• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • TheStreet Smarts
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Energy

Duke Energy Remains Highly Charged

North Carolina's Utility Commission has now weighed in on the company's self-inflicted leadership crisis.
By GLENN WILLIAMS Jul 11, 2012 | 03:00 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: DUK

On Tuesday, Duke Energy (DUK) Chairman and CEO Jim Rogers appeared before North Carolina's Utility Commission and answered questions about the ousting of Duke CEO Bill Johnson, which occurred just hours after the company's merger with Progress Energy. We learned two new facts: The company's board lost confidence in Duke's new CEO, Bill Johnson, and the utility commission lost confidence in Duke's newer CEO, Jim Rogers.

The commission had good reason to doubt Rogers, as his testimony painted a confusing picture about the events leading to Johnson's termination. When the testimonial dots are connected, an interesting story emerges.

Rogers had advance warning his board was considering ejecting Johnson at the earliest possible opportunity. On evening of the merger, Duke's new board went into executive session by phone. The members then asked Rogers and Johnson to drop off the line and they voted to push Johnson out (the new board was composed of 11 former Duke directors and seven former Progress directors).

Rogers' explanation for terminating Johnson one hour into his new job was insightful. He claimed it was the board's idea and responsibility, and that he was not directly involved. Each party was operating under contractual agreements; the board was obligated to close the deal and to make Johnson the new CEO. They kept to the contract and Johnson was in fact the new CEO. However, the contract did not stipulate how long he was to be the CEO, so they limited his tenure to a couple of hours.

Rogers testified he felt no obligation to advise the board on extending Johnson's employment for a few weeks or months to give him time to resolve issues. It appears he took a passive-aggressive position, accepted the board's decision without discussion and assumed operational control of the combined company without delay.

Rogers testified that he was asked days in advance if he would be willing to remain as CEO. He also testified he knew his old board had issues with Johnson months before the company merged, but because the new board had yet to convene, technically, the new board's decision about Johnson had not been made.

So, what did Johnson do that was so terrible?

Rogers claims Duke discovered surprising facts about Progress Energy's nuclear power program. He claims the company was shocked by how Progress managed its five nuclear power plants, and had particular concerns about the Crystal River unit located in Florida.

To a casual observer, Rogers' testimony about Progress' nuclear units seemed reasonable. But to those in the nuclear power industry, it was puzzling.

Rogers testified that Duke had undertaken a complete due diligence of Progress' nuclear units and that the company was aware of management challenges. Then, Rogers said Duke discovered surprises associated with Progress' nuclear fleet, which was one of the reasons to demand Johnson's termination. But Rogers later said there were no surprises. A commissioner called Rogers out on the apparent conflicts, whereupon Rogers explained Duke's testimony was always truthful.

Duke couldn't have been surprised over Progress' nuclear units; it's difficult to keep big secrets in an industry that openly shares resources. More to the point, if there was a serious surprise over Progress' nukes, why not terminate the merger agreement?

The real issue was personalities. Rogers offered that clue when he twice testified that Duke's staff became increasingly intimidated by Progress managers. He said Duke's executives became concerned when the prevailing attitude seemed to be that Progress was buying Duke and that the Duke's board of met to discuss and analyze those concerns.

Rogers's testimony paints a troubling picture for the new Duke Energy, which suggests Duke's board is split along legacy lines and that Rogers hasn't earned the respect of all his board members. It also suggests that senior executives below Rogers are split (three former Progress executives just quit). Rogers and the new board will have many challenges facing them as they struggle to build one cohesive organization.

Yesterday's interaction with North Carolina's regulators was Duke's first step. The company must take many more before it can restore the trust and confidence of the North Carolina, South Carolina and Florida regulators.

It appears almost certain Duke may face regulatory blowback, particularly in future rate cases before these same commissioners. Earnings may suffer.

In the end, Duke's shareholders will be fine. But a new board and a new CEO without legacy backgrounds could accelerate the company's healing process.

You can follow Glenn on Twitter: http://twitter.com/glennskwilliams.

At the time of publication, Glenn Williams had no positions in any of the stocks mentioned.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Glenn Williams had no positions in any of the stocks mentioned.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Energy

More from Energy

The Pendulum Swings Back, but Don't Look for Things to Stabilize

Peter Tchir
Aug 15, 2022 11:00 AM EDT

It could swing past the point where things look normal or OK to a point where things look bad again.

Where Are Crude Prices Heading, and Could They Clog Up a Recovery?

Bruce Kamich
Aug 12, 2022 11:00 AM EDT

Let's check the charts to see where we can expect oil prices to flow.

PPI Cools, Home Prices Don't, Fed in the Dark, Technical Battle Lines, Chevron

Stephen Guilfoyle
Aug 12, 2022 7:29 AM EDT

Just when is the Federal Reserve going to reduce the cash slosh, anyway?

This New Energy Fund Sounds Dirty, But Could Help Investors Clean Up

Mark Abssy
Aug 11, 2022 1:33 PM EDT

The Strive U.S. Energy exchange-traded fund is billed as an anti-ESG ETF. Let's see how it stacks up against the similar Energy Select SPDR Fund.

CorEnergy Is a Pipeline to High Yield

Jim Collins
Aug 11, 2022 1:15 PM EDT

It's the best of both worlds, a hydrocarbon company that also has a green component.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 10:24 AM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    To Improve Your Trading and Investing, Spend More ...
  • 08:44 AM EDT PETER TCHIR

    CPI Beats Expectations, But Maybe Not the 'Whisper'?

    Slightly better-than-expected inflation across the...
  • 01:44 PM EDT STEPHEN GUILFOYLE

    This Holding Lights Up With Strong Earnings

    Check out the latest from TheStreet's Stocks Under...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2022 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login