slip and fall' type litigation."

While Wagner said this is "not good at all," he added  it is not necessarily suggestive that the system is doomed. But most important, "virtually none of the proposed solutions to the patent troll problem seem at all likely to address the actual problems with the patent system, and indeed seem likely to cause unexpected damage."

Meanwhile, Askin believes  it is "almost inevitable" that some company is going to build a world-changing product and have a patent troll waiting in the wings for it to become valuable and make money off the patent.

So while Apple made it past the latest patent troll, another is likely lurking for opportunities to capitalize.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

Employees of TheStreet are restricted from trading individual securities.

Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust, is long AAPL stock.

Growth Seeker is long AMZN stock.

 

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Technology | Markets

More from Technology

I'm Intrigued by the Recent Pullback in Aurora Mobile

Timothy Collins
Feb 26, 2021 3:30 PM EST

While the Chinese company is still not profitable, it is cash flow positive.

Nvidia's Decline Doesn't Make It a Buying Opportunity - Yet

Bruce Kamich
Feb 26, 2021 7:54 AM EST

NVDA has weakened despite great fundamental numbers.

Remember, This Ain't Noah's 'ARK,' It's Still Just a Leveraged Tech Fund

Timothy Collins
Feb 25, 2021 12:40 PM EST

Let's put ARKK in perspective with TQQQ and QQQ, as we get all the hype about Cathie Wood and the fund's 210% rise.

Here's My Technical View on Advanced Micro Devices

Bruce Kamich
Feb 25, 2021 11:00 AM EST

AMD's near-term price action troubles me.

There's a Green Day Coming in Apple

Mark Sebastian
Feb 24, 2021 1:56 PM EST

These calls are going to end up in the money.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 11:32 AM EST JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    Navigating a Market Correction
  • 11:29 AM EST GARY BERMAN

    Where Does the Nasdaq Go From Here?

    Where does the Nasdaq Composite (CCMP) index go fr...
  • 12:31 PM EST GARY BERMAN

    Has the Short-Term Top Come for the XLF/Banks?

    The has triggered a long-term overbought signal ...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2021 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login