• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Doug Kass
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Jim Cramer
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / U.S. Equity

Why I'm Still Bullish on Homebuilders

The housing recovery still has a long way to go.
By MIKE NORMAN Jun 02, 2016 | 01:00 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: LEN, BZH, PHM, KBH, TOL

Since I have been contributing here on Real Money for the past three years and even before that, I have said housing starts would have to rise to at least 1.5 million units annually, if not more, to provide enough housing supply to curtail further sharp price increases and to cool off the current building boom.

That 1.5 million annual start figure was the average over the past 40 years. In between, we've seen it jump as high as 2.5 million in 1972 and 2.3 million in 2006. Both times precipitated a housing market correction because of inventory oversupply. However, at 1.17 million annually, which is where we are today, starts are nowhere near where they need to be. That's because with population growth, family formation and normal aging of the housing stock, we need more supply.

At a 1.5 million annual rate of housing starts, it takes approximately 75 years to entirely turn over the nation's housing stock. That would be what we'd consider normal. America would look like America in the sense that most of the housing stock would be relatively new or in good repair.

However, in the depths of the financial crisis back in 2009, starts fell to below 500,000 annually. At that rate, it would take 225 years to replace the nation's housing stock. If left at that rate, it would mean totally inadequate supply, dilapidated structures everywhere and blighted communities one after another. America would look like an economically challenged Third World country.

Clearly, prices had to rise and the rise reflected the "replacement cost" of lost housing. That has been happening.

For all the people who supposedly "called" the housing crash, the recovery has gone on a lot longer than the crash and so has the rebound in prices. Some of those people are still calling the crash, which is comical. It's like so many of the "short sellers" or stock market "permabears." They never seem to tell you when to get back in on the long side ('cause they never go long).

The housing recovery still has a long way to go and that's one of the reasons I am still bullish on homebuilders. I would be even more bullish if not for the fact that many people are still having trouble qualifying for mortgages. This has been one of the negative outcomes from the financial crisis and it has been a hindrance to further building activity. Demand could be stronger, but it's tempered by lack of adequate financing.

It's interesting to note that back in 1972, the population of the United States was 200 million. Back then, banks were highly regulated, "plain vanilla" institutions that made mortgage loans, held those mortgages, serviced them, etc. Even so, with those supposed "constraints," we built 2.5 million new homes.

In 2006, banks were no longer subject to Glass-Steagall, loans were bundled, securitized, sold off, we had 300 million in population and guess what? We built 2.3 million homes. So what was accomplished? Not much; just a lot more intermediation and injection of risk. Anyone who says it's a better system today, well, I really question that view. Less real capital, more risk? What's so great about that?

As for the homebuilders, I like Lennar (LEN), Beazer (BZH), Pulte (PHM), KB Home (KBH), Toll Brothers (TOL) and D.R. Horton (DHI). But stick with the ones that pay dividends. Pulte is probably your best choice.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of disclosure, Norman was long LEN, BZH and PHM, although positions may change at any time.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity

More from U.S. Equity

A 'Simple' Way to Play for the Rally to Resume

Mark Sebastian
Mar 2, 2021 3:23 PM EST

I believe we are heading to new all-time highs, potentially this week.

Jim Cramer: What History Tells Us About Bond-Rate Scares Like This

Jim Cramer
Feb 27, 2021 2:01 PM EST

We could have some real pain ahead for some stocks. Five different kinds.

What's Next for the Markets? What the Charts and Data Reveal

Guy Ortmann
Feb 26, 2021 11:14 AM EST

The Rydex Ratio has turned neutral but insider buying remains absent.

Here's the Boeing Trade I Made Today

Timothy Collins
Feb 24, 2021 12:06 PM EST

I love this chart and I'm woefully underexposed in this area.

A Market Bounce Has the Potential to Fail

Guy Ortmann
Feb 24, 2021 10:52 AM EST

Insiders are increasing selling activity.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 08:50 AM EST PAUL PRICE

    Michaels: Close to a Deal?

    It appears that a deal could be announced soon. ...
  • 08:34 AM EST GARY BERMAN

    Wednesday Morning Fibocall for 3/3/2021

    SPX (Long-Term View) The 20 DMA @ 3889 with the ...
  • 06:05 PM EST PAUL PRICE

    Michael's (MIK) Up on Takeover Rumors

    The NYT says talks are underway regarding a buyout...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2021 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login