• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Doug Kass
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Jim Cramer
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / ETFs

Are Moving Averages Really That Simple? Let's Conduct an Experiment

A buy-and-hold strategy for the S&P 500.
By TIMOTHY COLLINS
Jun 14, 2016 | 11:59 AM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: SPY, RSP, RSP

Technicians often talk about moving averages. Ten-day, 20-day, 50-day, 200-day, etc. I mean, we could just sit here and list a bunch of numbers, whether Fibonacci-related or round numbers and talk about their significance. Bob Byrne and I often mention to each other about how bad things happen under the 50-day simple moving average (SMA), so I thought I'd take a look at a more basic approach.

How would a trader do if they simply put $1,000 into every stock in the S&P 500 over or under the 50-day SMA and held for either one month or six months? There are no stop losses, no profit taking, no scaling, no adding, nothing. This is just buy and hold on the same day and sell exactly one month or six months later, but only for the stocks in the S&P 500 index. I did not factor commissions into this exercise either, although it is something one would have to consider.

Heading into this exercise, I assumed a trader would perform better buying stocks above the 50-day SMA rather than below the SMA. While one shouldn't have a conclusion before looking at the data, I do think it is important to note your expectations and compare them with the facts.

The split between stocks above and below their 50-day SMA one month ago was fairly even, with 260 above and 241 below. Yes, that makes for more than 500, but remember indexes do have changes over time. From those stocks trading above the 50-day SMA, 172 (66.15%) found their share price higher one month later while 88 (33.85%) were lower.

50-day SMA, One Month
View Chart » View in New Window »

Comparing this to buying below the 50-day yielded a surprising result. Some 159 stocks that were trading under their 50-day SMA were actually higher one month later, while only 82 were lower. That translated to 65.98% higher and 34.02% lower. From a binary standpoint of either winner or loser, the percentages were almost exactly the same. In simpler terms, you basically had the same odds to make a profit or loss from a random purchase in either category. Of course, this speaks nothing to how big or small of a loss you might see, but it is an interesting note.

Ironically, in terms of average gains, while both returns were greater than either the S&P 500 ETF (SPY) or the Guggenheim S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP), the stocks below their 50-day SMA significantly outperformed stocks that were trading above it. The biggest seven risers and three largest losers were all found in the group trading under the 50-day SMA, so the next area one might check is the volatility in the group under the 50-day SMA. This is only one sample, but that fact is worth investigating further.

When we scale out to six months, we find a much larger sample size of 356 names below their 50-day SMA. Consistent with the one-month group, 239, or 67.13%, of these names found themselves trading higher after six months. The smaller sample size of 142 names trading above their 50-day SMA found only 60.56% trading higher after six months. While the group trading above their 50-day SMA six months ago did manage to outgain the SPY, a purchase of RSP would have returned almost 1% more. The biggest gains again were found in buying the names that had been trading under their 50-day SMA six months ago. A possible reversion to the mean or catch-up trade thesis, perhaps? The sub-50-day SMA again contained the seven biggest losers and 11 out of 12 of the biggest movers. The increased-volatility idea is starting to pick up speed in my view and will be worth a closer look moving forward.

50-day SMA, Six Months
View Chart » View in New Window »

While a small sample size, the results are enough to warrant further investigation. My ongoing thesis would conclude buying above or below the 50-day SMA doesn't change my chances of a pure profit or loss (binary measurement) much, but if I'm willing to tolerate greater volatility, my chances for bigger gains may come from the stocks trading under their 50-day SMA. Again, this would just be a thesis to pursue, not an actual conclusion, as I would need to include many additional data points. Just a little food for thought as we head into the summer doldrums.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Collins had no positions in the stocks mentioned.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | ETFs | Funds

More from ETFs

Remember Palladium? A Close Look at the Other Precious Metal

Bruce Kamich
Apr 8, 2021 11:19 AM EDT

Sometimes the most rewarding trading strategies are found away from all the shouting.

With Gasoline Back to $3 at the Pump Let's Check Out the XLE

Bruce Kamich
Apr 2, 2021 12:00 PM EDT

Let's review the charts and indicators.

Novice Trade: SLV Silver ETF

Mark Sebastian
Mar 31, 2021 2:49 PM EDT

Silver has taken a hit of late, but we should see buyers start to step in.

Here's Why I'm Looking at the AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF

Timothy Collins
Mar 31, 2021 1:10 PM EDT

There is plenty of upside for a trade, but I think MSOS is a long-term buy and hold as well.

Here's My Reply to a Subscriber Who Asked About the ARK Innovation ETF

Bruce Kamich
Mar 31, 2021 10:18 AM EDT

ARKK has produced impressive gains but it looks like it is still in a correction phase. Here's what aggressive traders could do.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 04:44 PM EDT PAUL PRICE

    Pretty Incredible + Hard to Believe

  • 11:18 AM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    The 5 Pillars of Exceptional Trading
  • 08:05 AM EDT BOB LANG

    Bitcoin vs. Gold: Which Should You Invest In Now?

    Read my article TheStreet here!
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2021 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login