• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Doug Kass
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Jim Cramer
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Energy

New England's Power Predicament

The region is low on natural resources, power plants and transmission lines.
By GLENN WILLIAMS
Jul 11, 2014 | 01:00 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: ETR, NEE, D

New England is short of energy. The region is low on power plants and transmission lines. That problem may sound simple, but it is not. Regional energy issues are bounded by surprising limitations. In New England's case, limitations are unique and seemingly unresolvable. 

From a macro perspective, New England has two challenges. The first is natural resources. Other than hydroelectric and renewable energy, New England has few to zero natural resources. The region's economy is dependent on energy imports. The region is a net importer of coal, oil, natural gas and electric power.

The second challenge is transportation. New England is a virtual island. Other than Canada, its only neighbor is New York. Unfortunately, New England cannot depend on New York, because New York is also short energy and must import energy from other regions.

At the power level, New England must generate its own or import it from a higher-priced region. Since the region is so dependent on locally generated power, it is troubling to see so many producers exiting.

New England's capacity markets could help solve the problem. Unfortunately, the regional transmission organization, ISO-New England, operates a capacity market that appears to discourage incumbents. Consequently, many power producers of all different types are announcing plans to leave the market.

Entergy's (ETR) Vermont Yankee is an older nuclear power plant, and the company has already announced that plant's early retirement due to grid economics. Entergy's experience does not bode well for companies such as NextEra Energy (NEE) and Dominion Resources (D), who also own major nuclear assets in the same grid. These companies are all struggling to achieve earnings. More are expected to leave. This includes coal, nuclear and oil-fired units.

New England can seek more energy from Canada. In theory, the provinces should not have surplus capacity available. However, they should have surplus energy available from sources that are relatively high up in their economic merit orders. Consequently, any power originating from Canada should be expensive. In addition, because Canada does not have surplus capacity, that energy may not always be available to New England's consumers when needed.

This leads to transmission-line challenges. There are two. New England can build transmission lines internally. In addition, New England could build long lines to Canadian provinces, if they were willing to connect.

Internal lines make the overall system more efficient. New lines reduce the need for new power plant capacity. Over the last several years, southern New England has invested billion in short lines. More investments will continue, but returns are diminishing.

There are already lines connecting New England to Quebec and New Brunswick. Some of those lines are used to help deliver energy to New York City.

If price is not important, adding new capacity from Canadian grids appears to be a solution. However, new transmission lines require years of planning and billions in private investment. It also takes cooperation from several state governments. Sometimes that cooperation is difficult, as local politics can take precedence over regional politics.

Some believe natural gas is the solution. It is not. New pipelines also face economic and right-of-way challenges. Several pipeline companies offered to invest in new capacity. Most withdrew after they failed to secure offtake agreements.

Further challenging natural gas is the view of energy planners, who believe diversity is an important success factor. Today, more than 50% of New England's power originates from natural gas. Increasing that percentage decreases reliability. It also increases pollution.

Planners offer energy efficiency as the ultimate answer. It is. However, ISO-New England conducted an auction, and the market came up short. Surprisingly, not enough resources have been offered. At least not yet.

Finally, energy cannot be viewed in isolation. Energy production is connected to pollution production. In New England, pollution concerns are real, and they are serious. Most of New England's southern states are in serious noncompliance with air quality standards. For example, every county in Massachusetts is in non-attainment for ozone.

It's worse in Connecticut. With four separate pollutants above healthy levels, Connecticut has become a virtual petri dish for lung and related diseases. Adding more pollution from gas turbines makes New England's environmental compliance more challenging.

This leads to nuclear power. Nuclear power is emission-free. Retiring Vermont Yankee, Pilgrim and Millstone exacerbates New England's environmental challenges. The closings create incredible energy and capacity shortages, and as Salem, Mass., learned, they also change transmission-line dynamics.

It seems everything is connected. What is not connected is New England politics.

One mistake is to assume that New England is one cohesive region. It is not. New England is composed of many separate areas, many of which dislike each other. Even within states, there are opposing communities. This might explain why the region is unable to reach one cohesive energy strategy.

If they cannot get their act together, southern and central New England may be facing rolling brownouts. They may also find companies and businesses leaving the region for greener pastures.

Then again, if businesses and their workers leave, New England's power problem has been solved.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.
TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Energy | Utilities | Politics

More from Energy

Jim Cramer: There's No Stopping the Electric Gold Rush

Jim Cramer
Mar 2, 2021 7:10 AM EST

You can't lip service electric vehicles anymore. Exxon's board moves indicate it knows its gasoline days are numbered.

Is Chevron Finally Ready to Make an Upside Breakout?

Bruce Kamich
Mar 1, 2021 1:44 PM EST

Let's check out some charts on the energy giant.

No Longer an 'Aristocrat,' This Dividend Stock Still Looks Pumped

Bob Ciura
Feb 25, 2021 2:30 PM EST

Suncor Energy has a bruised but energizing 3.0% yield.

As Plug Power Plummets, There Appears to Be More Risk Ahead

Bruce Kamich
Feb 25, 2021 2:03 PM EST

Let's check out the PLUG charts as traders react to the latest EPS numbers.

This Refinery's 5.8% Dividend Yield Is Betting on a Recovery

Bob Ciura
Feb 19, 2021 12:30 PM EST

Valero Energy's dividend has not been cut, despite hard times. There is the possibility for outsized returns from a quicker than anticipated bounce back in demand, but clear risk remains.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 06:05 PM EST PAUL PRICE

    Michael's (MIK) Up on Takeover Rumors

    The NYT says talks are underway regarding a buyout...
  • 08:09 AM EST GARY BERMAN

    Monday Morning Fibocall for 3/1/2021

    Always a good idea to know where our bounce zones ...
  • 11:51 AM EST REAL MONEY

    Watch Bob Lang and Doug Kass Discuss Short-Selling!

    Bob Lang and Doug Kass with an engaging and educat...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2021 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login