• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • TheStreet Smarts
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Financial Services

Two Views of the Same Story

Bank earnings Friday were unimpeachably strong -- so why do media accounts differ so much?
By JIM CRAMER Apr 16, 2012 | 06:33 AM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: JPM, WFC

You wonder why investors get confused? How about this? On Saturday people awoke to two lead stories in two different newspapers. The first, The Wall Street Journal, blares "Bank Earnings Worry Investors."

The second, The New York Times, says "Solid Results at 2 Banks Bode Well for Industry."

Which is right?

Let's continue for a paragraph to find out. The Journal writes:

Two of the nation's largest bans released first-quarter results on Friday that disappointed investors, underlining the industry's struggled with a sluggish economic recovery and the long hangover from the financial crisis.

The Times?

Revenue is back. Hard hit by new regulations and a sluggish economy, banks have struggled to revive top-line performance since the financial crisis, even as profits improved. But two of the nation's largest lenders, JP Morgan Chase and Wells Fargo, reported strong revenue growth on Friday, a surprise that could bode well for the rest of the industry and the broader economy.

To me, the issue is pretty clear-cut: the Journal took its judgment from the horrid action in the stocks, not thinking that perhaps all stocks were bad on Friday. The Times took its judgment from the facts, from how the companies really did, and didn't simply look at the share price and pronounce victory or defeat.

I spent the weekend going over the conference calls and the post notes for Wells Fargo (WFC) and JPMorgan (JPM), and I come away convinced that if we weren't worried about Europe, specifically the Spanish 10-year on Thursday, both bank stocks would have been higher. That's right, higher.

There was nothing in JPMorgan's report that was wrong except the fact that the government and regulatory agencies worldwide continue to hold a fairly tight rein over what the bank can do with its capital. You could argue that there was some line item that might not have been up to snuff, maybe a credit card gain here or a reserve for litigation there. In general, though, the bank is growing and stronger than it has been in years, certainly stronger than the last time it was here before going much lower.

Wells Fargo? Let me be clear about this: Wells had an amazing quarter. This quarter had excellent growth, declining loan losses, fantastic initial progress with the government's plan to help underwater homeowners and it managed to take out huge costs while growing beyond what anyone expected.

Plus, it is one of the rare beneficiaries of the European woes, having little actual exposure to any part of Europe but also having purchased a huge parcel of energy loans from Paribas, with $9.5 billion in loan commitments.

The Journal didn't buy Wells' story at all, saying that loan growth appeared to slow. To me, I wonder ... were they on the same conference call as I was? This bank is doing so, so well, with 30% of the mortgage market, and one can only wonder if it is going to have a miraculous earnings resurgence as the year goes on.

I am not sure if many people realize how journalists are letting the stocks, not the fundamentals, determine the spin. Friday was a horrid day for banks because the banks reflected worries about Europe, even if they shouldn't. They are easy shorts because they can't be taken over and they don't have big enough yields yet to daunt the naysayers. But make no mistake about their revenue growth: It is back. And earnings are beginning to reflect not just cost-cutting but sales growth, too.

_______

Editor's Links

More by Jim Cramer:

  • Business as Usual
  • This Selloff Is Just Profit-Taking
  • Don't Get Carried Away With the Negatives
Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust, is long JPMorgan.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Financial Services

More from Financial Services

American Express: Leave Home Without It

Bruce Kamich
Oct 3, 2023 1:55 PM EDT

The charts show further declines ahead for the credit card company.

AllianceBernstein: The Window Is Open for a Recovery Rally

Bruce Kamich
Oct 3, 2023 8:02 AM EDT

Let's check the charts and indicators.

Trading Coinbase Is More Than Just a Flip of the Coin

Bruce Kamich
Oct 2, 2023 1:30 PM EDT

The stock rallied early Monday, but those gains are fading.

This Company Grows Like a Tech Stock, but Is Bargain-Priced

Paul Price
Sep 29, 2023 7:00 AM EDT

Let's see why Axos Financial is an excellent play.

Doug Kass: My Real Money Pal Just Picked Berkshire for Q4. I Disagree

Doug Kass
Sep 25, 2023 2:34 PM EDT

Here's why I'm shorting the very stock that Stephen 'Sarge' Guilfoyle picked as his stock for the remainder of the year.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 12:13 PM EDT BRUCE KAMICH

    8 Trading Rules from T. T. Hoyne

    You just read the header for this missive and prob...
  • 08:42 AM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    How Elite Traders Make Big Profits
  • 02:58 PM EDT BRUCE KAMICH

    Classic Trading Rules From Bernard Baruch

    Bernard Baruch listed the rules (below) in his aut...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2023 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login