• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Consumer Discretionary

Cheaper Clothing Is Winning the Branding Battle

Well-known names losing out to Wal-Mart and others on apparel.
By ROGER ARNOLD May 21, 2015 | 02:57 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: LB, ANF, ARO, AEO, EXPR, GPS, ASNA, URBN, CHS, ANN, RL, PVH, TJX, ROST, BURL, COST, TGT, WMT, AMZN

It's been about six months since I last discussed the performance of the stocks of branded vs. unbranded apparel manufacturers and retailers.

That column was a follow-up to a previous column last year in which I discussed the pattern that was developing of the unbranded manufacturers and retailers outperforming the branded ones. This was indicative of the lack of wage and job growth, especially in the 25- to 44-year-old demographic, that was driving consumers to forgo pricier branded apparel and allocate those discretionary funds into unbranded apparel and other areas.

Those other areas are very important from an economic standpoint because the majority are in low-multiplier things like health care expenses, insurance premiums and utilities. These areas must be purchased by necessity and are thus funded with disposable income.

What's left after those necessities are funded is called discretionary income, and that's what is used to pay for everything else, service consumer debt and fund savings.

The germane point is that as the funding requirements of necessities increase, the money available for discretionary spending decreases and consumers have to make tough choices about how to allocate those reduced available dollars.

The pattern that began to emerge over the past few years of shifting money away from expensive brand-name clothing to less-expensive unbranded clothing has continued over the past six months, as is apparent in the relative performance of stocks in both groups.

In that time, the performance of the branded retailers has been bizarre, with no collective trend, and extremes of minus 31% to positive 24%.

-- L Brands (LB) +12%

-- Abercrombie & Fitch (ANF) -28%,

-- Aéropostale (ARO) -31%

-- American Eagle Outfitters (AEO) +19%

-- Express (EXPR) +16%

-- Gap (GPS) -4%

-- Ascena Retail Group (ASNA) +12%

-- Urban Outfitters (URBN) +4%

-- Chico's FAS (CHS) +7%

-- Ann (ANN) +24%

-- Ralph Lauren (RL) -28%

-- PVH (PVH) -15%

The performance of the unbranded retailers, on the other hand, with the exception of Wal-Mart (WMT), has continued to exhibit the collective upward trend that's been in place for the past few years.

-- TJX Companies (TJX) +7%

-- Ross Stores (ROST) +14%

-- Burlington Stores (BURL) +24%

-- Costco (COST) +3%

-- Target (TGT) +11%

-- Wal-Mart -10%

-- Amazon.com (AMZN) +29%

The differences between the two groups are starkly evident in their relative performances of the past two years, wherein nine of the 12 branded retailers are down in double-digit percentages, one is down about 6% and only two are positive.

Of the seven unbranded retailers discussed here, one is up over 100% in the past two years, five are up in double-digit percentages, and only Wal-Mart is about unchanged.

Given the lack of wage and job growth that continues to be evidenced in the economic reports, coupled with the increasing costs of necessities and the decreasing rate of growth in retail sales that has resulted from it, the probability is that the trend of the unbranded apparel manufacturers and retailers outperforming the branded ones is likely to continue.

However, there's a bit of a conundrum that arises from the performance of the branded apparel companies vs. the broader universe of consumer-goods retailers I wrote about two days ago in the column "Retail: Sales Are Down but Stocks Are Up."

Of these three general groups -- branded apparel, unbranded apparel and consumer-goods retailers -- the unbranded apparel companies have greatly underperformed.

What appears to be occurring is that consumers, when forced with the necessity of how to allocate shrinking discretionary funds, have decided that the economic utility gained from a designer clothing label is less than the utility gained by way of substituting with a less expensive non-designer label.

For many of the consumer-goods companies discussed in the previous column, however, there is not an easily available substitute, which leaves the consumer with having to either purchase or forgo.

Complicating the matter further is that aggregate retail sales figures imply that consumers are not deciding to purchase goods for which there isn't an easily available substitute and are forgoing purchases.

That implies that the negative performance of the branded apparel companies is more in line with economic and consumer reality than is the positive performance of the consumer-goods retailers.

The bottom line is that it is probable that the trend of ubranded retailers outperforming branded retailers will continue and that the broader base of consumer-goods companies should begin to exhibit this same trend by reversing their positive performance of the past year. 

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Arnold had no positions in the stocks mentioned.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Consumer Discretionary

More from Consumer Discretionary

Penn National: Should Investors Put Their Chips Down?

Bruce Kamich
Jun 28, 2022 12:13 PM EDT

Let's check out the charts and indicators on this operator of casinos and racetracks.

I'm Warming Up to Carnival, but Not Ready to Climb Aboard Yet

Jonathan Heller
Jun 27, 2022 10:00 AM EDT

The stock price of a cruise line operator is becoming more reasonable, but its heavy debt load remains a huge concern.

There's No Clear Sailing Ahead for Carnival: Here's How to Play It

Stephen Guilfoyle
Jun 24, 2022 11:32 AM EDT

CCL did lose a lot of money, much more than anticipated, but there are positives.

Bearish Bets: 3 Well-Known Stocks You Should Consider Shorting This Week

Bob Lang
Jun 19, 2022 10:30 AM EDT

These recently downgraded names are displaying both quantitative and technical deterioration.

Beyond Meat Gives Investors Something to Chew On

Bruce Kamich
Jun 15, 2022 1:50 PM EDT

This veggie name is rallying sharply after a summer promotion announcement, but here's my beef with the charts.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 04:51 PM EDT PAUL PRICE

    We should be in for better starting soon.

    Window dressing tomorrow, the last day of ...
  • 11:56 AM EDT STEPHEN GUILFOYLE

    Stocks Under $10

    Check out what's going on in the Stocks Under $10 ...
  • 12:04 AM EDT PAUL PRICE

    Two Good Signs -- Especially for Small-Cap Investors

  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2022 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login