• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • TheStreet Smarts
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Financial Services

Deutsche Bank Scares You?!? OMG, You MUST Read This!!!

It isn't Deutsche Bank's derivatives exposure but its low profitability that should really scare you.
By ANTONIA OPRITA May 26, 2016 | 10:00 AM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: DB, JPM

OK, I admit the headline is a bit of a con. I don't have any earth-shattering revelations about Deutsche Bank (DB), so if that's what you're after, close your browser window now.

What I am looking at in this article is the reason why Deutsche Bank sometimes is, for a trading room, the equivalent of shouting "fire" in a crowded theatre. Is it because of its derivatives exposure? Is it because of its debt? Is it because of its stock performance? Let's see...

The derivatives issue seems to be the one that sparks the worst fears, so let's focus on that for now. Back in February of this year, Zero Hedge ran a story helpfully headlined: "Is It Time to Panic About Deutsche Bank?". It basically quoted another article by the same blog, from April 2013, which said Deutsche Bank's exposure to derivatives was the largest in the world, at $72.8 billion. The problem is that that's gross exposure, not net, and therefore it is not really that scary.

The article does explain about netting lower down --- offsetting positive and negative exposures against each other -- but does it in quite a dismissive way, saying that netting works in theory, but in practice it might not. That may be so, but in that case this is a problem for all banks. JPMorgan (JPM), for instance, was at the time the second-largest holder of derivatives in the world, not far behind Deutsche, with $69.5 trillion worth of the stuff in gross exposure.

To put things in perspective, total outstanding derivatives contracts in the world were $700 trillion at their peak in 2012 and are worth more than $500 trillion currently. That's according to Bank for International Settlements (BIS) figures quoted by John Kay in a Financial Times article debunking the myth of gross exposure to derivatives.

OK, these figures are huge (world GDP in 2013 was $75.59 trillion in nominal terms, according to World Bank data) so why hasn't Deutsche Bank (and JPMorgan, and all the other big banks for that matter) collapsed yet? Well, there's the effect of netting. This basically means that for every derivative position, the bank also holds a position the other way, and they roughly cancel each other out.

In other words, if banks bet that a certain price will increase by 10%, at the same time they bet that it will decrease by the same percentage. The net result of the position is zero. There are of course some differences, as banks usually seek to gain from exploiting price differences between positions, but these are not that significant.

Let's take the latest data in Deutsche Bank's annual report for 2015. It shows that the bank's total, notional exposure to derivatives transactions is 41.9 trillion euros ($46.8 trillion). While that's more than 35% lower than its 2013 exposure, it still looks huge.

However, after offsetting the positive and negative exposures against each other, the net exposure is a much more manageable 18.2 billion euros ($20.3 billion).

A look at JPMorgan's annual report for 2015 shows that actually, the U.S. bank has overtaken Deutsche Bank and now has world's biggest exposure to derivatives, worth $50.6 trillion. Incidentally, that's not because JPMorgan's exposure has been rising, but because Deutsche's has been falling faster.

Again, JPMorgan's figure, in the tens of trillions, is gross exposure. What about net? Netting out is done a bit differently under U.S. accounting rules than under European ones. U.S. GAAP allows banks to disclose positions after they have been netted, whereas International Reporting Financial Standards (IFRS), which European banks use, don't. (If you're interested in the technicalities, here's a link to an article that explains the difference between the two systems, and the pitfalls, pretty well).

Under GAAP, JPMorgan shows net derivative receivables worth $59.7 billion and net derivative payables worth $52.8 billion, therefore a net position would be more like a much less frightening $6.9 billion.

The discussion about derivatives took up a lot of space, so I'll address the other "fears" about Deutsche Bank briefly. Moody's earlier this week cut its credit rating to Baa2, "two notches above junk" as some reports said. Well, I would point out that two notches above junk is still investment grade.

Besides, John Cryan, the Deutsche Bank CEO, came out and told Bloomberg that the bank has enough money to pay its debt four times. Indeed, a look at the first-quarter financial results shows long-term debt worth 151.3 billion euros against loans of more than 424 billion extended by the bank, coupled with other assets worth more than 171 billion euros.

What about the share price's abysmal performance? Its shares lost a quarter of their value year to date (it's true that they've perked up a bit lately).

Well, this is where the real worry should be: Deutsche Bank is unlikely to suddenly collapse under the weight of its huge derivatives portfolio. Instead, it may well, gently but steadily, slide into oblivion, crushed by underperformance and an inability to grow its earnings.

But then, this sounds like the fate of many European banks in this low, or even negative, interest rate environment. It just so happens that Deutsche is the most visible right now.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

Employees of TheStreet are restricted from trading individual securities.

TAGS: Investing | Global Equity | Financial Services

More from Financial Services

UBS Tries to Save the Day, but I Would Withdraw From Buying the Bank

Bruce Kamich
Mar 20, 2023 2:56 PM EDT

Is UBS Group AG a white knight or something else? Let's check the charts and take a gut check.

Regional Banks: Here's What the Charts Are Telling Us

Bruce Kamich
Mar 20, 2023 8:52 AM EDT

Let's take a close look at the KRE, the SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF.

It's Just Another Riveting Day in a Highly Volatile Market

Bret Jensen
Mar 17, 2023 10:00 AM EDT

As my late banker father liked to quip during these types of financial hiccups: 'There is never just one cockroach.'

I've Got a Wary Eye on Intel, and a Few Sector and Index ETFs

Bob Byrne
Mar 17, 2023 8:30 AM EDT

Intel seems trapped in a range, and the ETFs continue to trade beneath important moving averages.

Credit Suisse Gets a Lifeline: Should Investors Buy the 'Two Buck Chuck' Bank?

Ed Ponsi
Mar 16, 2023 10:15 AM EDT

The current situation is reminiscent of 2008, when Citigroup traded at about $1. Let's look how that's played out.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 10:28 AM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    There are exceptions to conventional trading wisdo...
  • 05:43 PM EDT CHRIS VERSACE

    Latest AAP Podcast

    I'm joined by Real Money contributor Peter Tchir a...
  • 08:20 AM EDT PETER TCHIR

    Pre-CPI Thoughts

    I believe the risk to CPI is "asymmetric." It ...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2023 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login