• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Doug Kass
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Jim Cramer
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Markets

Applying 'Residual Seasonality' to GDP Doesn't Do Any Good

Adjustment can only help spread incorrect data.
By ROGER ARNOLD May 27, 2015 | 04:06 PM EDT

Continuing with yesterday's commentary on "residual seasonality" being applied to GDP measures, there are a few more observations I will make before discussing the potential capital market response to these actions, which I will discuss tomorrow.

The immediate catalyst for residual seasonality to become an issue was not the fact that the professional economists so badly missed the mark for first-quarter GDP, offering public estimations that it would come in at about 2% before the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) estimated it to be 0.2%.

It was because the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta's GDPNow model much more accurately forecast, well in advance, that the BEA would announce a 0.1% annualized rate of growth for Q1. 

The importance of this is that the GDPNow model is designed specifically to mirror the BEA model using publicly available data. The reason for structuring the model this way and to provide the estimates and methodology publicly is to prove that it is possible to accurately forecast the BEA's GDP estimate without the BEA's proprietary data and that there is no reason for the private-sector economists and Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) members to be so consistently wrong.

I wrote about this issue last July in the column, "The Rise of 'Nowcasting' Economic Activity," following the Atlanta Fed's announcement that it would start to release the GDPNow forecasts publicly.

The GDPNow model, in other words, is not a system for estimating GDP. It's a system for estimating what the BEA will state the GDP is.

That makes it very different from the GDPplus model created by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. 

That model enhances the BEA model in an attempt to more accurately forecast what GDP is, rather than what the BEA will announce it to be.

This distinction is important because although the GDPplus model implies a Q1 2015 annualized rate of growth in GDP of 1.8%, which is very close to the consensus of 2% offered by the private-sector economists, the two groups perform different functions.

The purpose of private-sector publicly offered forecasts is to anticipate the BEA's announcement, not to independently offer a competing or alternative narrative.

The bottom line is that the private-sector forecasts are wrong and have been consistently wrong for many years. Applying a residual seasonality adjustment to the BEA's data and conclusions doesn't change that. In fact, it makes the BEA model less public and more proprietary, and thus less predictable.

We'll have to wait until July 30 to find out how much of the new system for calculating GDP by the BEA will be made public.

There is, however, another big problem with this issue for monetary policy and the potential for rate hikes by the Fed.

The residual seasonality adjustment doesn't just cause Q1 figures to be revised upward, it causes the figures for the other three quarters to be revised downward. It is a means of smoothing the cyclicality of quarter-to-quarter differences.

The reason this is important now is that the second-quarter 2015 GDPNow forecast, at 0.8% annualized, is well below the historical average of the past 30 years of about 3.3% and of the past 15 years of about 2.85%.

That rebound is absent this year and is almost certainly independent of any residual seasonality.

The second quarter on average has the highest GDP measure of all four quarters, and yet this quarter the estimated rate of growth is not only substantially below the historical average, it's also below the estimate for this year's Q1 growth at the same point in the quarter. 

If the current GDPNow forecast of 0.8% holds, although applying a residual seasonality adjustment to Q1 will cause the figure to increase, applying it to Q2 could cause it to show a contraction.

However, even if it doesn't show a contraction as having started, it will clearly indicate, at the very least, that a substantial deceleration in economic activity is under way at the same time the Federal Reserve is trying desperately to create an economic logic narrative that justifies raising interest rates.  

That justification, for the past six months, has been grounded in the Fed's repeatedly offered assessment that the lack of growth in economic activity is transitory and the unemployment rate has been falling.

If Q2 GDP growth comes in near Q1's and well below the historical average for Q2, the Fed will be hard pressed to continue to pursue that line of reasoning.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Arnold had no positions in the stocks mentioned.

TAGS: Markets

More from Markets

Bearish Bets: 2 Nasdaq Stocks You Should Consider Shorting This Week

Bob Lang
Feb 28, 2021 10:30 AM EST

These names are displaying both quantitative and technical deterioration.

Jim Cramer: What History Tells Us About Bond-Rate Scares Like This

Jim Cramer
Feb 27, 2021 2:01 PM EST

We could have some real pain ahead for some stocks. Five different kinds.

Navigating a Market Correction

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
Feb 27, 2021 10:00 AM EST

The most critical factor in long-term market success is the ability to effectively navigate market corrections.

Kass: Time to Introduce a Financial Transaction Tax and End Weekly Stock Options

Doug Kass
Feb 27, 2021 8:15 AM EST

I believe more sensible regulations should be considered and enforcement is needed to adapt to gains in technology.

Corrective Action Produces Fading Confidence and Technical Damage

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
Feb 26, 2021 5:08 PM EST

It's dangerous to have too much exposure now, but the potential for a good recovery is there once interest rate issues are digested.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 11:51 AM EST REAL MONEY

    Watch Bob Lang and Doug Kass Discuss Short-Selling!

    Bob Lang and Doug Kass with an engaging and educat...
  • 11:32 AM EST JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    Navigating a Market Correction
  • 11:29 AM EST GARY BERMAN

    Where Does the Nasdaq Go From Here?

    Where does the Nasdaq Composite (CCMP) index go fr...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2021 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login