• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Doug Kass
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Jim Cramer
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Technology

Are We Witnessing the Death of FANG Stocks?

Maybe it's time to look at these stocks individually rather than as a group.
By STEPHEN GUILFOYLE
Apr 2, 2018 Updated Apr 02, 2018 | 10:33 AM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: AMZN, NFLX, GOOG, GOOGL, FB, NVDA, AAPL, DIS, LRCX, JPM, C

"I enjoyed climbing with other people, good friends, but I did quite a lot of solo climbing, too." -- Edmund Hillary

Is this the death of the FANG stocks? All four FANGs -- Facebook (FB) , Amazon (AMZN) , Netflix (NFLX) and Google/Alphabet (GOOG) , (GOOGL) -- have fallen during the past 30 days, and all but AMZN are down over the past three months as well.

But while it might be hard to remember, this isn't the first time that we've had to ask about the FANGs' possible demise. After all, the four have struggled at times with sideways movement (mid-2017) or even outright contraction (early 2016).

The crux of the matter is that prior to the tech sector's recent overt shakeout, the segment had risen to account for more than 25% of the S&P 500. But remember, the index has 10 other sectors.

Now, the S&P 500's 11 sectors have never been evenly represented, and the index has always been given to overrepresenting the "hot hand," so to speak. That said, investors have long been drawn to passive index investing and away from active stock selection, which can create sector rotations more violent than what most people likely anticipate.

Many index funds that weight by market cap end up overweighting certain stocks as those names outperform the pack. This can look fantastic on the way up, but creates a roller coaster on the way down. That especially applies to wild outperformers such as the FANGs.

The FANGs' Future

Where do the FANGs go from here? My thoughts on that question are complex.

First, I don't see the tech sector experiencing a permanent loss of market leadership. Did you see Jim Cramer's interview Thursday night with Jensen Huang, founder and CEO of Nvidia (NVDA) ? Huang hardly seemed like a man rattled by his stock's recent short-term pullback, or by cryptocurrencies' recent underperformance, either.

My thoughts are that the demand is still there for the stock of companies that create what the future will hold. Areas such as artificial intelligence, virtual reality, gaming and autonomous driving (or really autonomous anything) are here to stay.

That's true for tech in general, but what about the FANGs specifically? Will there be demand in the future for what they offer -- social media, online retailing, cloud services, streaming entertainment and Internet search?

Yes ... but not in equal parts. I think it's likely that we'll end up tossing the FANG acronym away. In fact, we've already seen the FANG acronym changed to "FAANG" or even "FAANNG" as market pundits added Apple (AAPL) and Nvidia.

But the time has come for investors to treat these names as individual stocks rather than as a group. So, let's check the FAANNG stocks out on that basis:

Facebook

I like Facebook.com, but my kids (who are in their 20s) don't use the service at all. They don't use Facebook-owned Instagram all that much, either.

Still, my thought is that although younger adults have been drawn elsewhere, Facebook.com remains a great tool for staying in touch with friends and family when you're older. Therefore, the site seems like it's here to stay, but in a much more highly regulated way given all of the recent problems that it's had with alleged "fake news" and other issues.

As for Facebook's stock, it found some support late last week around $150 after peaking above $195 in early February. It's my opinion that this name will be tradable for quite some time, but is currently damaged both in reputation and as an investment. So, I don't own Facebook right now.

Amazon

President Trump did a number on this stock last week with his pointed attacks on Amazon via Twitter. The question now becomes just how much resistance AMZN will find as it tries to retake its 50-day simple moving average of $1,469.

This is the one FANG name that I remain long on. But the problem here for me (and for many other investors, I bet) is that even with a 200-plus-point decline, Amazon is still trading hundreds of points above my cost basis. That makes it awfully tough for AMZN to establish support.

Still, Amazon remains the "Death Star" among retailers, seemingly able to kill off all competitors. The company is also a leader in both Web and cloud services. Bet against CEO Jeff Bezos? Not me.

Apple

I'm currently long on Apple, but might have learned my lesson. If the stock gets back to $176 (from Thursday's close at $167.78), then I'll sell some of my stake.

Now, Apple seemed to be differentiating itself nicely until it went "poof!" late last week after Goldman Sachs cut estimates for both 2018 iPhone sales and revenues. Sales and revenues for 2019 and 2020 remain suspect as well.

Of course, I'm not long Apple because of its product development; I believe the firm to has gone stale in that department. Instead, I'm long because I've personally found it difficult to break myself out of the Apple ecosystem. It's just too much trouble.

If I think that way, I bet that other people feel that way, too. So, think "recurring revenue stream."

Netflix

I'm flat this name, but I'll admit that I've never traded Netflix well.

I came into 2018 long NFLX, then sold the shares just ahead of earnings, satisfied that I had made a killing. But If you follow the name, you know how much Netflix rose from January until early March.

I think that might make NFLX vulnerable now, but the stock still seems to be outperforming its peers. However, it seems like competition in the space will only grow from here. Walt Disney Co. (DIS) is coming, and armed with loads of content at that.

So, I'm fine with trading Netflix around events like earnings, but am more cautious about owning the stock for the long term.

Nvidia

I'm not only long this stock, but Nvidia remains one of my long-time favorites for the long term.

