• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Technology

In Fact, There Is No Bubble, Part 3

Smaller software-as-a-service names are all suffering. But if they all collapsed, it would be a non-event.
By JIM CRAMER May 12, 2014 | 01:00 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: SSTK, DDD, SSYS, CNQR, AMZN, ORCL

Note: This is part three of a four-part series. See part one here and part two here.

When it comes to painful revaluation, Shutterstock (SSTK) -- discussed in part two -- is not alone. Take the 3-D printer companies, for example. 3D Systems (DDD) and Stratasys (SSYS) respectively sell at 58x and 40x earnings, with less compound revenue growth than Shutterstock and earnings and revenue that have failed to meet Street estimates. So, again, go through the exercise: If the best of the high-growth companies with earnings and sales growth rising can't maintain high price-to-earnings multiples, who knows where the selling will ultimately stop with the 3-D printing stocks?

Now, if you think it is difficult to value Shutterstock or 3D or Stratasys, let's consider the software names away from Salesforce.com (CRM), whose late-February reversal signified the market's shift. You know these bad boys, formerly the most loved stocks on earth: Workday (WDAY), Veeva Systems (VEEV), Concur Technologies (CNQR), Cornerstone on Demand (CSOD), Medidata Solutions (MDSO). All of these companies were all about one thing and one thing only: growing revenue as fast as possible. I believe that every one of these companies could indeed show a profit if it wanted to -- but, like Salesforce.com, they were trying to grow as quickly as possible in order to block others from coming into their zones of opportunity.

You can see how compelling that logic is to these companies. First, they are software-as-a-service companies, so why shouldn't they be valued liked Salesforce.com? And if you have a problem with Salesforce.com's valuation, than how do you explain Amazon's (AMZN) valuation? Amazon's the greatest performer of the era, and it is only valued by revenue, so why shouldn't our companies be valued on revenue?

The logic does seem ineluctable when you approach it like that. Until, that is, Amazon and Salesforce.com start to go down, not up, as is the case right now. Yep, the market's saying, "We only care about profitability and earnings-per-share multiples, not sales-to-enterprise value or any other once-important metric." These companies don't show any levels of profitability that can be used to validate their current prices. So what happens? The prices go down most days as the market struggles to find a place for them that makes sense.

Remember, however, that this isn't like 2000. Concur, a fine company, is making a ton of money. It is just spending it very fast in order to be sure that no one else will move into its space as the software-as-a-service pro for travel and entertainment expenses.

There is no way this company is going to be insolvent. But it is fair to say that, if it keeps dropping in value from $4 billion, it will be snapped up. That's because it is truly the only game in town.

I wish I could say that for all of the others. I can't, though. That's because they are all in categories that are now regarded as too crucial for IBM (IBM), Microsoft (MSFT) and, perhaps most important, Oracle (ORCL), to lose.

Yes, not only has the market decided to shun companies that have great revenue growth, but the software-as-a-service companies are now being targeted by big, older companies that fear they can't let their turfs be taken away by these upstarts.

I think Oracle, in particular, has decided: OK, we let Salesforce.com grow up before it knew what happened. But we are not going to let these other ingrates to take our clients away. I think Oracle is offering extraordinary deals in order to keep customers from going to these other companies, and that means the company's sales growth, which is what it pride itself on, could be about to slow. That's another nail in the coffin for the group.

That's the bad news. Now let me give you some good news: All of those smaller companies together do not equal $40 billion in market capitalization. That's right -- they are less than one-quarter of Oracle's market value. If they all went under, I don't even think it would matter to the market -- especially because, for the most part, they have no debt on their books.

These are trees falling in the woods, a non-event for all but those who live in treehouses.

There are other areas going through this incredible-shrinking exercise, as well. We'll look at them in part four.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust, was long IBM.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Technology

More from Technology

After Cisco Reports, Will There Be a Tradable Rally?

Bruce Kamich
May 18, 2022 12:04 PM EDT

Let's see how the charts look before earnings Wednesday night.

What's Up? DOCS Might Be Soon

Bruce Kamich
May 17, 2022 2:45 PM EDT

Shares of medical network platform Doximity are positioned for a rally, according to the charts.

You Don't Have to Takes Sides on Apple (If Your Timing Is Right)

Ed Ponsi
May 17, 2022 11:51 AM EDT

It appears that hedge fund owner Michael Burry is betting against AAPL and Warren Buffett is betting on the stock. But let's look at their strategies and why they might both turn out winners.

SoFi Technologies Is Primed for a Rebound

Bruce Kamich
May 16, 2022 8:50 AM EDT

Here's where the shares may be headed next.

A 'Mag'nificent Way to Play an AdTech Rebound

Bret Jensen
May 15, 2022 9:15 PM EDT

Similar to biotech, the small adtech space has been hammered in recent quarters and has likely hit oversold territory.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 01:44 PM EDT STEPHEN GUILFOYLE

    Stocks Under $10 Portfolio

    We're making a series of trades here.
  • 03:07 PM EDT PAUL PRICE

    Why Is Walmart Down Big Today?

    Besides its poor earnings report Walmart was way...
  • 07:14 PM EDT PAUL PRICE

    A New, Very Scary Movie

  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2022 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login