• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Energy

China Resumes Nuclear Build Out

The nation plans to have 100 operational nuclear reactors by 2020.
By GLENN WILLIAMS Jun 18, 2012 | 05:00 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: SO, SCG, DUK, NEE

After Fukushima, China halted its nuclear power construction program, believing it prudent to reassess strategies and affirm whether nuclear power is appropriate. Apparently, the assessment is complete, and China is moving forward with an ambitious nuclear construction program.

When it comes to energy, context is important. The context for China is the nation's need to maintain a competitive advantage. Keeping production costs to a minimum will help in this regard.

It appears as though China is refocusing on production costs and rethinking environmental costs. Using coal and natural gas to fuel the nation's power industry simply costs too much, and threatens China's competitive position.

The numbers tell the story. It appears that China is paying over $6 per 1 million British thermal units (MMBtu) for delivered thermal coal. In contrast, U.S. utilities pay approximately $2 per MMBtu for the same coal. If accurate, these numbers suggest that China's production costs are approximately $55 per megawatt-hour for an average coal plant, while that same plant in the U.S. is approximately $20 per megawatt-hour. China's coal position is not competitive.

The situation is worse with natural gas. In Asia, the marginal price for natural gas was recently priced in excess of $18 per MMBtu vs. $2.50 per MMBtu for the U.S. These numbers suggest that China's average gas turbine has a production cost of approximately $125 per megawatt-hour, while that same plant in the U.S. is producing approximately $18 per megawatt-hour. China's natural gas position is uncompetitive.

China has a problem. I'll leave macroeconomic analysis to my wiser colleagues, but if China doesn't change course, it will be left behind.

China has only four practical options, and it appears as though the nation has selected all four. The most important is energy efficiency, which includes smart-grid technologies and demand-response programs. Energy efficiency has negative production costs, and it is the low-hanging fruit for any nation, including China.

The next bargain is renewable energy. Production costs for wind and solar are near zero. Unfortunately, these resources are not dispatchable, and they aren't a reliable source for China's base loads. But, solar is an excellent peaking generator, and it can displace natural gas.

The third is hydroelectric, a controversial source of renewable energy. Some hydroelectric is dispatchable, and its production costs are low (albeit not zero). Geography and geology limit the number and location of hydroelectric resources.

The fourth is nuclear power, which has a production cost of approximately $22 per megawatt-hour. As a bonus, nuclear power is carbon-free, while coal and natural gas power plants are choking China's skies.

For China, energy efficiency, renewable and hydroelectric power aren't enough. That's why nuclear power is so important. For China, nuclear energy provides safe, economic and reliable sources of power.

This may explain why Fuel Cycle Week's Dan Yurman recently reported that the Chinese government just made two big decisions:

First, it announced the release of a long-awaited safety plan that will result in the lifting of a moratorium on new nuclear reactor projects. Second, it announced approval of an IPO by China National Nuclear Power, the country's largest reactor developer, to raise the equivalent of $27.3 billion.

Yurman goes on to say that China's list of new nuclear stations total 77 reactors or 86,000 megawatts of new power production. This is huge. To reduce risks and costs, China appears to be relying on several designs, but two dominate the discussions.

The first is the CPR-1000, a pressurized water reactor based on a French 900-megawatt design. The Chinese improved the design to increase the capacity to 1,000 megawatts and stretch the operating life to 60 years. So far, 15 are under construction and 13 more are planned.

The second is the AP1000, originally designed by Westinghouse, a unit of Toshiba. China's AP1000 is similar, but not exactly the same as the AP1000's planned for Southern's (SO) new Vogtle units and SCANA's (SCG) new V.C. Summer units. In addition, Duke Energy (DUK) and Next Era Energy (NEE) selected AP1000s for their proposed units. Nevertheless, lessons learned in China will be helpful in the U.S. China has four AP1000s under construction, and 15 more are planned.

Yurman reports that China plans to have 100 operational nuclear reactors by 2020, which could make it the biggest buyer of uranium in the world. It would also be the fastest nuclear build in the history of the industry.

It's not just China. Fuel Cycle Week is also reporting that Westinghouse is negotiating project development agreements to construct more AP1000s with a state-run utility in India.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Glenn Williams had no positions in the stocks mentioned. He also has no association with Fuel Cycle Week.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Energy

More from Energy

See That Down the Road? It's the Big 'Green' Bubble, Ready to Pop

Jim Collins
Jun 24, 2022 1:30 PM EDT

Environmental, social, and corporate governance has created a monster and gullible investors should hit the brakes on their EVs and run from the Washington technocrats while they have the chance.

Weber's Rally Was Cooked Up By the Shorts and Something I Experienced First Hand

Jonathan Heller
Jun 24, 2022 10:00 AM EDT

It should be an interesting ride from here.

Will This Year's Energy and Commodity Trades Become Last Year's Tumbling Tech?

Helene Meisler
Jun 24, 2022 6:00 AM EDT

I can't remember the last time anyone asked me about Apple. No one cares.

Here's What You Need to Know About Investing in Energy

Jim Collins
Jun 23, 2022 1:00 PM EDT

The rudderlessness in DC has created an environment that's downright hostile to domestic exploitation of hydrocarbons.

Occidental Petroleum Could See Its Charts Improve as Buffett Ups His Stake

Bruce Kamich
Jun 23, 2022 8:03 AM EDT

The stock of the oil giant has been sliding of late but should receive a boost as the Oracle of Omaha buys more Oxy shares.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 12:10 AM EDT PAUL PRICE

    More Insider Buying in American Woodmark (AMWD)

    American Woodmark , which I've discussed here fr...
  • 08:55 AM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    The 10 personality traits of successful traders an...
  • 12:08 PM EDT STEPHEN GUILFOYLE

    Stocks Under $10

    As a Portfolio Name Agrees to a Merger, Here's Our...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2022 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login