• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Energy

The EPA Shifts Utilities' Energy Incentives

Nuclear power gets a boost while coal and natural gas get punished.
By GLENN WILLIAMS Jun 09, 2014 | 05:00 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: EXC, ETR, FE

The government has two tools it can use to incentivize energy production. One is to offer tax and financial incentives to motivate investments in favored technologies. The other is to punish competitors so that favored technologies can win.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is using the second tool. It appears that the agency is punishing coal and natural gas. As a result, states may reward nuclear power. However, nuclear's success may come at a price.

It is about cost leadership. Cost leaders always win in power markets. For decades, Harvard Business School's Michael Porter argued that cost leaders have the competitive advantage.

In the wholesale markets, energy efficiency, solar and wind are the cost leaders. The reason is simple: Their production costs are zero or near zero.

On the other end of the spectrum is petroleum, which has been and will remain in last place. Because petroleum-fueled power plants cannot compete, these units rarely operate. They are useful only to provide grids with reserve margins. That is, oil-fired power plants are idle until there is rare enough demand for the market to pay outrageously high prices for their power.

This leaves the middle ground. Porter warned that the middle ground is a tough position for competitors. It is the domain of nuclear power, natural gas and coal. When natural gas was cheap, gas-fired power plants led this group. When gas prices jumped, coal became the leader. Mixed in were nuclear power plants.

After the EPA announced its new carbon regulations, the dynamics within this middle group changed. Now, state regulators will likely seek methods to punish oil and gas. Some states may join Florida, Georgia and South Carolina and reward nuclear power, which is carbon-free.

Because nuclear power displaces carbon, a nuclear plant suddenly becomes a strategic option for state policymakers. Its presence means that the state has reliable sources of power without the usual air emissions. Its loss means the state must authorize more carbon production, hope demand drops or watch the system lose reliability.

For the middle ground, it appears that nuclear has become a leader. States will realize that nuclear power offers them some environmental attributes they had previously ignored. This is better news for companies such as Exelon (EXC), Entergy (ETR) First Energy (FE) and other nuclear owners. All of a sudden, their nuclear assets are repositioned into the leadership position, at least within the middle ground.

The only question is timing. Will states implement the EPA's new rules in time to save the 10 or 20 nuclear units that are on the precipice of retirement?

In all likelihood, the answer is both no and yes. It will be a no for units that are already retired. It will also be a no for Entergy's Vermont Yankee and Exelon's Oyster Creek, which already have firm commitments to retire early. It also may be a no for Entergy's Indian Point, which New York State is trying to close because it is too close to New York City.

It may be yes for other units. Illinois may try to save its nuclear plants in order to assure reliability, jobs and tax base. The EPA's new regulations give states added incentives to motivate Exelon and other nuclear utilities to keep nuclear plants operating. By keeping nuclear plants operating, states push carbon out of the power markets and out of their states.

Illinois appears to be a bellwether. Exelon is asking state policymakers for economic incentives to prevent early retirement of several units. Since new rules are on the horizon, Illinois may need the nuclear option to help it attain the EPA's new air quality standards.

Illinois may not be alone. Other states may join in. New Jersey and Maryland may attempt to modify their restructuring policies and keep nuclear power as an option.

Yes, it is a reach. Restructuring is an all-or-nothing proposition. If nuclear power is allowed back into the rate base, or if it is provided financial guarantees, other independent power producers will want similar incentives. States will have to walk a fine line by incentivizing one form of energy while punishing another form.

Nevertheless, the facts changed. States' response to those facts will also change. Nuclear power may get a second wind. Nuclear utilities may be in a stronger position than previously thought.

Natural gas may not be the silver bullet that many expected for the power industry. In addition, coal may exit the power markets much faster than many expected..

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Glenn Williams had no position in any of the stocks mentioned.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Energy | Utilities

More from Energy

An Oil Spill on Wall Street

Helene Meisler
Jul 6, 2022 6:00 AM EDT

All those bearish energy charts that I have been harping on finally fell. Let's check under the hood ... and see where the dripping is coming from.

What's the Next Move for Crude Oil?

Bruce Kamich
Jul 5, 2022 3:30 PM EDT

A temporary break in oil prices, along with lower interest rates, could be a near-term positive for equity prices.

As Oil Hits the Fan, I See a Trading Opportunity

Mark Sebastian
Jul 5, 2022 2:48 PM EDT

Let's look at how to play Devon right now.

Exxon Mobil Could See Its Shares Decline Even Further

Bruce Kamich
Jul 5, 2022 10:40 AM EDT

Let's check out the charts.

This Energy Play Should Turn Out A-'OKE'

Bret Jensen
Jul 3, 2022 7:30 AM EDT

Let's learn how to make an enhanced yield trade in Oneok.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 12:01 PM EDT PAUL PRICE

    A Recent Director Buy in Children's Place (PLCE)

    Four of the most recent insider trades in Children...
  • 07:34 AM EDT PAUL PRICE

    A $525,000 Vote of Confidence on Macerich (MAC)

  • 09:49 AM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    Stop Wishing, Hoping, and Praying and Take Control...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2022 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login