• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • TheStreet Smarts
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Energy

The EPA's Catastrophic Coal Rules

They will effectively prohibit all new coal plants and shut down many existing facilities.
By GLENN WILLIAMS May 07, 2012 | 03:30 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: SO, PPL, AEP, BTU, CNX, CAT, RIO, GE, SI

The EPA recently issued two final rules and they plan to issue three more rules that will effectively prohibit all new coal plants and shut down many existing facilities.

The EPA's rules will also ban many new conventional gas turbines. The nation is left with only three options to power the economy: renewable energy, advanced combined cycle gas turbines and nuclear power. None is cheap.

Two rules already finalized are the Cross State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) and the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS). These change the EPA's existing emission policies by ratcheting up emission requirements at existing power plants. It is retroactive rulemaking.

The third rule, Coal Combustion Residuals Rule, is currently at the proposal stage. According to the EPA, they plan to regulate coal ash generated by power plants. The EPA is considering two options and both fall under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Under the first proposal, it would list residuals as special wastes subject to regulation under subtitle C of RCRA, when destined for disposal in landfills or surface impoundments. Under the second proposal, EPA would regulate coal ash under subtitle D of RCRA, the section for non-hazardous wastes. Either way, power plant owners are in for a rough ride.

The fourth rule, Cooling Water Intake Structures Rule, targets all thermal power plants. According to the EPA, this rule covers roughly 1,260 existing facilities that withdraw 2 million gallons per day of cooling water or more. They estimate that approximately 590 are manufacturers and the remaining 670 are power plants. The technologies required under the rule have been in use for several decades and have already been implemented at a number number of facilities. Nevertheless, other regulators under the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission are concerned that these tighter rules will cause more coal plants to retire early.

The EPA's fifth rule is the proposed carbon rule and it is a doozy. The Carbon Pollution Standard for New Power Plants requires new fossil‐fuel‐fired power plants to meet an output‐based standard of 1,000 pounds of carbon dioxide per megawatt‐hour. The EPA claims the average emission rate from coal-fired generation is 2,249 pounds of carbon dioxide per megawatt‐hour.

In case anyone wonders how a new coal-fired power plant could ever be built, the EPA has a simple answer: Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). The problem for utilities is CCS technology doesn't really exist.

It's not for trying. FuturGen was supposed to be the nation's demonstration project for CCS technology. The project, originally announced by President Bush in 2003, was supposed to be a public-private partnership between Department of Energy (DOE) and an alliance of private-sector companies.

The original alliance included Southern Company (SO), PPL (PPL), Luminant, American Electric Power (AEP), Peabody Energy (BTU), CONSOL Energy (CNX), Caterpillar (CAT), Rio Tinto (RIO), China Huaneng Group and number of other foreign companies.

For years, the project struggled to define scope, schedule and cost. Frustrated, the DOE announced it was pulling its funding in 2008. It cited technical risks and unacceptable cost overruns. At the time, costs were exceeding $1.8 billion or $6.5 million a megawatt. FutureGen became more expensive than a new nuclear power plant and it was far more costly to operate. Why bother.

With a new administration and a mandate for clean coal, DOE announced the restart of the FutureGen project called FutureGen 2.0. All four American utilities dropped out. Now FutureGen 2.0 is mired in similar controversies experienced in the previous administration. It's crystal clear. CCS technology is not ready.

Apparently, the EPA is not talking to the DOE. Incredibly, it believes CCS technology is ready and will be the applicable standard for the industry. The EPA plans to force new coal plants to use CCS technology, ignoring reason and distorting outcomes in the attempt to promulgate a difficult rule.

When the industry combines all five rules, and it must, it will find two incredibly stunning outcomes. First, the industry will conclude it impossible to continue operating tens of thousands of megawatts of existing generation. Second, it will find it impossible to build all manner of new power plants, including simple gas turbines.

The only thermal power plant that can be built under EPA's new rules is an advanced combined cycle gas turbine. They are about a $1 billion a copy and are currently available from General Electric (GE) and Siemens (SI).

EPA boxed in America. They've removed important options. They've forced outcomes using unavailable technologies.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publicaiton, the author had no positions in any of the securities mentioned.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Energy

More from Energy

Something's Gotta Give, and That Something Is the Consumer

Bret Jensen
Sep 15, 2023 1:30 PM EDT

As I parse through the CPI, PPI and retail sales report, as well as other oil price and savings data, I can only reach two conclusions about the economy and market. Neither are good.

Will Occidental Petroleum Finally Make an Upside Breakout?

Bruce Kamich
Sep 14, 2023 2:00 PM EDT

Let's see how convincing the charts look.

Uranium Is Starting to Radiate but It Still Has a Long Way to Go

Bruce Kamich
Sep 14, 2023 9:45 AM EDT

Let's check back in on Cameco and Uranium Energy.

Here's Why I Continue to Be Very Cautious on Stocks

Bret Jensen
Sep 11, 2023 11:30 AM EDT

It's hard to get too excited about stocks when risk free short-term Treasuries are paying 5.5%.

The Smart Money Might Finally Put Their Money Where Their Mouths Are on Oil

Carley Garner
Sep 8, 2023 2:40 PM EDT

The spread between the market sentiment of industry insiders and the net long futures position held in crude oil is unsustainably wide.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 12:20 PM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    Trading in Multiple Time Frames
  • 10:24 AM EDT BRUCE KAMICH

    This Could Get Messy

    A number of key stocks are getting close to import...
  • 01:41 PM EDT CHRIS VERSACE

    Latest AAP Podcast With Helene Meisler!

    Listen in as the Action Alerts PLUS podcast talks ...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2023 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login