• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Doug Kass
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Jim Cramer
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Consumer Discretionary

In Retail, Gap Is More Like an Abyss

The recent rebound is undeserved and the stock should be avoided.
By BRIAN SOZZI Apr 05, 2016 | 10:00 AM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: GPS, ANF, ARO, PSUN, WMT

Shares of Gap (GPS) have bucked the trend of destruction that has swept through the specialty retail sector this year, tripping up household names such as Aeropostale (ARO) and Pacific Sunwear (PSUN).

Unfortunately, the remarkable 20% gain in Gap is completely unfounded and borderline ridiculous, and the stock should be avoided at all costs. On Monday, shares popped about 1.5% on a positive note from KeyBanc, citing improvements in product style, fits (always an issue with Gap and most especially Banana Republic) and pricing. I don't know what buds that analyst team is smoking, but my rather frequent checks into Gap and Banana Republic have yielded quite the opposite observations.

First of all, Gap's stores were set with absurdly bright colors almost the day after Christmas -- I think this continued traditional approach to merchandise allocation remains an issue, especially as consumers continue to buy closer to need rather than investing in clothing months in advance.

Second, Gap's products across the board for men have been the most uninspiring, lackluster offerings I have seen in quite some time from the company. Gap should be embarrassed by the blandness in an industry where companies such as H&M and Forever 21 continue to gain customers due to their trendy, affordable styles. As for women -- obviously, I am not wearing the stuff -- but the offerings I have seen post-Christmas are almost as uninspiring as for the men.

All in all, I think Gap's first-quarter results are trending nothing short of disappointing, and guidance for the second quarter will be on the weak side.

If you are so inclined to play specialty apparel into the spring, it should (believe it or not) be through Abercrombie & Fitch (ANF). The company is undergoing a nice rebirth amid a new designer and leadership who are returning the brand to its roots in casual yet trendy rugged looks. I came away very impressed with the blocking and tackling being done by Abercrombie & Fitch's new CEO when chatting with him recently for TheStreet.

Having said that, if you are not inclined to trust my assessment of Gap's apparel, then base your views on the name on cold, hard facts.

Leadership: Gap's relatively new CEO, Art Peck, has not proven he could reinvigorate the brand. In my view, the stock is trading up on the ambitious hope Peck drives a spring turnaround at Gap and Banana Republic, while not allowing Old Navy to fall off the map following the loss of a key executive to Polo Ralph Lauren (RL) late in 2015. Frankly, I don't think anyone could save the Gap division -- it has long entered a period of steady decline that will unlikely end well in my lifetime.

Monthly sales releases: The company's monthly sales releases continue to point to horribly weak sales on a global scale. All of the releases so far this year reek of a retailer struggling to find a place in the hearts of consumers, not one on the comeback trail (I encourage you to look at how the sales trends are changing for the better at Abercrombie & Fitch, an example of a retailer headed for a turnaround). I think investors will be wise to remain focused on Gap's weak sales -- the market is likely to dump its hope for a spring sales revival and assess Gap for what's really happening.

Online sales: Amid the ongoing boom of online shopping, Gap's online sales have basically gone nowhere in recent years. Gap's online sales of $2.5 billion in 2015 were unchanged year over year, and up marginally from $2.3 billion in 2013. That is laughable, worrying and flat-out weird. By comparison, Lululemon's (LULU) online sales rose 25% in 2015. Nike's (NKE) online revenues surged 56% for the three months ended Feb. 29. Even the world's largest retailer, Wal-Mart (WMT), saw better online sales growth than Gap in 2015 -- global e-commerce sales rose 12%.

Bottom line is that if a retailer is not growing strongly online in the age of digital, there is something fundamentally wrong with the company; don't invest in it until trends are reversed.  

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

Employees of TheStreet are restricted from tradiing individual securities.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Consumer Discretionary | Stocks

More from Consumer Discretionary

4 More Unloved Stocks Going Into My Latest Tax-Loss Selling Portfolio

Jonathan Heller
Dec 6, 2019 11:00 AM EST

We'll track a dozen beaten-up stocks that could be subject to tax-loss selling at the end of 2019 to see whether they can stage comebacks in 2020.

Ready, Set, Go: Nike Could Break Out to the Upside

Bruce Kamich
Dec 5, 2019 11:09 AM EST

Let's check the charts and technical indicators before we lace up a recommendation.

Sector Geography Lesson, Japan's Stimulus and Zooming In on Zuora: Market Recon

Stephen Guilfoyle
Dec 5, 2019 8:48 AM EST

Plus, the Saudis look to press their oil agenda while Europe prints some ugly economic data.

Mattel May Be Done Declining but the Bull Case Is Not Compelling

Bruce Kamich
Dec 5, 2019 8:41 AM EST

Let's review the charts.

It Was a Very Good Year for This Portfolio of 2018 Losers

Jonathan Heller
Dec 2, 2019 11:00 AM EST

The dozen stocks in this portfolio of companies that likely came under tax-loss selling pressure last year performed quite well as a group in 2019.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 10:55 AM EST BOB LANG

    Strength in Semis and Banks

    Seeing some really good power in the semis today a...
  • 09:16 AM EST CHRIS VERSACE

    Dual Dividend Gift

    Coming up soon on Real Money Pro.
  • 11:02 AM EST BOB LANG

    Added Some Peloton

    This stock is starting to gain some traction, the ...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2019 TheStreet, Inc., 14 Wall Street, 15th Fl, NY, NY 10005

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login