Still, that doesn't mean that I won't trade around my core position, and last week's action was a gift. Nvidia sold off hard on the announcement that the firm was taking its autonomous-driving program off public roads while waiting to see what it could learn from the recent fatal Arizona accident involving an Uber autonomous vehicle.

Google/Alphabet

This name scares me a bit, as GOOGL dipped below $1,000 last week to its lowest intraday prices since October.

The stock did retake its 200-day simple moving average on Friday, but GOOGL remains miles below its 50-day SMA and technically weaker than some of the other FAANNGs. I'm OK with renting this name on news, but as for buying and holding, the jury's still out.

Chart Of The Day: Lam Research

I'll admit that I took a wee bit of profit on Lam Research (LRCX) during last week's tech wreck. It seems prudent to protect your winners when things get dicey.

Still, LRCX has been one of my long-time top performers, and last week, Mizuho initiated the name with a "Buy" rating and a $250 price target (vs. Thursday's close at $203.16). The week before that, Bank of America Merrill Lynch initiated coverage of LRCX with a "Buy" recommendation and a $305 price target.

Lam also announced significant boosts last month to both its dividend payout and stock-repurchase program, and will report fiscal-third-quarter earnings on April 17. That's just a few days after JP Morgan Chase (JPM) and Citigroup (C) unofficially kick off earnings season.

All of that said, Lam has serious headline risk regarding any potential U.S. trade war with China.

Let's check out the stock's chart:

What I noticed first in the above chart is a softer Relative Strength Index (marked "RSI (14)" above) and a suddenly vulnerable daily Moving Average Convergence Divergence oscillator ("MACD" above) now that Lam's nine-day exponential moving average has gone decisively negative.

That said, the stock's Chaikin Money Flow ("CMF" above) has remained in the green since Lam made those positive announcements in early March. LRCX also appears to show some obedience to its Fibonacci levels. The 50% retracement level worked as support back in December and appears to have just worked again, although off of a different timeline just last week.

The most recent Fibonacci retracement level is also close enough to Lam's 50-day simple moving average ("MA (50)") to say that we do indeed hit some traction here. Look further and you can also see that the central trend line provided by the Pitchfork has worked nicely as a rising pivot since early December.

What that means to me as someone who owns Lax is that a break at $194 would allow for movement lower to around $185. But I also think that absent any negative China news, LRCX will be drawn toward $220 as we approach the company's next earnings report.

Also, don't discount how well CEO Martin Anstice comes off at times like that. He's a leader that I would bet on (and actually do).

Playing LRCX Using Options

Now, a $203 stock is kind of a tough nut for a small investor to get involved with, so here's an idea on how to play Lam using a so-called "bull-call spread."

Lam's earnings are due out on April 17, and April 20 is an expiration Friday. If I'm right, the name could approach $220 by then, but $210 LRCX calls that expire on April 20 ended trading last week at $8, while $220 calls with the same expiration ended at $4.20.

So, you can expose yourself to a possible $10-a-share profit while risking just $3.80 if you purchase the $210s at $8 and write $220s at $4.20. Now, if Lam never hits $210, then you're out the $3.80. But if the stock hits $210 and not $220 by expiration, you'd keep the all gains above $210 minus that $3.80.

And if shares rise above $220 by April 20, you'd score a $6.20 net profit (but forfeit any share-price gains above that level).

Economics (All Times Eastern)

09:45 -- Markit Manufacturing PMI (March-f): Flashed 55.7.

10:00 -- ISM Manufacturing Index (March): Expecting 60.1, Last 60.8.

10:00 -- Construction Spending (February): Expecting 0.4%, Last 0.0% m/m.

18:00 -- Fed Speaker: Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari.

Today's Earnings Highlights (Consensus EPS Expectations)

After the close: SWCH (-.20)

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Guilfoyle was long AAPL, AMZN, C, DIS, LRCX and NVDA, although positions may change at any time.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Technology | Consumer Discretionary | Markets | Stocks

More from Technology

Kass: Time to Introduce a Financial Transaction Tax and End Weekly Stock Options

Doug Kass
Feb 27, 2021 8:15 AM EST

I believe more sensible regulations should be considered and enforcement is needed to adapt to gains in technology.

I'm Intrigued by the Recent Pullback in Aurora Mobile

Timothy Collins
Feb 26, 2021 3:30 PM EST

While the Chinese company is still not profitable, it is cash flow positive.

Nvidia's Decline Doesn't Make It a Buying Opportunity - Yet

Bruce Kamich
Feb 26, 2021 7:54 AM EST

NVDA has weakened despite great fundamental numbers.

Remember, This Ain't Noah's 'ARK,' It's Still Just a Leveraged Tech Fund

Timothy Collins
Feb 25, 2021 12:40 PM EST

Let's put ARKK in perspective with TQQQ and QQQ, as we get all the hype about Cathie Wood and the fund's 210% rise.

Here's My Technical View on Advanced Micro Devices

Bruce Kamich
Feb 25, 2021 11:00 AM EST

AMD's near-term price action troubles me.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 11:51 AM EST REAL MONEY

    Watch Bob Lang and Doug Kass Discuss Short-Selling!

    Bob Lang and Doug Kass with an engaging and educat...
  • 11:32 AM EST JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    Navigating a Market Correction
  • 11:29 AM EST GARY BERMAN

    Where Does the Nasdaq Go From Here?

    Where does the Nasdaq Composite (CCMP) index go fr...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2021 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login