• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Financial Services

Jim Cramer: The Real Reason Banks Aren't Rallying

There's more holding back bank shares than a flat yield curve.
By JIM CRAMER Jun 15, 2018 | 02:54 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: C, JPM, GS, SHLD, JCP, PYPL, MC, V, AXP, BAC, SQ

Are the big banks, department stores, and the fintechs FANG? I have spent hours this week analyzing the failure of the banks to generate any sort of rally in the face of the Fed blessing four rate hikes instead of three. It's a total conundrum because had we known there would be four rate hikes even a couple of quarters ago the banks would be among the best performers.

What's happening here?

Let me give you the conventional wisdom first. The yield curve is flat so banks don't make as much lending as we thought they would. I wouldn't mind this analysis except lending rates aren't as consistently priced off the 10-year as they used to be. There's more variability there than people realize.

Second, mortgage loans have tailed off because of the rise in rates. I get that, always a possibility. But a bank like Citigroup (C) , which is the worst performer of the majors, doesn't have a lot of mortgage business as a percentage of its entire enterprise.

Third, we are waiting for CCAR before the traditional third-quarter romp. I have been keying off this theory as a reason to hang on to the banks. The charitable trust owns Citigroup, JP Morgan (JPM) and Goldman Sachs (GS) and I expect all to be beneficiaries of CCAR.

Plus, for me, the net interest margin, what they make on your deposits, is huge here as CDs haven't kept up with the short rates at all. That's risk-free money, the best kind. The book values for the banks are very high as a percentage of the stock prices and the P/E multiples are lower than any sector in the entire market save the autos.

So what else can it be?

As I wrack my brain I come up with one plausible -- and existential --answer. There are plenty of younger portfolio managers who think the banks are like Sears (SHLD) and JC Penney (JCP) : they are old-line brick and mortar stores that are about to lose their relevance to all sorts of new technologies from bitcoin to blockchain to Paypal (PYPL) and Square SQ. Meanwhile, SOFI is taking millennials right out of college and turning them into 360 degree clients. At the same time the big cap growth in the sector belongs to the giant but boring fintechs, chiefly Mastercard (MC) , Visa (V) and American Express (AXP) .

Now the latter three, to me, are simply the big cap places to hide to be equal weighted in a very important sector of the S&P so you can avoid owning the traditional because they are a play, still, on paper going to plastic, globally as well as small business growth.

But the others? They are about obviating the banks altogether. Of these my favorite is Paypal because not only is it the mobile bank but it is also the millennial social bank courtesy of its emoji filled Venmo cash sharing economy division. Paypal's Dan Schulman, the charismatic leader of the online banking company that cooperates with pretty much everyone and has gone global in a big way, represents the Amazon of banking. Not only are there no brick and mortar costs, but it is the international bank to the unbanked, about two billion people without bank access right now. At one point Citigroup seemed to be taking on that role but it has pulled back and it is no longer a tech leader. Bank of America (BAC) has the best omnichannel so to speak but it pales compared to PayPal.

Square (SQ) is ingenious small business lending and it has come on strong as a tech leader but it is expensive as an abettor to small business growth as anyone in the market can tell you.

Then there are the existential threats: blockchain, which would, some think, possibly end the banks' hegemony over stock clearing and cryptocurrencies which are the populist insurgents of the movement.

All of these challenges resonate particularly with the younger portfolio manager crowd. Suffice it to say they are winning right now. They, to me, are the true reasons for the underperformance and until the banks regain some earnings momentum that's visible and powerful these forces aren't going to be reversed and represent a true threat to the ultimate valuation of the group.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust, was long C, JPM, GS and PYPL.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Financial Services | Economy | Jim Cramer | Stocks

More from Financial Services

The Best House in This Neighborhood Is on Sale

Brad Ginesin
Jun 24, 2022 12:15 PM EDT

The buying opportunity here below book value is compelling.

Affirm: Will Investors Buying Now, Pay for It Later?

Bruce Kamich
Jun 22, 2022 3:12 PM EDT

Let's see what the charts and indicators suggest.

American International Is Breaking a Longer-Term Uptrend Line

Bruce Kamich
Jun 13, 2022 1:51 PM EDT

Is there more risk than reward?

Investors Are Losing Interest in Mortgage Lenders as Interest Rates Rise

Ed Ponsi
Jun 9, 2022 8:30 AM EDT

The charts of a number of the nation's largest mortgage lenders indicate more pain to come for holders of those stocks.

Looking to Lehman for Lessons About Today

Ed Ponsi
Jun 2, 2022 10:00 AM EDT

Let's review what happened to this financial giant in 2008 and what it could tell investors about the current market.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 12:04 AM EDT PAUL PRICE

    Two Good Signs -- Especially for Small-Cap Investors

  • 12:10 AM EDT PAUL PRICE

    More Insider Buying in American Woodmark (AMWD)

    American Woodmark , which I've discussed here fr...
  • 08:55 AM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    The 10 personality traits of successful traders an...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2022 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login