• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • TheStreet Smarts
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Financial Services

Supporting Housing Is Not Supporting the Economy

Believing the economy functions best by allocating as much income toward housing as possible is insane.
By ROGER ARNOLD Apr 09, 2016 | 12:00 PM EDT

My last two columns, "Changes in Housing Attitudes, Changes in Economic Latitudes" and "Still Waiting on a Homebuying Rebound," elicited quite a few comments and challenges from subscribers, so I'm going to delve a bit further into the issue of housing and its relationship to the economy and the capital markets.
 
In the latter half of the 1990s and first half of the 2000s, I owned a residential mortgage brokerage that originated loans nationally. The market concentration was in the coastal urban areas of the U.S. that also had stations carrying my radio show. They included every major city on both coasts, as well as Phoenix, Houston, Dallas and New Orleans.
 
These were also the areas that experienced the greatest boom in real estate speculation, lending and appreciation.
 
One of the aspects of the housing bust that followed that boom is that it was magnified in its breadth and scope because the vast majority of homeowners at all income levels and home price points were levered to the greatest extent possible. That aspect has never received the attention it should have by public financial policymakers, bankers and capital market participants broadly.
 
What that implies is that it wasn't the poor and people with low credit scores who accepted the invitation by the wealthy to participate in the housing sector by way of subprime loans that caused the subsequent housing bust to metastasize into a full-blown financial crisis.
 
It was the vast majority of the pre-existing homebuying market participants who got stupid and started to leverage themselves into real estate to a much greater degree than had been the case before underwriting guidelines were degraded.
 
At the time I was originating mortgages, we referred to this as the dentist wanting to live like a hedge fund manager.
 
The bulk of the corrective action taken since then, however, has been focused on doing away with mortgages for people with low credit scores and requiring income documentation for everyone.
 
The logic in limiting the corrective action to these areas is predicated on placing the blame for the crisis on the poor, which is simply ludicrous.
 
By extension, this also implies that public financial policymakers and regulators are of the opinion that home prices were closer to their real value 10 years ago and that the correction in values since has taken them below the long-term trend as a percentage of national income necessary to support them.  
 
Beyond cutting out mortgages for people with bad credit, the corrective process designed to support home values has also been to allow for an even greater percentage of income to be allocated to mortgage servicing than was the case prior to the last housing boom.
 
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac now allow borrowers to allocate up to 45% of their gross income for mortgage servicing. Prior to the 2000s, that level was 28%.
 
Allowing this degree of income leveraging supports home prices, but it also pushes them to levels that cause the sector to absorb national income and per-capita income, which in turn provides a drag on economic activity and the ability of the economy and incomes to grow.
 
In total, this activity by regulators, public financial policymakers, bankers and consumers is indicative of a kind of Stockholm syndrome wherein everyone believes the economy functions best by allocating as much income toward housing as possible.
 
This is an insane proposition because doing so actually accomplishes the exact opposite.
 
Since the Lehman-crisis era, monetary and fiscal authorities have been operating on the assumption that supporting home prices is synonymous with supporting the economy.
 
The reality, however, is that supporting home prices in the fashion that's been pursued is actually harming the rest of the economy.
 
If the Fed and mortgage regulators really wanted to support the economy, real growth and growth of jobs and incomes, the goal in policymaking should be to establish a plan for reducing the amount of national and per-capita income that may be dedicated to mortgage servicing, not increasing it.
 
Having said all of that, there is no awareness of the error in public financial and regulatory policy being evidenced by policymakers.
 
This will inevitably have to change at some point and investors need to be watchful for signs of this awareness being expressed by policymakers.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Arnold had no positions in the stocks mentioned.

TAGS: Financial Services | Investing

More from Financial Services

The Charts Just Don't Give Much Affirmation on Affirm Ahead of Earnings

Bruce Kamich
Feb 3, 2023 1:54 PM EST

Here's the picture we see from this payment company.

Is Redfin's Stock Ready to Make a Sustained Recovery?

Bruce Kamich
Feb 3, 2023 9:04 AM EST

RDFN will need more compelling base building.

ADP Shares Could Rebound, but There's a Bigger Picture

Bruce Kamich
Feb 1, 2023 9:51 AM EST

Here's what the charts of Automatic Data Processing are telling us now.

What's Next for Block's Stock?

Bruce Kamich
Jan 31, 2023 10:55 AM EST

Watch for a possible rally.

That SoFi Technologies Improved So Quickly Is No Surprise: Here's What I'd Do

Stephen Guilfoyle
Jan 30, 2023 11:15 AM EST

Here's the most important thing we've heard from SOFI, maybe ever.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 02:58 PM EST REAL MONEY

    Sarge Guilfoyle Breaks Down the Jobs Report, Fed Policy and Stocks!

    Watch it here!
  • 11:35 AM EST JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    Trading an Irrational Market
  • 02:10 PM EST REAL MONEY

    Fed Rate Decision

    Fed Lifts Benchmark Rate by 25 Basis Points, Sees ...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2023 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login