• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Energy

Shorting Tesla's Batteries

The upside seems limited; the downside seems limitless.
By GLENN WILLIAMS Jul 21, 2014 | 03:30 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: GE, SI, HON, TSLA, SCTY, JCI, AMAT, DOW

Corporate managers have an obligation to deploy appropriate technologies. They should avoid falling in love with a particular technology simply because it is interesting, convenient or serves a public interest.

While mature companies such as General Electric (GE), Siemens (SI), Honeywell (HON) and others mastered technology management, others, such as Tesla Motors (TSLA) and SolarCity (SCTY), may be in danger.

The issue is energy storage and batteries. Last February, Tesla announced plans to build the world's largest lithium-ion battery factory. Upon hearing the news, investors flocked to the stock and the company's stock jumped more than 50 points.

Tesla's announcement is a massive bet on a single technology. Worse, its $5 billion wager appears to be based on the assumption that no one can make a meaningful breakthrough in energy storage sciences. It seems like a bad bet.

It turns out that there is a lot of money piling up on the other side of Tesla's bet. Leading research intuitions are investing heavily in new energy storage technologies. In a direct threat to Tesla's battery idea, breakthroughs have already been announced.

Tesla's battery idea centers on lithium-ion technology. The technology stores energy by using chemical reactions to trap ions that move from one electrode to the other. Lithium-ion batteries have huge storage capacities. However, because of the chemistry involved, electricity can go in and out only so fast, and some stored energy is lost in the process.

Lithium-ion batteries have a limited battery life. Their life expectancy is approximately 1,200 cycles at 80% discharge (if batteries are discharged less than 80%, they will last longer). Competing technologies can achieve 8,000 to 10,000 cycles. While lithium-ion prices are expected to decline by 50%, the capital costs are spread over 1,200 cycles.

In addition to deploying batteries in their all-electric automobiles, Tesla plans to use similar batteries in its sister company's (SolarCity) distributed utility systems. Tesla needs the extra business to scale up its manufacturing. Unfortunately, this one-size-fits-all strategy seems double down on Tesla's bet-your-company strategy. However, it is more than betting Tesla's future; it is also betting SolarCity's future.

It is a scary bet. Top tier research intuitions, including the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Stanford, Argonne and others, are jumping in. They see the prize. It is the same prize that Tesla bets can never exist. However, it does exist. While Tesla announces its commitment to lithium-ion batteries, research institutes are announcing new technologies that are entering development stages.

One example is from MIT. Professor Joel Schindall and the MIT Energy Research Council's website are saying goodbye to batteries altogether. They recently announced that their research team has developed a new energy storage device. It "has the potential to hold as much energy as a conventional battery but could be recharged in seconds rather than hours, would last almost indefinitely, and won't mind the cold. The device could prove the first economically viable alternative to today's battery. It could one day yield a practical all-electric car and provide electricity storage critical to using intermittent energy sources such as solar and wind."

On the other coast, Stanford has assembled another impressive team. They established a new battery and energy storage hub they call the Joint Center for Energy Storage Research (JCESR). The hub will combine the research-and-development (R&D) firepower of five Department of Energy (DOE) national laboratories, five universities and four private firms in an effort aimed at achieving revolutionary advances in battery technologies.

The partnership includes Argonne, Lawrence Berkeley, Pacific Northwest, Sandia and SLAC national laboratories. It includes Stanford University, the University of Chicago, Northwestern University, the University of Michigan, the University of Illinois at Chicago and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. It also includes Johnson Controls (JCI), Applied Materials (AMAT), Dow Chemical (DOW) and the Clean Energy Trust.  

There are other teams, like the City University of New York (CUNY), Energy Institute, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Georgia Tech's Center for Innovative Fuel Cell and Battery Technologies and Germany's Münster Electrochemical Energy Technology.

It is a bold move for Tesla to bet against these institutions. It is even bolder when you consider the likelihood that a wave of new technologies will soon emerge.

Of course, Tesla and SolarCity could adopt these new technologies as they become available. But it will cost them. In addition, portions of Tesla's initial $5 billion could be lost, as the new technologies require replacement tools, equipment and feedstock.

For investors, Tesla's bet does not appear to be worth the risks. The upside seems limited. The downside seems limitless. Tesla's risk-reward ratio seems out of balance.

SolarCity has fewer risks but, if it is locked into Tesla's battery deal, its rewards do not appear to be any better.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Williams had no positions in any of the stocks mentioned.

TAGS: Energy | Investing | U.S. Equity

More from Energy

Welcome to Second Semester on Wall Street, Here's How to Make the Grade

Jim Collins
Jul 1, 2022 4:36 PM EDT

Think you can own big tech? You might just get an 'F' for that. Here's what will get you on the other side of this year.

The Market, It's Such a Gas!

Helene Meisler
Jul 1, 2022 6:00 AM EDT

Commodities like gas came down and people finally noticed. Let's check on that diesel, 30-year bonds and more.

Want to Save Your Retirement Fund? Tune Out the Talking Heads

Jim Collins
Jun 30, 2022 3:14 PM EDT

The first half of this year has been ugly. But we could have seen what would happen to Netflix, Tesla and Meta...

OPEC+ Opens the Spigot, but Are We Just Repeating Mistakes of 2008?

Maleeha Bengali
Jun 30, 2022 12:26 PM EDT

As we see this increase in oil production get rubberstamped, we must remember that demand never moves in a straight line.

Commodity Bull Runs Have Proven Unsustainable; Can This Time Be Different?

Carley Garner
Jun 30, 2022 12:00 PM EDT

It's possible, but unlikely, as we've yet to see the commodity complex hold gains forged in a bull market.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 09:49 AM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    Stop Wishing, Hoping, and Praying and Take Control...
  • 07:59 PM EDT PAUL PRICE

    Very Good Quarterly Numbers From Bassett Furniture (BSET)

    Bassett Furniture blew right through analysts es...
  • 04:41 PM EDT PAUL PRICE

    First-Half Results - Putrid; Second Half Results - Likely to Be Much Better

    It's great that we're done with June. 2022 mark...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2022 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login