• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / U.S. Equity

What Went Wrong in IGT, Part 2

In short, averaging down is one of the riskiest possible actions.
By TIMOTHY COLLINS
May 25, 2014 | 06:00 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: IGT, OCN, HD, FEYE, SPLS, TWTR

Note: This article is the second part of a two-part article. Please see part one here.

Yesterday, we laid down a quick timeline on the demise of the International Game Technology (IGT) trade. Now let's break down the risks of averaging down on losers.

First, there is a concentration risk. Every trader is different, but I think it is safe to assume when most traders take a position it will be somewhere between 0.5% all the way up to 4% of their portfolio. Even if we stay on the low end and say the original position was 1% of the portfolio, then excluding short puts (which are long exposure), the position has grown to approximately 10 times where it began.

In other words, if you started this at 1% of your portfolio, IGT would now be approximately 10% of your portfolio plus short puts. Had you started it at 4%, then it would be almost half your portfolio once you factor in short puts. While a handful of traders in the world can get away with that type of concentration, it will destroy the vast majority of traders. Best case is this has grown to a 5% position. I think that is tolerable, so the lesson here is if you find this type of trading suits you, start with a very small position in case you are wrong.

Second, there is an opportunity cost. The market is roaring to new highs and the buys are chasing a stock to new lows. While it may come back to breakeven or even a profit, how much money could have been made in other areas? In fact, the paper loss exceeds the entire first purchase plus a few bucks. In other words, the Dec. 5 buy -- if the only one -- could have seen the stock go to zero and still be down less on paper, then continually averaging down.

Third, there is complexity. This position has become overly complex. At this point, it is what I call an "Octo-trade," one with eight legs. It is tying up not only physical capital, but also emotional capital in terms of management and adjustments. One position should not be able to occupy all your time plus be the overriding factor in a portfolio's performance. Furthermore, imagine if you have two or three positions like this that performed in a similar fashion -- I'm looking in your general direction Staples (SPLS) or pretty much any momentum name out there, like Twitter (TWTR) or FireEye (FEYE).

I'm certainly one for making trades overly complex. It may be my biggest fault. Sometimes it is easier to walk away. I hate taking losers as well, especially if I feel my valuation thesis is still valid. Several key personality components drive a trader to making decisions such as these.

Averaging down is driven by a few factors with risk compensation being one of the least talked about but most important. This is the concept where traders tend to take greater risk when they perceive safety increases. In this case, the more the stock falls, the more value it has. Did you ever catch yourself saying, "Well, it's down 30%. How much further could it fall?" That's risk compensation.

The more common thought on why folks average down or repair a trade is loss aversion. Traders often want to avoid the shame of taking a loss. They believe there is a greater risk in giving up on a trade than the reward offered by finding a new position, even if that position is cash. 

Subject validation is something that I talked about with Doug in the terms of chart patterns, but here it is in terms of valuation and reaction to news. The buyers of IGT view the repeated earnings warnings as an opportunity rather than a concern. It is a better value now at a lower price despite the news and trend. A buyer is required to believe that if they are buying. They perceive it to be true, regardless of the news or price action.

In the case of subject validation, it actually leads to a backfire effect. The reaction should be caution when the company warns repeatedly, but instead beliefs that IGT is just becoming a better and better value are strengthened. This is similar and interchangeable with the Ostrich Effect, where on simply ignores a negative situation. Brush off earnings warnings, layoffs, downgrades, technical breakdowns and the like. This can come in all forms, shapes and sizes and is one of the toughest traps not to fall victim to during your trading career.

Finally, as a contributor, one has to avoid falling into the trap of "availability cascade." Twitter and message boards make this possible even for a trader who doesn't write but may post thoughts on trades. In a nutshell, a trader can believe that if he or she repeats something enough, it will come true. Continue to write how something is a great value or a stock is about to break out and you'll begin to believe that your words will become reality. 

Admittedly, there is a lot to take in here, but averaging down (adding to an already losing position) is one of the riskiest actions a trader can undertake. I've seen averaging down, especially on falling knives, destroy more traders than any other strategy. While a few pros, usually with a lot of experience, can make it work, I believe you have to be aware of the reasons behind the actions and fully understand how to control those emotions.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Collins had no positions in the stocks mentioned.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity

More from U.S. Equity

How I'm Approaching Stocks and Bonds After the Fed Minutes

Peter Tchir
May 26, 2022 12:19 PM EDT

I see three key takeaways from Wednesday's FOMC release.

The Bounce Is On: Here's What I've Been Buying

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
May 26, 2022 11:28 AM EDT

The big question now is how far can this run?

Is It Time to Put Money to Work?

Guy Ortmann
May 26, 2022 10:15 AM EDT

Two key indexes have come off their previous negative implications.

The Much-Anticipated Bear Market Bounce Is Starting

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
May 26, 2022 7:49 AM EDT

The best indicator of a tradable bounce is when stocks stop going down on bad news.

Fed Minutes, Rate Hike Odds, Economic Decay, Apple Production, Trading Costco

Stephen Guilfoyle
May 26, 2022 7:16 AM EDT

This is a traders' market until it isn't.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 02:46 PM EDT STEPHEN GUILFOYLE

    We're Shedding Some of This Holding on Strength

    Check out the Stocks Under $10 portfolio here!
  • 11:33 AM EDT PETER TCHIR

    Thoughts Ahead of the Fed Minutes

    Recent economic and earnings issues are convincing...
  • 02:24 PM EDT PAUL PRICE

    An Interesting Chart

    I'm betting heavily that stocks will be way up aga...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2022 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login